Our clients use this solution for monitoring and configuration purposes.
The deployment model varies from client to client.
Our clients use this solution for monitoring and configuration purposes.
The deployment model varies from client to client.
The dashboard needs some minor improvements. Sometimes it is difficult to find items, other times it is quick, it just depends. Most of the feedback we receive are not complaints but suggestions or ideas about the dashboard.
The stability could be improved.
We have some glitches once in a while. There are times where it's a little bit slow or a bit delayed.
We have not had to scale yet, we are normally working with a fixed size. We haven't had to worry about upsizing or downsizing.
For our purposes, we are not using this, but on the client-side, we have anywhere from two to eight users, they are made up of technicians, support staff, and engineers.
For me, the initial setup was easy and straightforward, but for some of our customers who are not as familiar with networking, it can be complicated.
For a technical person, it is straightforward. Of course, now and then you have to look in the manual and read it, as nothing is completely self intuitive.
Deployment can take anywhere from one to five days, depending on the requirements.
We require two employees for deployments.
We implement this solution ourselves.
There is no favorite function or feature, it depends on what you have to do and how you do it.
My advice regarding this solution is to understand your network, definitely have a look in the manual, understand the structure and don't just rely on trial and error. It's not target-aiming, so trial and error will not work.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
High availability and sustainable network is a prime and foremost obligatory requirement of ERP deployment, Cisco layer 2-4 switches deliver the best when robust, secured, sub- netted and resilient network is concerned.
Strong Areas:
The Catalyst switches give ease of configuration with a comprehensive set of management protocol support such as Telnet, HTTP, CLI, SNMP and much more with software's like CMS (Cluster Management Suite) and Ciscoworks, all together. Conventional Fast Ethernet to Gigabit Ethernet connectivity with outstanding QoS, stackable and fixed configuration, security features like static VLAN support and in Linux OS ,TACACS with Radius Dial in authentication support where environment of installation of device(Switch) is harsh , less maintained temperature and less manageable environment like Tertiary care hospitals, Universities, Call centers, Tech labs and SMB’s where limited manpower is the major factor in considerations. Productivity of mid line layer 2 switches (Catalyst 2950G) can be coupled by using in conjunction with Catalyst 4506 Ethernet layer 3 switch acting as core of the IP routing. 2 x GBIC I/O slots (standard) for gigabit Ethernet and single mode fiber channel is one of the distinct specialties in sub- netted network, they offer.
Possible Cons:
Cost is one of the substantial aspect for layer 2 supported devices like catalyst WS-2900 series as compared to HP networking device with HP 2900 series. Yes cisco is little higher in cost but in return cisco offer resilience, reliability and dependable network for any application
Though Cisco provides lifetime limited warranty for their products like WS-2950G -48 switch, but HP 2900 series is shipped with “As long as you owned the device with advance replacement in a very short time.”
My experience is with a gigabit network of 467 active nodes spanned across 29 Catalyst WS-2950G-48 switches and inter-VLAN routed through Catalyst 4506 layer 3 switches with fiber optic backbone. Beside this I have had the experience of using HP 2920 switches which are less rugged and require a temperature moderated environment with less resilience as compare to Cisco 2950.
DNA Center is very interesting in automating the setup and monitoring as with each occurrence it gets easier to troubleshoot and provides an impression about what could be the problem.
Location of customers to connect clients to the servers and transport the data and VoIP in parallel with QoS and NBAR with 802.1X.
Versatility and streamlined IOS
Availability of expertise on the market (resources)
Streamlined IOS helped to develop templates for Ethernet Switches without worrying of compatibility of commands in regards to hardware platforms.
Modularity of Industrial switches (IE3000) provides flexibility in solutions yet based on one platform.
Vast array of Industrial models (IE2000, IE3000, IE4000, IE5000).
Acceptance of open source trends (there is slight move already - just keep going)
10 years overall for all switching/routing products. Industrial switches for last 5 years.
No
No
Well, need more pro-active option to add PoE modules to Industrial switches.
We deal with a Cisco partner - 4.5 out of 5.
Technical Support:We deal with a Cisco partner - 4.0 out of 5. Sometimes we find the solution before we get an answer from the Cisco partner.
Everything is driven by business requirements, which in turn different from one project to another. Major points are: availability of support/expertise beyond internal resources, territorial coverage, performance and support of multiple options from enterprise to industrial environment
Straightforward.
90 % in house. Vendor team has sufficient skills.
Cisco should look into more flexible licensing for hardware/IOS. It is hard to beat some vendors' lifetime warranty even they offer less in functionality compare to Cisco.
There are multiple vendors but they are very specialized and do not support versatile solutions. For example, we had to move from Schneider switches as they were just a marketing move by vendor and did not provided better performance or compatibility with SCADA products.
Start from your business requirements (what would you like to have) and budget (what can you afford).
Competitive strength – Cisco and Juniper are a good fit in any data centre.
Competitive weaknesses –
Current Perspective –
Strength and weaknesses
Convergence
Support for various dynamic IP routing protocols and the ability to slot in additional modules while the switch is running.
Modules are hot swappable, as you have dual power supplies, as well as support for various dynamic IP routing protocols.
Nothing that I can think of. If you want to improve, you have the choice to upgrade the hardware.
I've used it for four years.
No issues encountered.
It's been very stable since deployment.
It's very scalable, as you just need to buy new modules, and slot them in as and when required.
Excellent customer service.
Technical Support:I never had an issue yet with this product which required TAC intervention but from my previous experience Cisco TAC support is the best.
We previously used 3com switches, and we switched to Cisco in order to standardize our network hardware.
It's easy to deploy if you know what you are doing, and do proper planning. For me, it was pretty straightforward. I have years of experience on Cisco products.
It was an in-house deployment.
It's high.
It's worth the price you pay.
We considered using Cisco 3700 series switches and stacking them.
It's best for access layer deployment.
In my experience, the cisco devices do handle extremes quite well, I've worked with millitary deployable kit thats dropped off trucks or out of aircraft, or in mine sites with unstable power and numerous other nasties. The biggest issue with these kinds of environments is dust and extreme temperatures, or in the outback the bull dust, being sucked through the machines, not an issue until moisture is also incurred. All vendor network devices will suffer under those forms of conditions, but the Cisco kit still seems to keep ticking even with that sort of harsh treatment. Can't say what the Cisco RMA returns engineers would think on opening up a returned device thats full of bulldust though, I'd assume that might void the warranty :-).
DNA is relatively new product even it gets use of some matured features in the background. But it is quite a change on how we do access layer management. What I like about the solution, I could preserve my investment in the legacy hardware when deploy DNA. Older switches (not all - please, consult feature support for Cisco equipment) could be integrated into DNA matrix.