No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

MongoDB Atlas vs SingleStore comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
MongoDB Atlas offers cost savings, enhances development efficiency, and improves application performance, crucial for large-scale distributed storage projects.
Sentiment score
7.5
SingleStore offers cost efficiency, versatility, and scalability, providing seamless setup and substantial ROI with minimal hassle and complexity.
We have seen a return on investment; while we do not have the exact numbers, as it is saving our time and making our development easier, we can easily say the cost is being reduced.
Senior Software Developer at NIT
I find it easy to use.
IT Manager at a government with 11-50 employees
The objective was to scale as data loads with high-performing query model responses.
Senior Software Engineer at Honeywell
I have seen a return on investment in terms of time saved.
Devops Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
MongoDB Atlas support is responsive but costly, with mixed feedback due to delays and reliance on documentation and community.
Sentiment score
7.8
SingleStore offers 24/7 support with a dedicated team, interactive UI, and personalized service, receiving high user satisfaction.
I have used them sometimes, even recently, and found the feedback to be spot on our needs.
Partner at Red software systems
The features of MongoDB Atlas fall short, resulting in an average rating due to higher-expectation features still lacking in its offerings.
DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global
Most of the issues I encountered, like query performance or indexing, were handled internally through monitoring, optimization, and best practices.
Senior Software Developer at NIT
The customer support is very proactive and responsive twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week.
Senior Software Engineer at Honeywell
Their team is capable of resolving issues efficiently, allowing users to create tickets and receive support.
Devops Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
MongoDB Atlas is highly scalable, adapting to changing demands, efficiently distributing data, and facilitating seamless expansion for applications.
Sentiment score
7.3
SingleStore scales efficiently with minimal downtime, offering seamless integration and optimal performance, ideal for organizations without budget constraints.
It's very much scalable, and I would rate scalability a nine.
General Manager at Kaleyra
It supports both vertical scaling and horizontal scaling through sharding, where data is distributed across multiple nodes.
Senior Software Developer at NIT
MongoDB Atlas offers sharding as a scalability feature, although it does not perform as well as Oracle.
DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global
SingleStore's scalability is high and it can be used by any size of organization and can handle any needs of any organization.
Senior Software Engineer at Honeywell
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Users commend MongoDB Atlas for stability and reliability, despite interface critiques and challenges with OLTP transactions and triggers.
Sentiment score
8.3
SingleStore is highly rated for stability, ensuring continuous operation despite errors, with strong redundancy and maintenance capabilities.
Since it is a managed service, features like replication, automatic failover, and backups are handled by the platform.
Senior Software Developer at NIT
When it comes to OLTP transactions, its performance declines.
DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global
The stability of the product is very high.
General Manager at Kaleyra
I have not seen any downtime.
Senior Software Engineer at Honeywell
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek MongoDB Atlas enhancements in data processes, integration, UI, performance, scalability, documentation, and cost efficiency.
SingleStore faces challenges in documentation, SQL features, integration, and support, with room for improvement in various areas.
Enhancing capabilities for data pipelines and visualization dashboards.
DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global
MongoDB Atlas should support containerization.
General Manager at Kaleyra
The UI is good, although I have checked one aspect in MongoDB Atlas: when we make transactions, they do not process in real-time and require a refresh.
Software Developer at Styx Global
Error handling needs attention. When it fails due to memory, it only indicates that but not exactly in which process it failed.
Senior Software Engineer at Honeywell
The data which is sent to DataDog sometimes does not match with the SingleStore dashboard.
Devops Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find MongoDB Atlas competitively priced, valuing its pay-as-you-go model, flexibility, and minimal initial setup expense.
SingleStore offers transparent pricing, with cost-effective enterprise licenses and free licensing for small self-managed installations.
For our service, it was around 300 to 600 euros per month, which was acceptable for our customers.
Partner at Red software systems
The price of MongoDB Atlas is reasonable, which is why many organizations, including mine, are opting for it.
DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it can be a bit expensive for startups.
Senior Software Engineer at Honeywell
 

Valuable Features

MongoDB Atlas excels in scalability, security, usability, and efficiency, effectively handling unstructured data and reducing operational costs.
SingleStore excels in speed, distributed architecture, and usability, offering fast data handling, MySQL support, and robust failover.
MongoDB Atlas is a fully managed service, meaning it handles deployment, scaling, backup, patching, and maintenance automatically, which allows developers to focus more on application logic instead of infrastructure.
Senior Software Developer at NIT
I find MongoDB Atlas highly scalable and easy to use, with very good support.
Partner at Red software systems
It is particularly useful for unstructured and semi-structured data because of its performance in these areas.
DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global
SingleStore has impacted my organization positively by enabling us to run low-latency analytics and model-driven use cases at scale, which is quite difficult for OLAP and OLTP databases alone.
Senior Software Engineer at Honeywell
The best features SingleStore offers in my experience are the excellent team support and the very good UI.
Devops Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

MongoDB Atlas
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Managed NoSQL Databases (3rd), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (3rd), AI Software Development (6th)
SingleStore
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Vector Databases (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 11.4%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SingleStore is 3.4%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service (DBaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
MongoDB Atlas11.4%
SingleStore3.4%
Other85.2%
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Varuns Ug - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Developer at NIT
Flexible document workflows have accelerated schema changes and simplified evolving data models
MongoDB Atlas currently has almost all the features we require, but there are some points where I see certain improvements. One area is cost visibility and optimization. Since pricing is largely based on storage and cluster size, it can sometimes be difficult to predict or optimize cost without deeper insights. More granular cost breakdowns or recommendations would be helpful. Another area I can mention is performance tuning transparency. While MongoDB Atlas provides monitoring and suggestions, debugging deeper issues like slow queries, index efficiency, or shard imbalance can sometimes require more control or visibility. Cost optimization, deeper performance insight, and easier scaling decisions would make MongoDB Atlas even more powerful. A couple of additional areas where MongoDB Atlas could improve are integrations and developer experience. For integrations, while MongoDB Atlas supports major cloud providers and tools, deeper and more seamless integration with observability patterns would make troubleshooting distributed systems easier. On the documentation side, while it is generally good, some advanced topics like sharding strategies, performance tuning, and real-world scaling patterns could benefit from more practical guidance. Additionally, a better local-to-cloud development experience, making it easier to replicate production-like MongoDB Atlas environments locally, would help developers test performance and scaling scenarios more efficiently.
Kelvin  Ben - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at Honeywell
Real-time analytics has transformed daily decisions and delivers fast dashboards from streaming data
The best features SingleStore offers include fast data recovery and data compression by 80 percent. Having the information in sheets helps me to process the information quickly. Simplicity in T-SQL is another aspect I appreciate. Data recovery and sheet-based processing help my team on a day-to-day basis by enabling us to handle information efficiently. I would like to add that the data compression by 80 percent helps us in an excellent way since we are very fast in obtaining the data for our dashboards and the compression of the information is great. SingleStore has impacted my organization positively by enabling us to run low-latency analytics and model-driven use cases at scale, which is quite difficult for OLAP and OLTP databases alone. It has been very helpful because our internal clients are happy to have the data and make data-driven decisions easily. Making decisions based on data within a two-hour delay to the transactional database is excellent since we went from twenty-four hours to two hours. I think the best contribution is decision-making with data that is close to reality. Reducing that delay from twenty-four hours to two hours has significantly affected my team and business outcomes by increasing productivity. We have been able to serve all our customers, and they are very happy. We can deliver to them on time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Outsourcing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?
There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?
Pricing-wise, MongoDB Atlas has a pay-as-you-go strategy. The documentation for MongoDB is very good; I have learned multiple things through reading it. The free tier is M0 for $0, which is suitabl...
What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?
MongoDB Atlas currently has almost all the features we require, but there are some points where I see certain improvements. One area is cost visibility and optimization. Since pricing is largely ba...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SingleStore DB?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it can be a bit expensive for startups, but for my organization, the cost is affordable and cost-effective.
What needs improvement with SingleStore DB?
I have noticed that SingleStore can be improved because the integration of SingleStore with DataDog is not good. The data which is sent to DataDog sometimes does not match with the SingleStore dash...
What is your primary use case for SingleStore DB?
My main use case for SingleStore is for our data retention and load management. We have infrastructure wherein the user's data are used for quick search, which means the searching functionality in ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Atlas, MongoDB Atlas (pay-as-you-go)
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.
400+ customers including: 6sense, Adobe, Akamai, Ant Money, Arcules, CARFAX, Cigna, Cisco, Comcast, DELL, DBS Bank, Dentsu, DirectlyApply, EY, Factors.AI, Fathom Analytics, FirstEnergy, GE, Goldman Sachs, Heap, Hulu, IMAX, impact.com, Kroger, LG, LiveRamp, Lumana, Nvidia, OpenDialog, Outreach, Palo Alto Networks, PicPay, RBC, Samsung, SegMetrics, Siemens, SiteImprove, SiriusXM, SK Telecom, SKAI, SONY, STC, SunRun, TATA, Thorn, ZoomInfo.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB Atlas vs. SingleStore and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.