Amazon MQ vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Red Hat is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.7% mindshare in MQ, compared to Red Hat’s 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Amazon MQ

Read 7 Amazon MQ reviews

917 Views
761 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Read 10 Red Hat AMQ reviews

2,553 Views
1,813 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon MQ

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Red Hat AMQ and Amazon MQ are competing products in the message queuing space. Amazon MQ seems to have the upper hand for businesses seeking cloud-native capabilities due to its seamless scalability and AWS integration.

Features: Red Hat AMQ offers flexible deployment options, high availability, and extensive protocol support which suits complex environments. Amazon MQ provides robust cloud-native capabilities, seamless integration with AWS, and easy scalability for organizations within the Amazon ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat AMQ could enhance cloud-specific features, simplify integration with non-Red Hat systems, and lower its learning curve for users unfamiliar with its ecosystem. Amazon MQ might improve hybrid deployment capabilities, enhance protocol support variety, and expand documentation for better user assistance in non-AWS environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat AMQ supports comprehensive deployment options suitable for hybrid and on-premises setups and offers notable customer service for complex implementations. Amazon MQ offers streamlined deployments within AWS for rapid rollouts with integrated AWS support, beneficial for businesses focused on cloud-based solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat AMQ may have higher costs due to licensing and on-premises setup, which might result in a slower ROI for smaller businesses but benefits large enterprises with tailored solutions. Amazon MQ's pay-as-you-go model offers pricing flexibility and often achieves higher short-term ROI, especially attractive for companies leveraging AWS services.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Amazon MQ is 3.7%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat AMQ is 9.4%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

AdnanKhan

Senior System Administrator at Ovrlod

Offers good web hosting capacity and security features, but price needs to be reduced

In terms of Amazon MQ's scalability and throughput capabilities, the tool is mostly accessible, stable, and competent with similar platforms. The tool's web hosting capacity and security features are good. The impact of the solution on process efficiencies depends on the clients. If the traffic is too high for a client, I suggest they go with Azure as it is more scalable and stable, while the support is good. I recommend Azure over Amazon MQ. Starting with Amazon MQ can be a bit tricky, but I know that the product is mature and the support is very good. The integration capabilities of Amazon MQ are flexible. I am not using AI with the tool. I would not recommend Amazon MQ to others. As a service provider, my company usually recommends cheaply priced and reliable solutions to our customers. Azure is one most reliable tool that comes at a good price point. Even Google Cloud is a super solution but for launching Google Cloud, support is not available, so one needs to do it with tutorials which are not completely available in YouTube. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Read full review

Sther Martins

Java Developer at SCCON

An easy-to-learn solution that can be used with microservices

We have done around 20 projects in Red Hat AMQ. I have two projects using Red Hat AMQ, and I can share how its scalability has impacted them. In one project, we have a solution for authentication and authorization using SSO. We need to integrate with other systems in two ways. We use Red Hat AMQ for social data, sending messages to other queues, and integrating with business. We have two databases with the same information. The solution is good because it helps us solve problems with messaging. For instance, when messaging doesn't change, we still check the cloud and verify the information. In another project, we have a large banking solution for the Amazon region using Red Hat AMQ for financial transactions. In this solution, business messages are sent, and another system processes them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon MQ is a secure solution."

"Amazon MQ is managed by AWS and is easy to use."

"Amazon MQ is important for being collaborative, allowing for centralized information."

"The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."

"We have found Amazon MQ to provide scalability, robustness, and security."

"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

"The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring; on the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails, and it also shows utilization in the tool."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

Cons

"In community support, especially with distributed systems and integration, there is a need for better system organization."

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great."

"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."

"The solution needs improvement in the back end and security."

"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."

"Amazon MQ isn't a cheap tool."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

"The product needs to improve its documentation and training."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."

"As a client or as an end user, I would say that Google Cloud Storage or Google Cloud are cheaper than Amazon MQ."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MQ?

The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon MQ?

The message queue requires an improvement in the message template MQ link. If Amazon provided a templating engine, it would be great.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon MQ?

We are using Amazon MQ for our AI model. It's used for notifications and other services. We have an application for which Amazon MQ acts as a broker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The areas for improvement include cost, which is a primary concern. The deployment process is simple, but the cost is very important. Additionally, the management portal should be more user-friendl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

For use cases for Red Hat AMQ, let's take banking purposes. This depends upon the firm or the service or product company. For example, let's take HDFC Bank or any other bank. Whenever a customer de...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat AMQ?

I work primarily with Red Hat. For IBM, I have worked with their channel partner, not directly with IBM. For Amazon, I work with partners only. I am working with one company as a consultant. I also...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon SQS vs Amazon MQ

Compared 34% of the time

IBM MQ vs Amazon MQ

Compared 26% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Amazon MQ

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service vs Amazon MQ

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Amazon MQ

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon MQ Competitors

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 36% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 27% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 2% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

July 2025

Download Amazon MQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

August 2025

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Overview

Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud. Message brokers allow different software systems–often using different programming languages, and on different platforms–to communicate and exchange information. Amazon MQ reduces your operational load by managing the provisioning, setup, and maintenance of ActiveMQ, a popular open-source message broker. Connecting your current applications to Amazon MQ is easy because it uses industry-standard APIs and protocols for messaging, including JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, MQTT, and WebSocket. Using standards means that in most cases, there’s no need to rewrite any messaging code when you migrate to AWS.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat

Sample Customers

SkipTheDishes, Malmberg, Dealer.com, Bench Accounting

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

Buyer's Guide

Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ

July 2025

Free Report: Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon MQ vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.