3scale API Management vs Apache APISIX comparison

Red Hat and Apache are both solutions in the API Management category. Red Hat is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.8, while Apache is ranked #30. Red Hat holds a 2.3% mindshare in APIM, compared to Apache’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Apache users who would recommend it.

3scale API Management

Read 11 3scale API Management reviews

3,245 Views
2,419 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Apache APISIX

Read 1 Apache APISIX review

2,603 Views
2,495 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

3scale API Management

Apache APISIX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 3scale API Management and Apache APISIX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management.

To learn more, read our detailed API Management Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

API Management

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

3scale API Management

Ranking in API Management

17th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Apache APISIX

Ranking in API Management

30th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of 3scale API Management is 2.3%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apache APISIX is 3.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

KavitaChavan

Associate Manager at Baariz

Lightweight solution but less flexible customization features

It lacks some features, and the product is not that flexible for developers. It's less flexible and rigid. It's not easy to make changes or customize it. One disadvantage is that for customization, it uses liquid templates. However, not everyone is familiar with liquid templates, so if you want to do some customized logging or other tasks, you may need to struggle a lot. Other solutions like IBM API Connect or Apigee use JavaScript, which is more developer-friendly. That's what I found.

Read full review

Ahmed_Sayed

Senior Java Software Developer at VOIS

Integration with backend systems and runtime configuration simplicity enhance operational efficiency

Apache APISIX ( /products/apache-apisix-reviews ) is easy to configure. It supports coding for filters and can integrate with many languages. Its configuration at runtime is very easy. You can configure your gateway at runtime without needing to restart the gateway to apply configurations. This is a perfect feature. The service discovery feature integrates with backend systems and provides powerful load balancing. Also, its integration with Keycloak and authorization systems is a valuable feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's good that they aren't adding a lot of features like ESP, etc. It's okay with just being a gateway."

"3scale API Management's best feature is API management."

"I like the API automation."

"To me, the most valuable feature of 3scale API Management is that it lets you add a backend to the product. I also like that you can integrate it well with OpenShift clusters, making 3scale API Management a useful solution."

"The most valuable features are the gateway and security features."

"The standard deployment is very simple."

"The solution is quite lightweight, and the installation is very easy. It's like a two-click installation."

"The product is stable."

More 3scale API Management pros

"I recommend Apache APISIX to others because of its many useful features."

Cons

"It would be helpful to improve the customization features so that the customer can do it based on their own needs."

"The product is not that flexible for developers. It's less flexible and rigid. It's not easy to make changes or customize it."

"I believe the CMS part of it has room for improvement though. That is where you write a couple of things if you want to publish your API. It's based on liquid scripting, which doesn't seem like the obvious ones to script with."

"The user experience could be better. The developer portal is too complex and hard to configure."

"What I'd like to improve in 3scale API Management is its route-limiting feature. Currently, I don't know how to do that effectively on the solution, but in Kong, I know how to do it, so I would love to see route-limiting being easily done on 3scale API Management. It would also be good if there was some authentication that you could do from 3scale API Management because Kong offers that functionality out of the box. What I'd love to see in the next release of 3scale API Management is the ability to integrate more plug-ins easily onto the platform, so you'll be able to extend it, and even do customs management. If Red Hat could offer that extension where it allows the internal organization where 3scale API Management is deployed on-premise to integrate its tools on top of 3scale API Management and provide an API for that, that will make the solution very powerful."

"We tried to use the portal, but we decided that it wasn't enough. The content management system (CMS) is not easy to use if you want to customize things, and it's hard to get someone who has the knowledge to work with the CMS."

"What was suggested by Red Hat was a crucial part of the configuration, but when we started to ask about the supportability of this configuration, Red Hat said only some parts of the configuration would be supported."

"3scale API Management only supports restful APIs and doesn't support SOAP."

"The user interface is limited and does not support all features of Apache APISIX."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost was around $45,000 per year."

"3scale API Management has reasonable pricing, judging from its competitor, Kong. My organization pays yearly for the 3scale API Management license, though I'm unable to give the exact figure because every single day there are new clusters deployed. I'm in charge of three to four clusters in my team, but give or take, it costs a few thousand lakhs."

"I don't think that 3scale is very expensive."

"The pricing is affordable, it's cheap."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about 3scale API Management?

The product is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for 3scale API Management?

I rate the product’s pricing as two out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with 3scale API Management?

The deployment process could be easier.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apigee vs 3scale API Management

Compared 17% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs 3scale API Management

Compared 15% of the time

IBM API Connect vs 3scale API Management

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs 3scale API Management

Compared 14% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs 3scale API Management

Compared 2% of the time

More 3scale API Management Competitors

WSO2 API Manager vs Apache APISIX

Compared 23% of the time

Apigee vs Apache APISIX

Compared 18% of the time

Traefik Enterprise vs Apache APISIX

Compared 14% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Apache APISIX

Compared 10% of the time

SwaggerHub vs Apache APISIX

Compared 1% of the time

More Apache APISIX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

March 2025

Download 3scale API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

March 2025

Download Apache APISIX product report

Overview

3scale is an API management platform that delivers flexible, highly scalable solutions to package, distribute, control, and monetize your APIs, giving you the power to make the most of your API program.

Share company data, content, or services through Web or mobile applications.
Provide an API to external organizations, internal teams, or both.
Avoid the hassle and constant maintenance of building a solution from scratch.

3scale delivers centralized API management features through a distributed, cloud-hosted layer. The platform includes built-in features to help you build a more successful API program, including access control, rate limits, payment gateway integration, and developer experience tools.

Red Hat

Apache APISIX is an open-source API Gateway that supports dynamic routing, plugins, and load balancing. It is highly scalable and suitable for managing, securing, and efficiently controlling API traffic. Users appreciate its flexible and robust capabilities.

Developed for developers and businesses seeking to optimize API management, Apache APISIX offers a range of features tailored to improve performance and adaptability. With support for real-time dynamic updates and a broad plugin ecosystem, it can easily integrate into diverse architectures. This tool caters to a range of use cases, from boosting API efficiency to refining load balancing and traffic management.

What are the key features of Apache APISIX?

Dynamic Routing: Enables users to modify routes without service disruption.
Plugin Framework: Allows the addition of custom features to enhance functionality.
HTTPS and SSL Termination: Increases security for API communications.
Load Balancing: Distributes traffic to optimize resource usage.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers real-time insights into API performance.

What benefits should users consider?

Scalability: Quickly adapts to increasing traffic demands.
Performance Enhancement: Optimizes API speed and responsiveness.
Reduced Downtime: Maintains stability with updates and changes.
Security: Enhances protection with strong encryption protocols.

Apache APISIX is widely implemented across industries, including finance and e-commerce, where it manages large volumes of transactions efficiently. Its adaptability allows it to meet specific industry needs, supporting businesses in achieving optimal API performance and security.

Apache

Sample Customers

Victor Ops, Coca Cola, The Telegraph, Skava, Orange, Typeform

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.