Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon MSK vs Instaclustr comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon MSK
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (6th)
Instaclustr
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Amazon MSK and Instaclustr aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Amazon MSK is designed for Streaming Analytics and holds a mindshare of 5.1%, down 8.4% compared to last year.
Instaclustr, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Master Data Management (MDM), holds 0.5% mindshare.
Streaming Analytics Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Amazon MSK5.1%
Apache Flink12.3%
Databricks10.0%
Other72.6%
Streaming Analytics
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Instaclustr0.5%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)21.6%
Reltio Cloud13.3%
Other64.6%
Cloud Master Data Management (MDM)
 

Featured Reviews

SYED SHAAZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Co-Founder & CTO at Photios AI
Improved data streaming and integration challenges prompt search for alternatives
The integration capabilities of Amazon MSK are not very flexible. If you have your own self-managed Kafka, that helps significantly because you can set up configurations. We are considering self-managed Kafka since our product is only one year old. The Kafka integrations are fine, but the configurations are an issue. The only issue with Amazon MSK that we are facing is the configurations. There are preset configurations and limited configurations that we can set for our unique use case. The product could improve by allowing us to set different configurations. I would also like to see Amazon MSK improve in the area of connectors. We are considering Confluent Cloud because they have many more connectors. They have KSQL DB and governance features. It is slightly costlier, but Confluent offers more flexibility with their connectors.
Use Instaclustr?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Construction Company
4%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon MSK?
Amazon MSK has significantly improved our organization by building seamless integration between systems.
What needs improvement with Amazon MSK?
The integration capabilities of Amazon MSK are not very flexible. If you have your own self-managed Kafka, that helps significantly because you can set up configurations. We are considering self-ma...
What is your primary use case for Amazon MSK?
We are recently working with Amazon MSK at Fortis, where we have multiple dashboards in our revenue intelligence platform. We are streaming data from different apps into those dashboards. The data ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: January 2026.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.