ACCELQ Automate vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

ACCELQ and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. ACCELQ is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. ACCELQ holds a 1.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ACCELQ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

ACCELQ Automate

Read 1 ACCELQ Automate review

760 Views
760 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

3,113 Views
2,802 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ACCELQ Automate

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

ACCELQ Automate and UiPath Test Cloud compete in test automation. ACCELQ Automate holds an advantage in ease of use and flexibility, while UiPath Test Cloud offers comprehensive capabilities and overall value.

Features: ACCELQ Automate offers uncomplicated automation processes, AI-driven execution, and codeless automation. UiPath Test Cloud provides comprehensive integration, detailed analytics, and support for complex workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ACCELQ Automate provides swift deployment and robust customer assistance. UiPath Test Cloud has an intricate deployment process with extensive customer resources and technical support.

Pricing and ROI: ACCELQ Automate presents a cost-effective setup appealing to budget-conscious teams with quicker ROI. UiPath Test Cloud might have higher initial costs but offers scalable solutions promising comprehensive ROI through automation efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACCELQ Automate

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (5th), Test Management Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of ACCELQ Automate is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.1%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	4.1%
ACCELQ Automate	1.4%
Other	94.5%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature

We evaluated data testing for millions of records. As per architecture, it can efficiently run a few thousands of records. However, we couldn't implement it for millions of records. Thus, it works well for a small amount of data. We have 30 users for it in our organization and use it daily. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop. This allows us to create different suites in TestManager, schedule them, and integrate them with CI/CD."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

"It is a very scalable product."

"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"Its price is a bit high."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACCELQ Automate?

The platform contributes to faster test release cycles.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACCELQ Automate?

I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACCELQ Automate?

The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details. Additionally, there could be a capability to automatically generate automation scripts extracting the user data fr...

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 24% of the time

Testsigma vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 19% of the time

LEAPWORK vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 11% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 7% of the time

More ACCELQ Automate Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 30% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download ACCELQ Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

January 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

The most powerful test automation tool for web, desktop, mainframes and more.

ACCELQ

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

FISCHER, optanix, ERICSSON, BenifitMall, QuickPivot, DIGITALFUEL, westcreek

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.