Google Cloud SQL vs MongoDB Atlas comparison

Google and MongoDB are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Google is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while MongoDB is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Google holds a 16.2% mindshare in DS, compared to MongoDB’s 14.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud SQL

Read 22 Google Cloud SQL reviews

2,949 Views
2,698 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB Atlas

Read 49 MongoDB Atlas reviews

3,759 Views
2,307 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Google Cloud SQL

MongoDB Atlas

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Google Cloud SQL and MongoDB Atlas compete in the managed database services category. Google Cloud SQL has the upper hand in SQL database management, while MongoDB Atlas is better suited for NoSQL databases with flexible schema design.

Features: Google Cloud SQL offers automated backups, high availability, and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services. MongoDB Atlas includes rich querying capabilities, horizontal scaling, and global clusters.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud SQL needs better cost management tools and more comprehensive logging features. MongoDB Atlas can improve support responsiveness and documentation clarity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud SQL is known for its straightforward deployment process and robust customer service. MongoDB Atlas is easy to deploy but has slightly lower marks for customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud SQL is more affordable, especially for smaller projects, with good ROI through efficient resource management. MongoDB Atlas, while offering significant features, is seen as relatively more expensive.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud SQL

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB Atlas

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed NoSQL Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud SQL is 16.2%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Atlas is 14.2%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Prathap Sankar

Analytics Delivery Manager at Tredence Inc.

Gain control and flexibility with customizable tools but has slower performance

I am majorly working in Google Cloud SQL for building my applications Google Cloud SQL provides complete customization options, along with a dashboarding tool and a comprehensive suite of tools that can be used to customize and build any application needed. The deployment model allows for…

Read full review

Laksiri Bala

DB Architect / Consultant at Virtusa Global

Room for improvement in data handling leads to enhanced cost-effective data management performance

It would be beneficial if MongoDB Atlas could better support OLTP aspects and data frames, as well as enhance its capabilities for data pipelines and visualization dashboards. Furthermore, supporting the medallion architecture could be a valuable addition, and incorporating improved spatial and vector handling for geographical data could make it more competitive. Enhancing vector processing for AI capabilities would also be critical.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's SQL. SQL is so easy if you know something about databases. It's easy to learn."

"From a database management perspective, it provides services without the need for me to worry about backups, scaling, or other operational issues."

"Google Cloud SQL is highly scalable."

"This is a stable solution and offers good performance."

"The most valuable feature for us is the Postgres on Google Cloud SQL since it supports most of the features we need."

"My suggestion to anyone thinking about this solution is to jump into it head-first!"

"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use, simple, and user-friendly."

"Google Cloud SQL is easy to start with and allows me to scale as needed, which is advantageous from a developer perspective."

More Google Cloud SQL pros

"The key feature of MongoDB Atlas that has been helpful for us is the ease of deploying new databases."

"It is a scalable solution because we use quite a lot of data, and it handles it well."

"I find MongoDB Atlas highly scalable and easy to use, with very good support."

"You can start quickly on projects which allow you to store many things."

"This solution is very helpful due to its ease of use."

"MongoDB is a NoSQL tool."

"The speed of it is the most valuable feature."

"The auto-scaling feature is the most valuable aspect."

More MongoDB Atlas pros

Cons

"For data analysis, the AI area of the product has certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"It is hard to do logging with the solution."

"I would appreciate more flexibility with specific extensions applicable to engines like PostgreSQL. This would enhance the capabilities of Google Cloud SQL."

"The most vulnerable problem with Google SQL is that while you can customize your access control list, it provides you with a public IP address."

"The overall documentation and the connectors need improvement."

"To create a seamless data integration, the title integration of these databases with the data integration platforms is essential. This is what we would like to have in a future release."

"The performance compared to AWS is not as fast, and the technical support could be better as they don't have a dedicated team, but mostly AI handles the support now."

"I am yet to explore a lot of features that are present in this solution. However, it would be good if more documentation is available for this solution. This would help us in preparing for the certification exam and understand it better. Currently, we don't have much documentation. We do the labs for 20 or 25 minutes, but we can't capture and download anything."

More Google Cloud SQL cons

"I would like the solution to offer more integration capabilities since it is an area where the solution lacks."

"The UI is not currently designed in a manner to make it possible for a non-technical person or a layman to update the database easily."

"I am still new with it, but since I mentioned that I'm using this product for only the last six months and my experience with this product is good thus far, on a scale of one to ten, I would give MongoDB Atlas a six."

"Going forward, we would like to have pure AWS Cloud (native) storage instead regular storage on the AWS integration side."

"It would be great if it were easier to integrate MongoDB Atlas with AWS services. Technical support for MongoDB Atlas could be better."

"They could explore ways to facilitate deploying MongoDB containers within the platform."

"The cost needs improvement."

"Querying a dataset is not very intuitive, so I think that it can be improved."

More MongoDB Atlas cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."

"It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."

"The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."

"While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided."

"From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."

"You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."

"The solution is affordable."

"I have seen the cost, and it was pretty cheap."

"The price of MongoDB Atlas is highly expensive to use and maintain. They are taking advantage of the users with such a high price."

"The solution is fairly priced. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"I am using the free version of the solution."

"It is too expensive. They need to work on this."

"We're currently using the Atlas for the night and don't require a license. However, it can be a problem if you want to use their enterprise environment. Then you need to purchase the license."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise tier."

"The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace was very good."

More MongoDB Atlas pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Retailer

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud SQL?

The implementation part of the product was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud SQL?

The cost is expensive, especially for services like BigQuery, which charge based on query operations. We pay as we use, with no fixed cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud SQL?

Google Cloud SQL needs to improve its support for high-end I/O operations. On-prem systems with high I/O capabilities perform better, as Google Cloud SQL takes more time to handle the same tasks. T...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?

There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?

The price of MongoDB Atlas is reasonable, which is why many organizations, including mine, are opting for it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 39% of the time

Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 36% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 7% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud SQL Competitors

Amazon RDS vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 42% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 16% of the time

MongoDB vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 7% of the time

Upstash vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon DocumentDB vs MongoDB Atlas

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Atlas Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL

May 2025

Download Google Cloud SQL product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Atlas

May 2025

Download MongoDB Atlas product report

Also Known As

No data available

Atlas

Overview

Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.

Google

MongoDB Atlas offers a cloud-based database service known for speed, scalability, ease of use, and flexibility. Its robust features and advanced security measures support various business needs, making it ideal for unstructured data management.

MongoDB Atlas maximizes data handling capabilities by providing a seamless integration and high availability environment. The platform's schemaless architecture and rich query support make it suitable for complex data processing. With cloud-based infrastructure, deployment and maintenance are simplified, serving sectors such as healthcare, finance, and more. Organizations benefit from autoscaling, clustering, and APIs for effective project management. Continuous improvements in user experience, cost-effectiveness, query performance, and security are expected to meet evolving expectations.

What are the most important features?

Speed: Optimized for fast data handling and processing.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without hassle.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface for efficient navigation.
Flexibility: Supports unstructured data with ease.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with cloud environments.
High Availability: Ensures uninterrupted data access and operations.
Advanced Security: Protects data with robust security measures.
Schemaless Architecture: Enables dynamic data structure management.
Rich Query Support: Facilitates complex queries and analytics.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Easy Deployment: Streamlines the setup process in cloud environments.
Efficient Project Management: APIs and tools enhance workflow.
Cost-Effectiveness: Potential for more flexible pricing models.
Data Management: Automates backups and supports clustering.
Advanced Tools: Enables comprehensive data processing capabilities.

MongoDB Atlas is widely implemented in industries such as healthcare, finance, and technology. It serves applications requiring high availability and scalability, handling tasks from patient data management to real-time analytics. With its adaptable infrastructure, Atlas supports diverse use cases from IoT integration to transactional processing in cloud environments.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync

Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas

April 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud SQL vs. MongoDB Atlas report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.