No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Amazon Fraud Detector vs Riskified comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Fraud Detector
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
24th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Riskified
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Amazon Fraud Detector is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Riskified is 3.5%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Riskified3.5%
Amazon Fraud Detector1.5%
Other95.0%
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1461372 - PeerSpot reviewer
Graduate Analytics Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Quickly and reliably identifies potentially fraudulent activity
The problem I was facing, from a machine learning perspective, it only had a supervised learning capability. You would have to provide your data live, but in fraud, the pattern of the fraudsters keeps changing and it's impossible to provide data labels. That's where the user unsupervised learning comes in handy — you don't have to tell them, "okay, this is fraud and this is not fraud." If unsupervised learning was also incorporated with Amazon SageMaker, that would be really cool. I am talking about anomaly detection algorithms, like isolation, forest, or anything on the neural network side for anomaly detection, including autoencoders. These are some things which companies would really like to use. There was also a problem with latency. In fraud detection, everything needs to be happening in real-time, but some of the algorithms ran for three to four minutes, which is not a viable option.
JJ
Operations Manager at Wanderlust
Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful
The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function. I am satisfied with the documentation it provides. It integrates well with other products The user interface could be more intuitive. I have been familiar with Riskified for three years. Riskified is a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, we got some really good results; we got roughly a 77% recall, which meant 77% of the total fraud was actually picked up by Amazon Fraud Detector."
"Riskified's KPIs are probably the highest in the industry."
"I think that it is a great partnership if you are looking for reliable fraud prevention for your company."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"The scoring mechanism is good."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
 

Cons

"There was also a problem with latency. In fraud detection, everything needs to be happening in real-time, but some of the algorithms ran for three to four minutes, which is not a viable option."
"There was also a problem with latency. In fraud detection, everything needs to be happening in real-time, but some of the algorithms ran for three to four minutes, which is not a viable option."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"We didn't have the same consultants Riskified's side throughout the deployment, so we sometimes had to redefine the Business requests."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is determined by the requirements of each company."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Retailer
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

AWS Cloud9 IDE, Cloud9 IDE
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
ALDO, Macy's, Finish Line, Burlington, Burton Group, Sky-tours, GiftCards.com, Kirna Zabête
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, BioCatch and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: May 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.