Acronis Cyber Infrastructure vs Azure Local comparison

Acronis and Microsoft are both solutions in the HCI category. Acronis is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.6. Acronis holds a 1.2% mindshare in HCI, compared to Microsoft’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Acronis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Acronis Cyber Infrastructure

Read 6 Acronis Cyber Infrastructure reviews

653 Views
653 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Local

Read 8 Azure Local reviews

2,442 Views
2,442 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acronis Cyber Infrastructure

Azure Local

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 21, 2026

Acronis Cyber Infrastructure and Azure Local are competing solutions in infrastructure management. Azure Local appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and integration capabilities that justify its higher cost.

Features: Acronis Cyber Infrastructure is known for its reliable data protection, scalability, and flexibility, making it suitable for diverse IT environments. Azure Local distinguishes itself with extensive integration options, advanced security features, and powerful analytics tools, catering to broader enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: Acronis could enhance its integration capabilities and analytics tools to better compete in larger enterprise environments. It may also benefit from improving its advanced security features. Azure Local could improve its deployment process to reduce complexity, enhance some specific backup retrieval processes, and further streamline its migration tools for greater ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acronis Cyber Infrastructure is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, making setup smoother. Azure Local's deployment can be complex, but Microsoft's strong customer service and technical support help mitigate this challenge effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Infrastructure offers cost-effective initial setup aimed at quick ROI, appealing to smaller enterprises or budget-conscious buyers. Azure Local involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its feature-rich offerings and providing long-term value for larger organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Acronis Cyber Infrastructure vs. Azure Local Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Acronis Cyber Infrastructure vs. Azure Local

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acronis Cyber Infrastructure

Ranking in HCI

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azure Local

Ranking in HCI

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the HCI category, the mindshare of Acronis Cyber Infrastructure is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Local is 3.8%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

HCI Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Local	3.8%
Acronis Cyber Infrastructure	1.2%
Other	95.0%

HCI

Featured Reviews

Sahan Hettiarachchi

Associate Product Executive at Connex Information Technologies

Integrated cybersecurity and backup have improved ransomware resilience and simplified recovery

In my opinion, it would be better if Acronis expanded their integration with multiple products. Right now, backup and mail backup are only limited to M365 and Google. Most of the customers in my country use hosted servers or cPanel, IceWarp, and other small office and home office email solutions. If they can expand that integration, it would be helpful. Making it even better would be if they have an industrial-level backup solution with multiple integrations and multiple backup capabilities that their competitor has. This would allow us to focus on one singular license for backup and confidently position it to an enterprise-level environment, such as a data center-level environment.

Read full review

Martin Coloumbe

IT Solution Architect at a educational organization with 11-50 employees

Experience with seamless cost-saving capacity, though integration and support need refinement

An area that could be possibly improved with Azure Stack HCI is the stretched cluster functionality, which was included in version 23H2 for disaster recovery purposes. However, this functionality has been put on hold for the next release, and Microsoft has decided to discontinue stretched cluster technology completely, which is disappointing. They promise to bring back a significant or similar solution in a future release, but currently, there is no such functionality for stretched clusters between two sites in the latest versions of Azure Stack HCI, which poses a problem as we were looking forward to utilizing it. The integration with Azure Arc provides a unified management experience, but I find it to be fairly clunky. The integration exists, but it is not smooth or very easy to use. While they've started to integrate the two, the integration lacks maturity and makes it difficult to manage effectively. There are discrepancies between managing VMs through Azure Arc versus managing them directly, as changes made not using the Azure Arc integration are not easily reflected in Azure Arc. For instance, if I have an Arc-enabled VM and make changes to it outside the Arc interface, those changes may not be registered directly in Azure Arc, leading to issues in fully viewing the status and configuration of VMs depending on the management tool used. You either manage VMs fully through Arc or not at all because mixing the two methods results in incomplete visibility and inconsistencies.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of Acronis Cyber Infrastructure is how it backs up files in a user-friendly manner."

"Because they have multiple solutions integrated into one license, we can justify the cost."

"The most valuable feature of Acronis Cyber Infrastructure is the multi-tenancy model, we can create customers and services for them."

"The technical support provided by Acronis is great."

"The most valuable features are the full image backup, and the file or document sharing, allowing documents to be easily accessed from anywhere."

"The most valuable feature is the backup capability."

"The reporting and auditing features of Acronis Cyber Infrastructure are the most effective for data protection; it has a single console management system, and all products are integrated into one console, which makes it very efficient."

"The scalability is extremely good."

"In my hybrid cloud setup, there are three features I've found very efficient. The first is software-defined networking. Similar to Azure where you create virtual networks and software load balancing, Azure Stack HCI lets you configure them with a drag-and-drop experience on the on-premises cluster. That's one of the good feature."

"Azure Stack HCI has been very beneficial for disaster recovery operations, though the main data center still has a mix of infrastructure between other products."

"Azure Local, formerly known as Azure Stack HCI, is gaining attention due to its offering of a cloud experience on-premises."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to manage VMs."

"The solution has the latest processor."

"The integration with Azure using Azure Arc is excellent."

"Some of the best features of Azure Stack HCI are that, as we are primarily a Microsoft Windows Server organization using Microsoft Windows Server on most of our servers, we already own data center licenses for Microsoft operating systems, and the hypervisor, Azure Stack HCI, actually comes with that license, which allows us to switch from VMware to Azure Stack HCI without any additional cost, significantly reducing our operational costs, especially now that Broadcom has purchased VMware, to $0."

More Azure Local pros

Cons

"If they could make improvements with the virtual environment then it would be better."

"The only downside is when comparing backup scenarios. Veeam has much more backup capabilities for data center and enterprise environments, but Acronis only focuses on SMBs and mid-level markets."

"Backing up Azure resources is an area where there's room for improvement, as they are not fully covered yet."

"I would like to see real-time backup supported in the next release of this solution."

"Acronis Cyber Infrastructure is too populated. They have many features, but some features are still missing, it is not complete. They need to improve many features, such as email security and disaster recovery."

"The implementation was very difficult for the operation team at that time, as the necessary skills to implement and integrate this product were not available."

"We faced multiple problems with the product’s stability."

"Hyper V seems to lag behind compared to VMware."

"The product's initial setup phase can be a bit complex, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The biggest challenge with the tool is not being able to manage everything from Microsoft Azure Portal."

"There are a lot of areas for improvement. Since I've been working very closely with this product, there are many areas, especially in software-defined networking. We had to improve multiple areas because we depended on the service fabric cluster to manage the software-defined network. That means we're already running a hypervisor inside a VM, and we're managing the control plane of the software-defined network. That's another cluster. So, multiple layers make the complexity more. So, from an operational perspective, it's very difficult to manage."

"A little bit of the storage architecture could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is on the high side and the subscription is renewed every year."

"We pay monthly for the use of Acronis Cyber Infrastructure. There are additional features that we use that have an extra fee."

"The pricing is high compared to other tools."

"The main licenses are the OS licenses, the OEM licenses, and so on. They are very much aligned with the cost of expectations. We never had any challenges with the licensing at all."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acronis Cyber Infrastructure?

Compared to the products in the market, Acronis is very affordable. Because they have multiple solutions integrated into one license, we can justify the cost. It is affordable within region-wise po...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Acronis Cyber Infrastructure?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acronis Cyber Infrastructure?

I am working with Acronis, and I have experience with Veeam Backup for VMware and similar technologies. I have experience with VMware configuration from vSphere and backup, replication, and related...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Stack HCI?

The solution has the latest processor.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Stack HCI?

This solution costs €10 per core per month. The whole stack is free if you are renting Windows Server Datacenter.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Stack HCI?

There could be improvements with Azure Stack HCI regarding the license and price, as they have significantly higher prices compared to other competitors. The end-to-end encryption provided by Azure...

See all answers

Comparisons

Atlantis Hyperscale vs Acronis Cyber Infrastructure

Compared 11% of the time

DataCore SANsymphony vs Acronis Cyber Infrastructure

Compared 11% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Acronis Cyber Infrastructure

Compared 9% of the time

StarWind Virtual SAN vs Acronis Cyber Infrastructure

Compared 9% of the time

VMware vSAN vs Acronis Cyber Infrastructure

Compared 4% of the time

More Acronis Cyber Infrastructure Competitors

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Azure Local

Compared 18% of the time

VMware vSAN vs Azure Local

Compared 15% of the time

Lenovo ThinkAgile HX Series vs Azure Local

Compared 6% of the time

VxRail vs Azure Local

Compared 6% of the time

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure vs Azure Local

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure Local Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HCI

March 2026

Download Acronis Cyber Infrastructure product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Local

March 2026

Download Azure Local product report

Overview

The Acronis Cyber Infrastructure Appliance is a ready-to-use cyber protection solution that combines proven and tested hardware and software in one easy to install and operate unit. The Acronis Cyber Infrastructure Appliance is currently available in selected countries.

Acronis

Azure Local integrates on-premises infrastructure with cloud services, offering tools for software-defined networking, Kubernetes deployment, and VM management. It ensures cost efficiency through existing Microsoft licenses and robust disaster recovery, despite some complexities in deployment.

Azure Local is designed for businesses needing a blend of local and cloud services while remaining compliant with data privacy regulations. It excels in environments demanding high computing power, software-defined networking, and seamless scaling through Azure Kubernetes Service and Azure DevOps. Although it offers excellent VM management and analytics capabilities with Microsoft Fabric, deployment complexity and operational challenges remain. Businesses looking for a robust edge computing solution find significant benefits, especially with efficient local Azure storage and advanced hardware such as the latest processors and SSDs. There are areas needing improvements like multi-cluster management, stability, and Initial setup, which can be cumbersome. Pricing can be a concern against competitors, and enhanced support and training are needed for smoother user experience.

What are the key features of Azure Local?

Software-Defined Networking: Facilitates management with drag-and-drop setup.
Kubernetes Deployment: Provides Azure Kubernetes Service for managing microservices.
VM Management: Reduces server count and enhances efficiency.
Integration with Azure Arc: Seamless collaboration with Azure Arc for hybrid deployments.
Infrastructure as Code: Utilizes Azure DevOps for deployment.
Analytics Capabilities: Microsoft Fabric enhances insights and decision-making.

What benefits should businesses expect from Azure Local?

Cost Efficiency: Leverages existing Microsoft licenses for financial savings.
Improved Disaster Recovery: Advanced edge computing features bolster resiliency.
High Performance: Enhanced by the latest processors and SSDs for demanding applications.
Seamless Cloud Integration: Smooth transition capabilities between local and cloud environments.

Azure Local finds application in sectors like manufacturing and maritime operations where robust edge computing helps in seamless data management and analytics. Factories benefit from compliance with data privacy rules while blended local and cloud services improve efficiency on ships, providing an alternative to VMware with support for virtual desktops and SQL Managed Instances.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Computol, dmi Networking

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Acronis Cyber Infrastructure vs. Azure Local

March 2026

Free Report: Acronis Cyber Infrastructure vs. Azure Local

Find out what your peers are saying about Acronis Cyber Infrastructure vs. Azure Local and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acronis Cyber Infrastructure vs. Azure Local report.

See our list of best HCI vendors.

We monitor all HCI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.