Amazon Neptune vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and MongoDB are both solutions in the Managed NoSQL Databases category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while MongoDB is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 7.2% mindshare in MND, compared to MongoDB’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Amazon Neptune

Read 4 Amazon Neptune reviews

769 Views
769 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB Atlas

Read 50 MongoDB Atlas reviews

4,863 Views
973 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Amazon Neptune

MongoDB Atlas

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

MongoDB Atlas and Amazon Neptune are cloud-based database solutions competing to meet varied user needs. MongoDB Atlas appears to have the upper hand due to its rich features and flexibility.

Features: MongoDB Atlas supports document, key-value, and ACID transactional data models and offers powerful horizontal scaling and global distribution. Amazon Neptune focuses on graph models, provides near-real-time querying, and supports graph APIs like Gremlin and SPARQL.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MongoDB Atlas is known for its easy deployment process and intuitive management tools. Amazon Neptune requires more intricate configurations, reflecting its specialized nature but delivers robust performance for graph queries. Both offer comprehensive support, with MongoDB Atlas often praised for ease of use during initial setup, whereas Neptune requires a deeper technical understanding, benefiting graph-focused applications.

Pricing and ROI: MongoDB Atlas offers a flexible pay-as-you-go pricing model, making it cost-effective for variable workloads and promising in scalability. Amazon Neptune usually incurs higher initial setup costs but justifies its pricing through specialized querying efficiency and data relationship management. MongoDB Atlas appeals financially for broad applications, while Neptune is valued for its specialized use cases.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Atlas Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Atlas

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Neptune

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB Atlas

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (3rd), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (8th), AI Software Development (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon Neptune is 7.2%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 12.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MongoDB Atlas	12.1%
Amazon Neptune	7.2%
Other	80.7%

Managed NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Reviewer3028812

Back End Developer at Zeta

Multiple graph models and languages support lead to efficient use, yet community growth brings challenges

The onboarding part and documentation where we could ideally use Amazon Neptune is excellent. Amazon Neptune as a product by AWS is exceptional because it supports multiple graph models such as RDF and property graph. It also has support for multiple querying languages such as Gremlin, SparkQL, and OpenCypher. It is very comprehensive in supporting every requirement we had at Zetta. Amazon Neptune's best features include its multiple servers, each supporting different languages such as OpenCypher, SparkQL, and RDF. For the same RDF graph or property graph, we could use multiple languages to query on different servers. This is exceptional because we have one graph DB with two endpoints exposed where we could interact with different languages on the same graph. Additionally, Amazon has a Sagemaker Jupyter Notebook which interacts with the Amazon Neptune database itself, providing a clean UI for representing nodes since the Jupyter Notebook has predefined graph representation capabilities through queries.

Read full review

Laksiri Bala

DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global

Room for improvement in data handling leads to enhanced cost-effective data management performance

It would be beneficial if MongoDB Atlas could better support OLTP aspects and data frames, as well as enhance its capabilities for data pipelines and visualization dashboards. Furthermore, supporting the medallion architecture could be a valuable addition, and incorporating improved spatial and vector handling for geographical data could make it more competitive. Enhancing vector processing for AI capabilities would also be critical.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Neptune as a product by AWS is exceptional because it supports multiple graph models such as RDF and property graph, and it also has support for multiple querying languages such as Gremlin, SparkQL, and OpenCypher, making it very comprehensive in supporting every requirement we had at Zetta."

"The initial setup is actually simple."

"Relational databases are never good at identifying patterns in graphs or other similar relationships, whereas Amazon Neptune is."

"I rate MongoDB Atlas a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is that it's all web-based. So one can browse collections just from the web. MongoDB Atlas is very accessible, quick to understand, and quick to learn. People who have never used CLI can hop into the web interface and browse the database."

"The cloud-based nature of this solution makes it flexible and scalable."

"The solution has a very intuitive user interface."

"The most valuable feature is the schemaless architecture."

"This solution is very helpful due to its ease of use."

"The speed of it is the most valuable feature."

"MongoDB Atlas is a database that is quite fast, stable, and reliable."

More MongoDB Atlas pros

Cons

"We had a strict time constraint, and it took many sleepless nights to find information in the documentation."

"Amazon Neptune could improve by spreading more awareness for others to have an understanding of the solution because the technology is fairly new. The developer community and larger community do not understand it yet."

"In my scenario, the integration wasn't easy because ................in Java."

"The speed when combining two documents is concerning."

"I would like to have better performance for user experience with the solution."

"MongoDB Atlas is effective for unstructured and semi-structured data, but when it comes to OLTP transactions, its performance declines."

"We had some edge cases where scalability was an issue where a node went offline, and we had to deal with that."

"There are some features that could be useful for the customers I work with, which are related to migration from on-prem to the cloud."

"We had some bad trainers when we first came onboard and would rate them fairly low. They did not seem staffed properly to fulfill the training services that they offered."

"From an improvement standpoint, MongoDB can improve security."

"The cost needs improvement."

More MongoDB Atlas cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS are on par for pricing and Google has been raising its prices."

"It is too expensive. They need to work on this."

"The pricing is not that expensive, but it can be, especially when we have deployed it across multiple zones."

"Comparing the price between the MongoDB and Microsoft SQL Server, we are using the enterprise edition of Microsoft SQL Server, which is more expensive than MongoDB."

"MongoDB Atlas is not expensive, and since it's a cloud-based solution, you pay by usage."

"Pricing could always be better."

"The pricing is good. We originally chose it over DynamoDB because of the pricing."

"We're currently using the Atlas for the night and don't require a license. However, it can be a problem if you want to use their enterprise environment. Then you need to purchase the license."

"MongoDB Atlas is more cost-effective than Amazon DocumentDB. It also has a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Apart from the standard licensing cost, you must also pay to get MongoDB Atlas technical support, which is expensive."

More MongoDB Atlas pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

12%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Neptune?

The cost aspects were managed by our SRE team who provisioned the instances. The pricing structure is similar to how EC2 instance pricing varies. I was informed that it was somewhat expensive, thou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Neptune?

The main issue was the limited community of Amazon Neptune users, which meant everything needed to be explored independently. Although this was adventurous, it required more time investment in the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Neptune?

We managed traffic at Zetta, and traffic would be moving between multiple services in our microservice architecture. Because of this setup, we were using Amazon Neptune to understand how many reque...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?

There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?

I have no idea about the pricing or setup cost with MongoDB Atlas.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?

I would say pricing is an area where MongoDB Atlas could improve.

See all answers

Comparisons

Neo4j AuraDB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 22% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon DocumentDB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon Timestream vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon Neptune Competitors

Amazon RDS vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 8% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 7% of the time

Google Cloud Firestore vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 6% of the time

More MongoDB Atlas Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Neptune

January 2026

Download Amazon Neptune product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Atlas

January 2026

Download MongoDB Atlas product report

Also Known As

No data available

Atlas, MongoDB Atlas (pay-as-you-go)

Overview

Amazon Neptune is a fast, reliable, fully managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected datasets. The core of Amazon Neptune is a purpose-built, high-performance graph database engine optimized for storing billions of relationships and querying the graph with milliseconds latency. Amazon Neptune supports popular graph models Property Graph and W3C's RDF, and their respective query languages Apache TinkerPop Gremlin and SPARQL, allowing you to easily build queries that efficiently navigate highly connected datasets. Neptune powers graph use cases such as recommendation engines, fraud detection, knowledge graphs, drug discovery, and network security.

Amazon Neptune is highly available, with read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across Availability Zones. Neptune is secure with support for HTTPS encrypted client connections and encryption at rest. Neptune is fully managed, so you no longer need to worry about database management tasks such as hardware provisioning, software patching, setup, configuration, or backups.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MongoDB Atlas stands out with its schemaless architecture, scalability, and user-friendly design. It simplifies data management with automatic scaling and seamless integration, providing dynamic solutions for diverse industries.

MongoDB Atlas offers a cloud-based platform valued for its seamless integration capabilities and high-performance data visualization. It features advanced security options such as encryption and role-based access control alongside flexible data storage and efficient indexing. Users benefit from its robust API support and the ability to manage the platform without an extensive setup process. Feedback suggests improvements are needed in usability, query performance, security options, and third-party tool compatibility. While pricing and support services could be more economical, there is a demand for enhanced real-time monitoring and comprehensive dashboards, as well as advanced containerization and scalability options supporting complex database structures.

What are the key features of MongoDB Atlas?

Schemaless Architecture: Flexible data storage without predefined structure.
Automatic Scaling: Dynamically adjusts resources to meet demand.
Advanced Security: Encryption and role-based access control.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplified management and operation.
Robust API Support: Facilitates integration with applications.

What benefits should you consider in a solution like MongoDB Atlas?

Cost-Effective Management: Minimizes setup and operational costs.
Dynamic Data Management: Adapts to varying business demands.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with other tools and frameworks.
High Performance: Optimized for real-time data processing and visualization.
Reliable Support: Accessible assistance and comprehensive documentation.

In healthcare and finance, MongoDB Atlas manages payment transactions and facilitates real-time analytics, powering SaaS solutions and storing large volumes of user data. It enhances scalability, performance, and security for cloud hosting, IoT integrations, and Node.js environments, widely favored for its flexibility and capability to support microservices.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

Intuit, Pearson, Samsung, Ignition One, Lifeomic, Blackfynn, Paysense

Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Atlas

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Atlas

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Atlas report.

See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.