No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Accruent Maintenance Connection vs GP MaTe comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Accruent Maintenance Connec...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS) (5th)
GP MaTe
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (29th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Facility and Asset Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Accruent Maintenance Connection is designed for Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS) and holds a mindshare of 5.5%, up 4.3% compared to last year.
GP MaTe, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), holds 1.4% mindshare, up 1.0% since last year.
Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Accruent Maintenance Connection5.5%
MaintainX9.6%
Cryotos CMMS6.1%
Other78.8%
Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS)
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GP MaTe1.4%
IBM Maximo Application Suite12.6%
Infor CloudSuite6.8%
Other79.2%
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
 

Also Known As

No data available
GP MaTe
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Blue Apron, Bridgestone, Cree, Fastenal Company, Five Hour Energy, Mercedes Benz, Nissan, Procter and Gamble, SSAB, Aramark, AT&T, Crest Foods, DirecTV, Gap, LifeSouth Community Blood Centers, Laureate Group, Maine Medical Center, Novartis, Nusil
Schindler Elevator, Hyster, Mueller Metals Co., Ashland, Shintech, Pennsylvania State University, Mekong Energy, Pratt & Whitney Power Systems, Wood Group