

Commvault Cloud and Azure Site Recovery compete in the backup and disaster recovery category. Commvault Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive data protection and management capabilities across various environments and comprehensive compliance features.
Features: Commvault Cloud offers extensive backup and data protection capabilities across hybrid and multi-cloud environments, focusing on robust security measures and advanced disaster recovery options. Its comprehensive data management and integration support make it ideal for complex infrastructures. Azure Site Recovery is mainly focused on disaster recovery within the Azure ecosystem, highlighting ease of migration and automated synchronization capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Commvault Cloud could improve its user interface consistency across platforms and provide better documentation for smoother onboarding. Pricing models and licensing transparency are needed for better adaptability to organizational needs. Azure Site Recovery could enhance cost predictability and faster, comprehensive support, particularly in scalability and complex recovery scenarios.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Commvault Cloud presents deployment challenges, particularly on-premises, requiring substantial technical expertise. It provides extensive documentation and responsive though inconsistent technical support. Azure Site Recovery has a more straightforward deployment approach, especially in hybrid cloud settings, focusing on integration simplicity. Commvault's customer service excels in certain regions but faces challenges elsewhere due to language and time-zone differences. Azure Site Recovery could improve its multi-region support for consistent service.
Pricing and ROI: Commvault Cloud generally incurs higher costs due to its comprehensive feature set and enterprise focus. Organizations report varied experiences in terms of cost-benefit, with ROI often greater in environments needing extensive data integration. Azure Site Recovery's pricing, driven by usage and cloud resources, can lead to unpredictability but often reflects competitive rates for Azure-centric scenarios. Its ROI is more notable in Azure-centered operations.
Azure Site Recovery, while being pricier than some providers, has a sufficient service level to justify costs.
Azure Site Recovery is time-saving, and its features allow us to automate processes and save resources.
During a global outage that affected our operations, there was no apology or in-depth follow-up from Microsoft.
Microsoft support could be improved as it rates only a five out of ten, with slow response times and a preference for email over phone communication even in severity B cases.
We primarily rely on our Cloud Support Partner for support.
The number of people who know Commvault Cloud is lesser compared to Veeam.
At the pre-sale cycle, we have spocks aligned from Commvault with whom we get in touch, and they provide all the required support that we need.
Customer support has very closed departments, requiring us to shuffle between them to get one thing done because representatives have limited accessibility.
I would rate the scalability of Azure Site Recovery as a nine out of ten.
Scalability is provided because they are offering 99.95% availability.
Azure Site Recovery is a very scalable product and service mechanism.
The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations.
I would rate the stability of Azure Site Recovery at eight to nine out of ten.
I have not faced any downtimes with Commvault Cloud.
Commvault Cloud is highly stable, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
If their agent version is mismatched and the health status is critical, you will not be able to perform your Azure Site Recovery.
There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages.
Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options.
I would like to see AI capabilities in Commvault Cloud.
I feel that the support is not yet up to the mark, with not enough professional engineers to provide assistance.
It was not the expensive part of our costs.
A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site.
The pricing of Azure Site Recovery is around a four out of ten, being somewhat cost-effective.
Commvault Cloud is expensive, and there is room for the price to be 10-15 percent lower than what they are charging currently.
Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.
Azure provides a 99.99% SLA for their uptime, ensuring that even during outages due to patch releases, there is no data loss, merely hindered accessibility.
The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery.
We can back up unlimited TBs due to our per node license.
Other features include endpoint solutions, integration with Office 365, ransomware protection, archival for long-term retention, and no ingress or egress charges.
The public cloud acts as a bigger solution for the on-premise while the on-premise acts as a DR for the public cloud workloads.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Site Recovery | 9.9% |
| Commvault Cloud | 7.7% |
| Other | 82.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 57 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 82 |
Azure Site Recovery ensures seamless disaster recovery with features like scalability, automated file synchronization, real-time dashboards, and secure processes. It achieves a 99.99% uptime SLA and is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly interface.
Azure Site Recovery is a comprehensive disaster recovery service featuring load-balancing, fast snapshots, and native Azure integration for reliable performance. It manages virtual machine synchronization with seamless failover and data consistency, aiding in reducing secondary site expenses. With its robust architecture, the service supports organizations in maintaining business continuity, meeting regulatory compliance, and minimizing downtime through regular failover drills. Its implementation often capitalizes on Azure's reliability, ensuring infrastructure uptime and reduced hardware requirements.
What are the essential features of Azure Site Recovery?Organizations in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Azure Site Recovery for its robust disaster recovery capabilities. The service navigates regulatory challenges with ease, aiding businesses in data duplication, VMware replication, and infrastructure backup. Its efficiency is leveraged to maintain critical systems during outages, facilitating business continuity and operational stability.
Commvault Cloud offers comprehensive data management with strong backup and recovery, security, and compliance across hybrid and multi-cloud setups. Supporting a variety of applications, its cost optimization and integration capabilities enhance data management and infrastructure operations.
Commvault Cloud facilitates seamless data management and protection for organizations dealing with complex IT infrastructures. Its capabilities spread across hybrid and multi-cloud environments, ensuring robust disaster recovery and compliance, while optimizing storage strategies. Extensive application compatibility and integration with IT infrastructure solutions allow for efficient data movement and enhanced security.
What are the key features of Commvault Cloud?In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Commvault Cloud supports the protection of virtual machines, databases, and physical systems. It facilitates Office 365, SQL, and VMware backups, ensuring disaster recovery and compliance, while meeting the demanding storage requirements and safeguarding data integrity per industry standards.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.