AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery comparison

AWS Backup and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. AWS Backup is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. AWS Backup holds a 2.2% mindshare in CB, compared to AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of AWS Backup users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users who would recommend it.

AWS Backup

Read 29 AWS Backup reviews

5,729 Views
4,984 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 25 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

5,291 Views
2,698 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

AWS Backup

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and AWS Backup compete in disaster recovery and backup services. AWS Backup seems to have the upper hand due to its pay-as-you-go pricing model and ease of use.

Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery focuses on instant block replication, continuous data protection, and live block verification, offering a scalable cloud-based solution. It minimizes the need for additional hardware. AWS Backup offers snapshot capability, point-in-time recovery, and seamless integration with AWS services, making it suitable for regular backup and restore operations.

Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users request enhanced automation, improved logging, and better client performance stability. They also desire better cost management and less complex failback processes. AWS Backup could benefit from improved database backup capabilities, enhanced integration with backup management tools, and better file-based copying options. Simplification of restore processes and improved hybrid cloud backup are needed.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports various environments, including on-premises, hybrid, and private clouds. Its technical support is robust, although users suggest a more structured ticketing system. AWS Backup supports public and hybrid clouds, offering straightforward configuration and integration. Users suggest improvements in support and reporting features, with both services receiving positive support feedback.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery features a somewhat complex pricing model involving licenses, AWS environment costs, and storage fees. It offers high ROI through hardware cost savings and versatile deployments. AWS Backup is cheaper with its pay-as-you-go pricing, charging only for storage used. It offers flexibility but could benefit from reduced costs and more transparent pricing. Both solutions are integrated within the AWS ecosystem, offering strong ROI and enhancing operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.1

AWS Backup enhances ROI through data protection, compliance readiness, and cost-effective, efficient backup management with strong time savings.

Sentiment score

7.5

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides cost-effective, flexible disaster recovery, reducing expenses, improving recovery times, and enhancing compliance efficiently.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Backup report

However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.

Kavya S

Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.

Vamshidhar Gade

Senior Java Developer at J.P. Morgan

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.5

AWS Backup customer service is generally appreciated for quick responses, though satisfaction varies with complexity and support plan level.

Sentiment score

7.3

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's support quality varies, with mixed reviews on responsiveness, support plans, and reliance on third-party assistance.

The customer service is top-notch, rated ten out of ten.

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

In the first interaction, I have already provided the logs, and they are asking again and again for the same logs.

RiteshPurbey

Senior Analyst at ESRI INDIA

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Backup report

The customer support is amazing, and it is the best customer support I have ever had.

Iurii Efimov

Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees

In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.

Kavya S

Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

AWS Backup is scalable and suitable for various businesses, despite limited platform support and certain feature constraints.

Sentiment score

7.2

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is highly scalable, smoothly handling growth for enterprises with reliable upgrades and efficient resource deployment.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Backup report

We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.

Vamshidhar Gade

Senior Java Developer at J.P. Morgan

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.

Deva Rugved

Software Engineer at INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

The scalability of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 10 out of 10.

Iurii Efimov

Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.0

AWS Backup is highly stable and reliable, boasting 99.99% uptime, with minor issues for less experienced users.

Sentiment score

7.5

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable and reliable, but some tasks may lag, and continuous data replication raises cost concerns.

AWS Backup is very stable, rating nine out of ten.

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Backup report

It is very good and very reliable.

Olusegun Akinnola

DevOps Engineer at DivVerse Labs

AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.

Vamshidhar Gade

Senior Java Developer at J.P. Morgan

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery report

Room For Improvement

AWS Backup needs better reporting, faster restores, enhanced hybrid support, cost efficiency, improved UX, and better database compatibility.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery needs upgrades in automation, user interface, and monitoring for efficient disaster recovery operations and planning.

Stronger automated recovery testing capabilities and enhanced governance features for larger, multi-account, and multi-regional environments would make AWS Backup even more valuable for enterprise-scale operations.

Chukwudi Uzoma

Head Of IT, Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Currently, it only includes around ten services, while AWS offers over three hundred plus services.

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Regarding disadvantages of AWS Backup, it can be expensive and not particularly user-friendly.

VinodKumar9

Lead Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Backup report

Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.

reviewer2802339

Software Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Because the replication is continuous and block-level, if a production server is hit by ransomware, the encrypted garbage data is often replicated to the DR site in near-real time.

Iurii Efimov

Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees

This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.

Olusegun Akinnola

DevOps Engineer at DivVerse Labs

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery report

Setup Cost

AWS Backup costs depend on storage and usage, requiring monitoring despite competitive pricing, with non-transparent enterprise terms.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides scalable pricing, though some users find it costly, especially regarding CloudEndure's backup fees.

AWS Backup has a moderate cost, rated at two or three out of ten regarding pricing.

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Backup report

In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.

Kavya S

Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.

Deva Rugved

Software Engineer at INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING

pricing is fair, and you pay for the use.

Iurii Efimov

Head Of Product & Engineering (Cpto) at a real estate/law firm with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery report

Valuable Features

AWS Backup provides centralized management, cross-region support, scalability, and security, with seamless AWS integration and user-friendly automation.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery ensures efficient, cost-effective disaster recovery with seamless integration, continuous replication, and minimal downtime risk.

The ability to maintain all backups via one service simplifies compliance with regulations such as NIST, PCI DSS, and HIPAA.

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

If we encounter any service-related issues, such as when someone accidentally deletes a table in production or testing, we can immediately restore the data from backup.

VinodKumar9

Lead Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

The integration with AWS Organization allows backup policies to be applied consistently across multiple accounts, which is very important for large organization environments where governance and compliance are critical.

Chukwudi Uzoma

Head Of IT, Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Backup report

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.

Harsh Shrivastava

Senior Software Engineer at Thomson Reuters

The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.

reviewer2802339

Software Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.

Kavya S

Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery report

Categories and Ranking

AWS Backup

Ranking in Cloud Backup

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (8th)

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Cloud Backup

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (11th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of AWS Backup is 2.2%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery	1.3%
AWS Backup	2.2%
Other	96.5%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Chukwudi Uzoma

Head Of IT, Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated backups have strengthened governance and compliance while simplifying recovery

AWS Backup offers several valuable features. I think the fact that it is an AWS organization-wide service is significant. It is a centralized management system that allows me to manage AWS Backup policies, retention periods, and monitoring from a single place instead of configuring these backups for each AWS service. This helps with governance and control. Another feature I appreciate is the integration with AWS Organization, which allows backup policies to be applied consistently across multiple accounts, which is very important for large organization environments where governance and compliance are critical. I also appreciate the automated backup plans that reduce operational overhead and ensure resources are protected without relying on manual intervention. Additionally, cross-account and cross-region backup support improves resilience against accidental deletion, ransomware, or regional outages. The compliance and reporting features help provide visibility into backup status, recovery points, and policy adherence, making audits much easier.

Read full review

Kavya S

Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Continuous replication has protected critical servers and supports seamless disaster recovery drills

Some features that I personally feel can be improved are more simplified monitoring and reporting. As I previously mentioned, the console shows the replication status. If it had more detailed dashboards or built-in reports for DR readiness, it would make it easier for the teams to track everything in one place. Another improvement would be cost visibility and optimization guidance in optimizing the cost and also giving us visibility of it. Because the staging resources and replication storage are running continuously, it would be very helpful for organizations and users if AWS provided clearer cost insights, recommendations, and remediations to optimize the DR environment. It would also be useful if AWS added more automation options for application-level recovery, such as easier ways to handle IP changes, domain name system (DNS) updates, or application dependencies during failover. Additionally, we can simplify the setup and configuration process. For someone new to the service, understanding the staging settings, launch templates, and networking configurations can take some time. Setup simplicity and more detailed monitoring and alerting features would be beneficial. If we could add that, we can easily track the replication health, lag, and potential issues. Instead of relying on other additional tools for monitoring and alerting features, we can rely on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery itself.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Backup?

Pricing for AWS Backup is based on storage and backup frequency. Although it is reasonable, it requires monitoring, especially with long retention periods.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Backup?

AWS Backup could be improved by adding better visibility and reporting features. A more detailed dashboard is required for this service. Another improvement would be faster restore times for large ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Backup?

AWS Backup is used to centrally manage backups for services like EBS volumes, RDS databases, and sometimes EFS, primarily for data protection and compliance purposes. In one specific project, multi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The cost rating was assessed on a scale where 10 represented the most expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

There are areas that could be improved beyond the downtime issues mentioned, and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance several aspects of its functionality.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

This was for the school.

See all answers

Comparisons

Commvault Cloud vs AWS Backup

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs AWS Backup

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Backup

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Backup Competitors

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

DocStar Rebound vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Backup

June 2026

Download AWS Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

June 2026

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Overview

AWS Backup provides centralized management of backups with automated scheduling and cross-region support. It ensures easy restoration and policy-based automation for error reduction while integrating seamlessly with AWS services for efficient data management.

AWS Backup is a cloud-native solution offering a unified platform for managing backups across different AWS services. It supports lifecycle policies, point-in-time recovery, and security vaults. The service is cost-effective with a pay-as-you-go model and is designed for scalability and flexibility. Users benefit from features like snapshots, tagging, and custom plans, which enhance data management strategies. The system supports monitoring, reporting, and compliance to streamline operations, with the ability to manage multiple resources efficiently.

What are the key features of AWS Backup?

Centralized Management: Streamlines backup operations across AWS services.
Automated Scheduling: Efficiently manages backup tasks without manual intervention.
Cross-Region and Cross-Account Support: Enhances data protection and accessibility across regions.
Lifecycle Policies: Enables policy-driven automation to reduce errors.
Point-in-Time Recovery: Facilitates quick data restoration to specific timeframes.
Integration with AWS Services: Provides seamless interaction with other AWS tools.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Pay-as-you-go model reduces upfront and operational costs.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without additional infrastructure.
Data Protection: Advanced features ensure high security and compliance.
Operational Streamlining: Automated tasks and reporting improve efficiency.

AWS Backup is implemented across industries to protect EBS volumes, RDS databases, and more, focusing on data protection and compliance. Organizations utilize it in managing retention policies, disaster recovery, and encryption in hybrid environments, benefiting from tiered storage and efficient backup management.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

TransferWise

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Buyer's Guide

AWS Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

June 2026

Free Report: AWS Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.