No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
AWS Backup enhances data protection, streamlines management, and provides cost savings, ensuring compliance readiness and operational efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.5
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reduces recovery time, costs, and personnel needs with automated processes, enhancing efficiency and audit readiness.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
Senior Java Developer at J.P. Morgan
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
AWS Backup offers efficient support with quick responses, though complex issues and repeated log requests may require additional assistance.
Sentiment score
7.3
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides effective support with quick responses, though some prefer a formal ticketing system for tracking.
The customer service is top-notch, rated ten out of ten.
Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group
In the first interaction, I have already provided the logs, and they are asking again and again for the same logs.
Senior Analyst at ESRI INDIA
The customer support is amazing, and it is the best customer support I have ever had.
Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
AWS Backup is highly scalable and well-rated, but lacks support for non-VMware platforms and some specific features.
Sentiment score
7.2
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery scales effectively across environments, supporting diverse workloads with minimal setup and earning high user ratings.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
Senior Java Developer at J.P. Morgan
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
Software Engineer at INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
The scalability of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 10 out of 10.
Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
AWS Backup offers stable performance and reliability, achieving high user ratings and 99.99% uptime, with minor integration concerns.
Sentiment score
7.5
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable and reliable, with occasional lags mostly due to network or server-specific issues.
AWS Backup is very stable, rating nine out of ten.
Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group
It is very good and very reliable.
DevOps Engineer at DivVerse Labs
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
Assistant Programmer at Mahadis
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
Senior Java Developer at J.P. Morgan
 

Room For Improvement

AWS Backup needs improvements in visibility, reporting, restore speed, hybrid capabilities, encryption, cost, scheduling, ease of use, and service support.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery needs enhancements in support, automation, integration, monitoring, user interface, and training for better user experience.
Currently, it only includes around ten services, while AWS offers over three hundred plus services.
Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group
Regarding disadvantages of AWS Backup, it can be expensive and not particularly user-friendly.
Lead Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
Software Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Because the replication is continuous and block-level, if a production server is hit by ransomware, the encrypted garbage data is often replicated to the DR site in near-real time.
Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
DevOps Engineer at DivVerse Labs
 

Setup Cost

AWS Backup offers flexible, usage-based pricing, without a license fee, appealing to businesses with its cost-effectiveness and scalability.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is cost-efficient and scalable, though setup and cumulative costs can accumulate, limiting flexibility.
AWS Backup has a moderate cost, rated at two or three out of ten regarding pricing.
Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
Software Engineer at INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
pricing is fair, and you pay for the use.
Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

AWS Backup is a secure, scalable service offering centralized management, automation, and integration, simplifying data management and error reduction.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers efficient recovery, quick failover, and reliable data protection with cost-effective, real-time access and seamless system recovery.
The ability to maintain all backups via one service simplifies compliance with regulations such as NIST, PCI DSS, and HIPAA.
Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group
If we encounter any service-related issues, such as when someone accidentally deletes a table in production or testing, we can immediately restore the data from backup.
Lead Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
It is quite easy to manage AWS Backup's centralized console for multiple environments.
Senior Analyst at ESRI INDIA
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
Senior Software Engineer at Thomson Reuters
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Software Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Backup
Ranking in Cloud Backup
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
SaaS Backup (5th)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Ranking in Cloud Backup
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (9th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of AWS Backup is 2.4%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery1.3%
AWS Backup2.4%
Other96.3%
Cloud Backup
 

Featured Reviews

RiteshPurbey - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at ESRI INDIA
Manages virtual machine backups smoothly and simplifies restoration across environments
It is quite easy to manage AWS Backup's centralized console for multiple environments. The product's interface is intuitive. AWS Backup has a much higher price if you compare it with the snapshots. I have to pay for the whole environment by AWS. We have a backup solution with only virtual machines. The rest of it, we have a restore point.
KS
Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Continuous replication has protected critical servers and supports seamless disaster recovery drills
Some features that I personally feel can be improved are more simplified monitoring and reporting. As I previously mentioned, the console shows the replication status. If it had more detailed dashboards or built-in reports for DR readiness, it would make it easier for the teams to track everything in one place. Another improvement would be cost visibility and optimization guidance in optimizing the cost and also giving us visibility of it. Because the staging resources and replication storage are running continuously, it would be very helpful for organizations and users if AWS provided clearer cost insights, recommendations, and remediations to optimize the DR environment. It would also be useful if AWS added more automation options for application-level recovery, such as easier ways to handle IP changes, domain name system (DNS) updates, or application dependencies during failover. Additionally, we can simplify the setup and configuration process. For someone new to the service, understanding the staging settings, launch templates, and networking configurations can take some time. Setup simplicity and more detailed monitoring and alerting features would be beneficial. If we could add that, we can easily track the replication health, lag, and potential issues. Instead of relying on other additional tools for monitoring and alerting features, we can rely on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery itself.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
University
6%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Backup?
Pricing for AWS Backup is based on storage and backup frequency. Although it is reasonable, it requires monitoring, especially with long retention periods.
What needs improvement with AWS Backup?
AWS Backup could be improved by adding better visibility and reporting features. A more detailed dashboard is required for this service. Another improvement would be faster restore times for large ...
What is your primary use case for AWS Backup?
AWS Backup is used to centrally manage backups for services like EBS volumes, RDS databases, and sometimes EFS, primarily for data protection and compliance purposes. In one specific project, multi...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing is fair, and you pay for the use.
What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
I believe AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery can be improved by providing more features, such as an automated or AI-based solution that detects issues before they happen, which is a feature I would want...
What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?
My main use case for AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is to minimize downtime and data loss with fast recovery of our on-premises and cloud-based applications using storage, minimum compute, and point...
 

Also Known As

No data available
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TransferWise
Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.