Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Actian and Seeburger are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Additionally, 50% of Actian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Seeburger users who would recommend it.

Actian Pervasive Data Integ...

Read 6 Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

10,055 Views
3,620 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Actian Pervasive Data Integ...

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, IBM, Salesforce and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.

To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Actian Pervasive Data Integ...

Average Rating

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (12th), API Management (26th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)

Featured Reviews

BI Shnu Bhatta

Associate Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

It is stable and we did not have any issues with initial setup. I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version to support the wide range of sources available.

I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME) I have been using it for 6-7 months. There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability…

Read full review

Shaik Saifuddin

Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech

Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration

The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is extremely useful and better than building an in-house solution."

"For data transfers and ETLs on Windows, this is a great product."

"There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."

"We have been using it for ETL, it is very robust and easy to use."

"Web based interface."

"The platform has been very consistent and responsive."

"It's nice to have that in one system, versus using multiple systems, and it has also increased the level of efficiency in our company's operations by about 30 to 40 percent because everything is on one tool, supporting many people at the same time, worldwide."

"The solution helps us automate processes, more on the insurance side. Where they used to have to babysit monthly files, because of size, they don't have to do that with SEEBURGER BIS. They just run the monthly process. Files get collected, translated, and sent to the proper systems, so the babysitting is gone."

"We minimized our complexity and decreased the number of systems to communicate with our partners, yielding cost savings and a centralized platform that serves as the gate to our suppliers and customers."

"What would have been a manual process of transmitting data items around between us and third-parties has been automated. SEEBURGER BIS handles the automation and mapping side of the communications. The automation, along with the efficiency around time and cost, has improved our organization. Around 20,000 messages a month have been automated. These typically would be financial/order transactions and confirmations in invoicing that have been automated."

"One of the most valuable features is the option to have all integration patterns constantly updated in one platform. That is the main strength I see in using SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). It means I can use a very old-fashioned pattern, combined with a very modern pattern. There are no limitations in terms of combining components because all the components simply fit together."

"It is a JavaScript or a Java-based system within their mapping tool. You can actually write a lot of code in there. We can perform a lot of the translations even within our mapping, whereas we used to have to do custom programming on our back-end systems to fully integrate."

"What improved was the ability to bring on who we wanted when we wanted to at the pace we wanted to."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

Cons

"At the moment, we can't even use it for 1, since it keeps failing in our QA testing."

"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."

"Technical support is an area which can definitely improve."

"The areas which I think need to be improved are the transform and load steps."

"The initial setup is not the straightforward. It took couple of months for us to set up."

"The product is not integrated very well with different cloud providers. We did work with the vendor to build a solution for Amazon, but there is no solution for other cloud providers like Google or Azure. The vendor needs to create adapters so that if we have a requirement to transfer data from our data center to another cloud, outside of Amazon, we would be delighted with that."

"We use a SQL database and believe they can do better when it comes working with large databases."

"The solution's documentation is not up to the mark and needs to be improved."

"The documentation can be improved."

"We've lost a little bit of that personalization — someone who might know our business more."

"In some of the other tools out there in the market, you can create one service and use that service without creating a copy. That kind of capability currently doesn't exist in this solution."

"Their technical support is okay. It doesn't blow you away."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing seems to be competitive and the maintenance is standard."

"Pricing, compared to the tool that we had earlier, is cheaper."

"They have options for every budget. You can book Cloud Services, starting with a few hundred Euros per year or month, depending on what you want, or you can even buy huge landscapes and operate them on your own. The pricing is fair compared to others."

"We pay maintenance of between $75,000 and $100,000 per year, per box."

"There is a standard agreement for the messaging every month. But if we make a change request — a change to a mapping or something like that — then there is a fixed price per hour."

"I find the pricing expensive. But I know that when we evaluated another company, it was about the same. That just seems to be the market. It's probably not expensive overall."

"Pricing has always seemed fair."

"The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

SSIS vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle BI Applications vs Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL]

Compared 2% of the time

More Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] Competitors

IBM B2B Integrator vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

October 2026

Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] report

Download Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

October 2026

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Also Known As

Pervasive Data Integrator, PDI

SEEBURGER BIS

Overview

Pervasive's Data Integrator platform is a robust enterprise data integration software solution that enables you to quickly build powerful and frictionless connections between any kind of data source and application.

Actian

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a versatile platform supporting multiple integration patterns with rich adapters and easy Java coding, known for fault tolerance and seamless SAP integration.

SEEBURGER offers extensive EDI capabilities and adaptability across protocols. The platform provides tools for entity flow, data mapping, message tracking, and high-volume performance. Appreciated for reliability, scalability, and automation, it enables independent adaptation, maintaining stability in efficient data communication. However, handling large datasets can be challenging. Users desire improved cloud and API integration, enhanced error handling, and more accessible training resources. Frequent updates and new features are valued, but customization can be slow, and support experiences are inconsistent.

What are the most important features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Flexible Integration: Supports multiple integration patterns and protocols.
Rich Adapter Suite: Extensive adapter options available.
Seamless SAP Integration: Enables smooth SAP processes.
EDI Capabilities: Comprehensive electronic data interchange support.
Fault Tolerance: Maintains stability and reliable operation.
Entity Flow Tools: Provides detailed data mapping and message tracking.

What benefits may organizations look for in reviews when evaluating SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Reliability: Ensures consistent performance across platforms.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data and organizational needs.
Automation: Reduces need for programming expertise.
Protocol Adaptability: Supports diverse communication standards.

In industries, SEEBURGER is used for EDI transactions, partner communication, and data integration. Organizations benefit from scripting, process monitoring, certifications, and secure transfers like AS2 and SFTP, facilitating data conversion and internal connections. Implemented on-premises and in the cloud, SEEBURGER adapts to custom business processes.

Seeburger

Sample Customers

Pediatrix Medical Group

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, IBM, Salesforce and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.