No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Altair RapidMiner vs SAP Predictive Analytics [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Altair RapidMiner
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Predictive Analytics (6th), Data Science Platforms (11th)
SAP Predictive Analytics [EOL]
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

SP
Solution Architect at Hitachi Digital Services
Visual workflows have empowered teams to build and deploy reliable predictive maintenance models
The best features Altair RapidMiner offers in my experience are the visual workflow designer in AI Studio, which is the foundation of everything. Building complete machine learning pipelines, data ingestion, transformation, feature engineering, model training, validation, and deployment in a drag-and-drop visual environment without extensive coding is what makes this accessible to organizations that cannot staff a team of Python developers for every analytics project. That capability opens the door.Auto Model is the feature I lean on most when doing rapid prototyping with clients. It evaluates multiple algorithms automatically, surfaces the best-performing model for the data, and explains why. That dramatically compresses the experimentation phase. What would take a data scientist days of manual testing, Auto Model does in an hour.
Gary Cook - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive at Empowered Analytics
Enables us to forecast and pull trends and has an easy installation
My rating for SAP Predictive Analytics would be an eight out of ten. If I have to be bold, I'll probably say that we're building away hours, and we are actually putting a lot of the actual predicting stuff back into the warehouse. So running it very bi-directionally. So I'm not sure what its integration features are at the moment, but that's an area we're going to look into in the next month or so.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The auto modeling has reduced end-of-line defect rates by approximately 18% in the first year after deploying the predictive quality models, translating directly into reduced scrap, lower rework costs, and better throughput."
"Since the beginning, we had a really nice onboarding experience with RapidMiner."
"One of the most valuable features is the built-in data tuning feature. Once the model is built, we often struggle to increase its accuracy, but RapidMiner allows us to fine-tune variables. For Example, when working on a project, we can adjust the number of nodes or the depth of trees to see how accuracy changes. This flexibility lets us achieve higher accuracy compared to traditional automated machine-learning models"
"The most valuable feature of RapidMiner is that it can read a large number of file formats including CSV, Excel, and in particular, SPSS."
"The tools have a complete function for doing data."
"RapidMiner is very easy to use."
"This solution is a great tool for users that are experimenting and is an alternative to doing the coding and everything themselves."
"The most valuable features are the Binary classification and Auto Model."
"I have found that the solution is very stable."
"The most valuable features are the analytics and reporting."
"SAP Predictive Analytics is better suited for business users because it hides the complexity of the model, whereas Microsoft Azure Machine Learning provides a lot more flexibility for technical professionals to tweak the model."
"I think the features of the actual ability to forecast and pull trends and correlations has been really good."
"We always purchase SAP support because it is very good."
 

Cons

"On the other hand, compared to some other products, maybe the UI could be enhanced."
"I would like to see all users have access to all of the deep learning models, and that they can be used easily."
"Regarding Altair RapidMiner's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security are not the greatest."
"The biggest problem, not from a platform process, but from an avoidance process, is when you work in a heavily regulated BFSI environment, like banking and finance."
"Improve the online data services."
"The visual interface could use something like the-drag-and-drop features which other products already support. Some additional features can make RapidMiner a better tool and maybe more competitive."
"One challenge I encountered while implementing RapidMiner was the lack of documentation. Since there aren't as many users, finding resources to learn the tool was initially difficult. To overcome this hurdle, I believe RapidMiner could improve by providing more tutorials tailored for new users."
"The product must provide data-cleaning features."
"The license fee appears to be prohibitively expensive and overly secretive, leading our clients to opt for cloud-based solutions that only charge for data storage and processing time."
"This solution works for acquired data but not live, real-time data."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I used an educational license for this solution, which is available free of charge."
"The client only has to pay the licensing costs. There are not any maintenance or hidden costs in addition to the license."
"Although we don't pay licensing fees because it is being used within the university, my understanding is that the cost is between $5,000 and $10,000 USD per year."
"For the university, the cost of the solution is free for the students and teachers."
"I'm not fully aware of RapidMiner's price because we had licenses provided, but from my analysis, it's moderately priced, not too high or too low. It's worth the investment."
"A free trial version is available for testing out this solution."
"The pricing is reasonable"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
9%
Educational Organization
9%
Outsourcing Company
18%
Construction Company
16%
Transportation Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise10
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for RapidMiner?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that the licensing model is based on Altair Units, which is their shared token-based system across their product portfolio and is flexibl...
What needs improvement with RapidMiner?
Altair RapidMiner can be improved by enhancing the newer GenAI features, which are interesting but honestly still quite early, and the documentation does not yet match the ambition of what they are...
What is your primary use case for RapidMiner?
My main use case for Altair RapidMiner is predictive quality analysis on the manufacturing site, as Wagner Spraytech manufactures spray finishing equipment and we generate a significant amount of o...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP BusinessObjects Predictive Analytics, BusinessObjects Predictive Analytics, BOPA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

PayPal, Deloitte, eBay, Cisco, Miele, Volkswagen
mBank
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Dataiku, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Data Science Platforms. Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.