Acunetix vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Invicti and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while Spirent is ranked #45. Invicti holds a 2.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 33 Acunetix reviews

3,069 Views
2,419 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

223 Views
123 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Spirent CyberFlood are both respected tools in cybersecurity testing. Acunetix seems to have the upper hand in affordability and web vulnerability detection, while Spirent CyberFlood stands out with advanced testing capabilities and feature diversity.

Features: Acunetix features comprehensive vulnerability scanning that enhances security assessments, automated testing for efficient security audits, and a focus on web vulnerability detection. Spirent CyberFlood offers robust network performance testing, security validation features that enhance network resilience, and diverse testing capabilities for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix users suggest improvements in scan speed to avoid delays, reporting functions for better insights, and integration capabilities. Spirent CyberFlood users call for expanded integration with other systems, enhanced usability for easier navigation, and improvements in interface design to reduce the learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is straightforward to deploy, praised for its intuitive setup process, coupled with a responsive support team offering quick issue resolution. Spirent CyberFlood provides comprehensive deployment options, although some users face a steeper learning curve, yet they benefit from detailed guidance and support during implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix provides competitive pricing structures, making it appealing to budget-conscious businesses who report favorable ROI. Spirent CyberFlood, though perceived as higher-priced, delivers compelling ROI through its detailed testing capabilities, emphasizing feature richness and value.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (22nd), DevSecOps (6th)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

45th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."

"It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"Picks up weaknesses in our app setups."

"The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications. So that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have."

"The features of Acunetix have proved most effective in identifying vulnerabilities."

"It's very user-friendly for the testing teams. It's very easy for them to understand things and to fix vulnerabilities."

More Acunetix pros

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

Cons

"The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."

"You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing."

"I had some issues with the JSON parameters where it found some strange vulnerabilities, but it didn't alert the person using it or me about these vulnerabilities, e.g., an error for SQL injection."

"Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS."

"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

More Acunetix cons

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing. The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?

The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 78% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 22% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

June 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

June 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood

June 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.