

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and AWS Backup compete in disaster recovery and backup services. AWS Backup seems to have the upper hand due to its pay-as-you-go pricing model and ease of use.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery focuses on instant block replication, continuous data protection, and live block verification, offering a scalable cloud-based solution. It minimizes the need for additional hardware. AWS Backup offers snapshot capability, point-in-time recovery, and seamless integration with AWS services, making it suitable for regular backup and restore operations.
Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users request enhanced automation, improved logging, and better client performance stability. They also desire better cost management and less complex failback processes. AWS Backup could benefit from improved database backup capabilities, enhanced integration with backup management tools, and better file-based copying options. Simplification of restore processes and improved hybrid cloud backup are needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports various environments, including on-premises, hybrid, and private clouds. Its technical support is robust, although users suggest a more structured ticketing system. AWS Backup supports public and hybrid clouds, offering straightforward configuration and integration. Users suggest improvements in support and reporting features, with both services receiving positive support feedback.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery features a somewhat complex pricing model involving licenses, AWS environment costs, and storage fees. It offers high ROI through hardware cost savings and versatile deployments. AWS Backup is cheaper with its pay-as-you-go pricing, charging only for storage used. It offers flexibility but could benefit from reduced costs and more transparent pricing. Both solutions are integrated within the AWS ecosystem, offering strong ROI and enhancing operational efficiency.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
The customer service is top-notch, rated ten out of ten.
In the first interaction, I have already provided the logs, and they are asking again and again for the same logs.
The customer support is amazing, and it is the best customer support I have ever had.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 10 out of 10.
AWS Backup is very stable, rating nine out of ten.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
Currently, it only includes around ten services, while AWS offers over three hundred plus services.
Regarding disadvantages of AWS Backup, it can be expensive and not particularly user-friendly.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
Because the replication is continuous and block-level, if a production server is hit by ransomware, the encrypted garbage data is often replicated to the DR site in near-real time.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
AWS Backup has a moderate cost, rated at two or three out of ten regarding pricing.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
pricing is fair, and you pay for the use.
The ability to maintain all backups via one service simplifies compliance with regulations such as NIST, PCI DSS, and HIPAA.
If we encounter any service-related issues, such as when someone accidentally deletes a table in production or testing, we can immediately restore the data from backup.
It is quite easy to manage AWS Backup's centralized console for multiple environments.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 1.3% |
| AWS Backup | 2.4% |
| Other | 96.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
AWS Backup provides centralized management of backups with automated scheduling and cross-region support. It ensures easy restoration and policy-based automation for error reduction while integrating seamlessly with AWS services for efficient data management.
AWS Backup is a cloud-native solution offering a unified platform for managing backups across different AWS services. It supports lifecycle policies, point-in-time recovery, and security vaults. The service is cost-effective with a pay-as-you-go model and is designed for scalability and flexibility. Users benefit from features like snapshots, tagging, and custom plans, which enhance data management strategies. The system supports monitoring, reporting, and compliance to streamline operations, with the ability to manage multiple resources efficiently.
What are the key features of AWS Backup?AWS Backup is implemented across industries to protect EBS volumes, RDS databases, and more, focusing on data protection and compliance. Organizations utilize it in managing retention policies, disaster recovery, and encryption in hybrid environments, benefiting from tiered storage and efficient backup management.
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.