Amazon MQ vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Red Hat is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.4% mindshare in MQ, compared to Red Hat’s 8.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 8 Amazon MQ reviews

737 Views
649 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Read 10 Red Hat AMQ reviews

1,982 Views
1,427 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Red Hat AMQ and Amazon MQ are competing products in the message queuing space. Amazon MQ seems to have the upper hand for businesses seeking cloud-native capabilities due to its seamless scalability and AWS integration.

Features: Red Hat AMQ offers flexible deployment options, high availability, and extensive protocol support which suits complex environments. Amazon MQ provides robust cloud-native capabilities, seamless integration with AWS, and easy scalability for organizations within the Amazon ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat AMQ could enhance cloud-specific features, simplify integration with non-Red Hat systems, and lower its learning curve for users unfamiliar with its ecosystem. Amazon MQ might improve hybrid deployment capabilities, enhance protocol support variety, and expand documentation for better user assistance in non-AWS environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat AMQ supports comprehensive deployment options suitable for hybrid and on-premises setups and offers notable customer service for complex implementations. Amazon MQ offers streamlined deployments within AWS for rapid rollouts with integrated AWS support, beneficial for businesses focused on cloud-based solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat AMQ may have higher costs due to licensing and on-premises setup, which might result in a slower ROI for smaller businesses but benefits large enterprises with tailored solutions. Amazon MQ's pay-as-you-go model offers pricing flexibility and often achieves higher short-term ROI, especially attractive for companies leveraging AWS services.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 4.4%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat AMQ is 8.4%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat AMQ	8.4%
Amazon MQ	4.4%
Other	87.2%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

RamilCerrada

Solution architect at SM Supermalls

Has provided consistent functionality across on-premise and cloud while simplifying cloud integration

I have experience with on-premise setups using ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ, but with regards to AWS, I use it via cloud only. There's a free tier with Amazon MQ based on their website, which is a six-month free trial of a single instance, allowing per month usage of either ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ, five gig of Amazon EFS storage, and for ActiveMQ, it's 20 gig of Amazon EBS storage for RabbitMQ. I did not purchase Amazon MQ through AWS Marketplace. Amazon MQ has published information about having 650 hours of free trial usage. This can be found via the AWS website by searching for AWS MQ. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Amazon MQ an eight out of ten.

Read full review

SachinJain

Senior Technical Specialist at Intuitive Technology Partners

Efficiently manages high availability and fault tolerance for critical systems with user-friendly management features

I have experience with features such as message persistence and fault tolerance because I configured high availability and fault tolerance for the client environment, including active-active and active-passive configurations. I mainly prefer active-active. I created a security feature for user authentication and authorization in Red Hat AMQ using vault. When you enable the vault, then your whole Red Hat AMQ becomes more secure. Management is straightforward. I configured it and created documentation. The operations team takes care of the operation part. I educate them on how to manage access, so they can easily add new people who join the company or manage the people who leave. The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring. On the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails. It also shows utilization in the tool. These features also come with other AMQs such as Amazon and IBM.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"Since we utilize AWS, it's easy to integrate Amazon MQ and work with other third-party software, as they have standard communications via API or native language."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

Cons

"Monitoring capabilities are not yet fully developed, since it's a message broker service, so it focuses more on the health of Apache."

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

"The product needs to improve its documentation and training."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"The solution is open-source."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

Amazon MQ needs to have data collected on performance to analyze trends for improvement. Additionally, some tools can suggest how to improve performance in terms of speed, time, and processing, whi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

I have some experience working with Amazon MQ.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The areas for improvement include cost, which is a primary concern. The deployment process is simple, but the cost is very important. Additionally, the management portal should be more user-friendl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

For use cases for Red Hat AMQ, let's take banking purposes. This depends upon the firm or the service or product company. For example, let's take HDFC Bank or any other bank. Whenever a customer de...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat AMQ?

I work primarily with Red Hat. For IBM, I have worked with their channel partner, not directly with IBM. For Amazon, I work with partners only. I am working with one company as a consultant. I also...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 26% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Amazon MQ

Compared 16% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Event Streams vs Amazon MQ

Compared 7% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 28% of the time

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 26% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 11% of the time

PubSub+ Platform vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

February 2026

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

March 2026

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ

March 2026

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.