Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
MongoDB Atlas Logo

Top 10 MongoDB Atlas Alternatives

Vendor: MongoDB
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
Start review

Top MongoDB Atlas Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to MongoDB Atlas based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Amazon RDS, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, and Microsoft Azure SQL Database. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

MongoDB Atlas surpasses its competitors by offering seamless scalability, automated cloud-based data management, and advanced security features that ensure high availability and data integrity, making it the ideal choice for businesses seeking robust database solutions.

MongoDB Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with MongoDB, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Amazon RDS
4.2 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Amazon RDS
4.2 out of 5
Amazon RDS is a reliable choice for structured applications with managed relational databases. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas offers flexible NoSQL solutions, facilitating scalability and dynamic data management. Each suits different needs depending on database structure and management requirements.
Download Amazon RDS vs. MongoDB Atlas Report
Amazon RDS offers competitive setup costs with straightforward implementation, while MongoDB Atlas provides a flexible and scalable setup, catering to varying project needs effectively.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon RDS offers competitive setup costs with straightforward implementation, while MongoDB Atlas provides a flexible and scalable setup, catering to varying project needs effectively.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers robust scalability and integration with Microsoft tools, appealing to enterprises seeking global distribution and ease within the Azure ecosystem. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas is favored for its affordability, intuitive design, and flexible deployment options, suitable for varied developer needs.
Download Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. MongoDB Atlas Report
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers competitive setup costs aimed at scalability and performance, while MongoDB Atlas provides a more straightforward initial setup, highlighting distinct approaches to pricing structures in cloud database solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers competitive setup costs aimed at scalability and performance, while MongoDB Atlas provides a more straightforward initial setup, highlighting distinct approaches to pricing structures in cloud database solutions.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Microsoft Azure SQL Database
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Azure SQL Database offers high reliability and robust security with seamless Azure integration. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas emphasizes schemaless flexibility and advanced auto-scaling features. SQL Azure provides strategic pricing and public cloud strength, while MongoDB Atlas features competitive pricing and flexible deployment options.
Download Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. MongoDB Atlas Report
Microsoft Azure SQL Database typically incurs lower setup costs, making it more accessible for small businesses, whereas MongoDB Atlas is known for its higher initial setup expense, appealing to enterprises seeking robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure SQL Database typically incurs lower setup costs, making it more accessible for small businesses, whereas MongoDB Atlas is known for its higher initial setup expense, appealing to enterprises seeking robust features.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Google Cloud SQL
4.1 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Google Cloud SQL
4.1 out of 5
Google Cloud SQL offers seamless integration with Google Cloud services, appealing to those prioritizing a unified ecosystem. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas provides flexibility and scalability for non-relational data, attracting users needing a versatile data model and adeptness with diverse data workloads.
Download Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas Report
Google Cloud SQL offers straightforward setup with variable pricing, while MongoDB Atlas requires no initial setup fees, allowing cost-effective scalability. Their distinct cost structures highlight differences in setup and scalability options for diverse user needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Cloud SQL offers straightforward setup with variable pricing, while MongoDB Atlas requires no initial setup fees, allowing cost-effective scalability. Their distinct cost structures highlight differences in setup and scalability options for diverse user needs.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Oracle Database as a Service
4.3 out of 5
Oracle Database as a Service offers high performance and security for applications requiring robust disaster recovery. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas provides flexible schema architecture, supporting rapid development with ease of use, ideal for businesses seeking NoSQL solutions and scalability in dynamic environments.
Download MongoDB Atlas vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report
Oracle Database as a Service often incurs higher setup costs, while MongoDB Atlas is generally known for lower initial expenses. This pricing difference highlights MongoDB's appeal for budget-conscious startups compared to Oracle's enterprise-level offerings.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Database as a Service often incurs higher setup costs, while MongoDB Atlas is generally known for lower initial expenses. This pricing difference highlights MongoDB's appeal for budget-conscious startups compared to Oracle's enterprise-level offerings.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Amazon DocumentDB
4.2 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Amazon DocumentDB
4.2 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas offers advanced features like end-to-end encryption and multi-cloud distribution, enhancing flexibility for developers. In comparison, Amazon DocumentDB, with its strong AWS integration and automatic scaling, provides reliability and scalability for enterprises relying on consistent AWS-based operations.
Download Amazon DocumentDB vs. MongoDB Atlas Report
MongoDB Atlas requires no initial setup cost, while Amazon DocumentDB may involve significant setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
MongoDB Atlas requires no initial setup cost, while Amazon DocumentDB may involve significant setup expenses.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Google Cloud Spanner
4.5 out of 5
Google Cloud Spanner appeals to those prioritizing consistency and scalability with strong integration into Google's ecosystem. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas attracts buyers with its flexible schema design and multi-cloud deployment options, emphasizing adaptable pricing and robust query features.
Download Google Cloud Spanner vs. MongoDB Atlas Report
Google Cloud Spanner involves a substantial setup cost, contrasting with MongoDB Atlas, which has more budget-friendly initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Cloud Spanner involves a substantial setup cost, contrasting with MongoDB Atlas, which has more budget-friendly initial expenses.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
4.0 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas excels in flexibility and scalability for NoSQL environments, supporting rapid deployment. In comparison, Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer provides advanced performance features for high-demand databases, requiring significant infrastructure. MongoDB Atlas is ideal for cost-effective, dynamic projects, while Oracle suits complex, resource-intensive applications.
Download MongoDB Atlas vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report
MongoDB Atlas offers a low initial setup cost, whereas Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer requires a substantially higher investment upfront, highlighting a significant difference in cost implications for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
MongoDB Atlas offers a low initial setup cost, whereas Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer requires a substantially higher investment upfront, highlighting a significant difference in cost implications for budget-conscious businesses.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Neo4j AuraDB
4.3 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Neo4j AuraDB
4.3 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas excels in scalability and flexibility, ideal for broad applications with a cost-effective pricing model. In comparison, Neo4j AuraDB provides superior graph algorithms and visualization tools, offering significant value for projects focused on complex, interconnected data structures.
Download MongoDB Atlas vs. Neo4j AuraDB Report
MongoDB Atlas features a straightforward setup with transparent pricing, while Neo4j AuraDB requires a more detailed initial configuration process.
View comparison
Pricing
MongoDB Atlas features a straightforward setup with transparent pricing, while Neo4j AuraDB requires a more detailed initial configuration process.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Yugabyte Platform
1 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas offers versatile NoSQL database management ideal for simplicity and smaller enterprises. In comparison, Yugabyte Platform provides advanced scalability and flexibility, benefiting complex large-scale projects. MongoDB's cost-effective model suits budget-conscious needs, while Yugabyte rewards extensive investment with operational advantages.
MongoDB Atlas often has higher setup costs compared to Yugabyte Platform, which offers a more budget-friendly option for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
MongoDB Atlas often has higher setup costs compared to Yugabyte Platform, which offers a more budget-friendly option for deployment.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Upstash
1 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Upstash
1 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas offers flexibility and scalability with advanced enterprise features. In comparison, Upstash emphasizes simplicity and cost-effectiveness, catering to serverless needs. MongoDB Atlas attracts businesses needing extensive capabilities, while Upstash suits developers seeking efficient, lightweight solutions. MongoDB Atlas and Upstash cater to different deployment priorities.
MongoDB Atlas requires an initial setup cost, while Upstash offers a cost-free setup, highlighting a clear cost-saving advantage for Upstash users.
View comparison
Pricing
MongoDB Atlas requires an initial setup cost, while Upstash offers a cost-free setup, highlighting a clear cost-saving advantage for Upstash users.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Imply
4.0 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas Logo
Imply
4.0 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas appeals to tech buyers seeking cloud database solutions with automated scaling and strong customer support. In comparison, Imply attracts businesses focusing on real-time analytics with its advanced data analysis capabilities, though it might require higher investment for its comprehensive features.
MongoDB Atlas typically has a higher setup cost, while Imply offers a more budget-friendly initial setup expense, highlighting a key difference for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
MongoDB Atlas typically has a higher setup cost, while Imply offers a more budget-friendly initial setup expense, highlighting a key difference for budget-conscious users.
MongoDB Atlas Logo
IBM Cloudant
1 out of 5
MongoDB Atlas Logo
IBM Cloudant
1 out of 5
IBM Cloudant offers cost-effective scalability and offline synchronization, ideal for constrained budgets. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas delivers automation and a flexible document model, appealing to those needing advanced features and robust security. Cloudant ensures rapid deployment, while MongoDB Atlas provides a powerful infrastructure.
IBM Cloudant has a minimal setup cost making it attractive for small businesses, while MongoDB Atlas requires a higher initial investment, which could be more suitable for larger enterprises needing extensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Cloudant has a minimal setup cost making it attractive for small businesses, while MongoDB Atlas requires a higher initial investment, which could be more suitable for larger enterprises needing extensive capabilities.

Related categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Managed NoSQL Databases
AWS Marketplace