Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud SQL vs Oracle Database as a Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud SQL
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Relational Databases Tools (19th), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (9th)
Oracle Database as a Service
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud SQL is 7.8%, down from 16.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database as a Service is 7.5%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service (DBaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Google Cloud SQL7.8%
Oracle Database as a Service7.5%
Other84.7%
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

VD
Database Engineer at Springer Nature
Migration to cloud eases management but needs better support for high I/O operations
Google Cloud SQL needs to improve its support for high-end I/O operations. On-prem systems with high I/O capabilities perform better, as Google Cloud SQL takes more time to handle the same tasks. There is also difficulty in changing the time zone after the database is set up. Moreover, some features available in MSSQL on-prem are missing on Google Cloud SQL, affecting migration potential.
reviewer1291212 - PeerSpot reviewer
Client CTO at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Provides high availability through replication but presents challenges with licensing complexity
The most recent vendor I am dealing with is HPE. I am not familiar with a product called Zella Security from CyberArk. I use Privileged Access Management. I work only with PAM. I deal with many vendors, and my latest vendor was CyberArk. For Google, I deal with hybrid cloud environments, both on-premises and cloud. I do the same for Microsoft as well. From Oracle, we do database management and purely focus on the database engines, and then the customer handles the schemas and the data management side of things. I don't have enough information on security in general to give a valued answer on whether I am happy with how secure the product is or if I sometimes see flaws. For Oracle, I think we have it under control. We have enough subject matter experts, so I would say it is okay to deploy Oracle Database as a Service. Usually, my clients have the solution on-premises or on the cloud as well. I would rate this review seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The implementation part of the product was easy."
"The valuable feature of Google Cloud SQL is its high availability option. The product is stable."
"Google Cloud SQL is very easy to use and easy to set up; it brings the benefits of being simple to perform queries, store data that I needed to store, and extract data when I needed to extract it quite quickly, without having to set up a full database and queries around it."
"My suggestion to anyone thinking about this solution is to jump into it head-first!"
"It is not the cool features that I find valuable, it is the stability of Google Cloud Platform."
"Google Cloud SQL is easy to start with and allows me to scale as needed, which is advantageous from a developer perspective."
"What I like the most about Google Cloud SQL is that it handles the management, which allows us to concentrate on our applications."
"From a database management perspective, it provides services without the need for me to worry about backups, scaling, or other operational issues."
"The customer service for this solution is very good. I would rate them a nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is the integration into other Oracle applications."
"The initial setup is not too difficult, and on a scale from one to ten with one being the most difficult and ten being the easiest, I'd rate it at eight. The initial deployment can be done in an hour."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its security, performance, and availability."
"Oracle Database as a Service's most valuable feature is its financial applications."
"The solution is stable."
"I like the solution's performance and ease of development."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Database as a Service are configuration and troubleshooting."
 

Cons

"Google's technical support is good, but they tend to never reopen a case and to send us snippets from the publicly available documentation. It's not as helpful as you would expect, not just for Google Cloud SQL but for all of Google Cloud products."
"The most challenging part is dealing with legacy data from your old systems and migrating it into the new setup, but once you've completed the data migration, it becomes quite convenient to use."
"The monitoring part could be better."
"For data analysis, the AI area of the product has certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"I would appreciate more flexibility with specific extensions applicable to engines like PostgreSQL."
"Google Cloud SQL needs to improve its support for high-end I/O operations. On-prem systems with high I/O capabilities perform better, as Google Cloud SQL takes more time to handle the same tasks."
"They could improve documentation and dashboard stability for efficient user experience and database management."
"The product's user interface could be more user-friendly to improve the overall user experience."
"The solution's pricing could be less expensive."
"The support provides help based on the same size fits all kinds of approaches, making it an area where improvements are needed."
"The solution provides the same type of RDBMS engine for all use cases. They need to provide different products that will be suitable for all use cases. The solution does not support the documentation of databases."
"In the next release, I would like to see a framework for memory management."
"The tool needs to improve its pricing and stability."
"When migrating to a different instance, the internal machine learning is lost."
"The solution’s price could be reduced."
"The interface can be difficult and there may be so many features that users and even vendors are unaware that they exist."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is affordable."
"From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."
"While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided."
"You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."
"It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."
"The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."
"It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."
"The solution is expensive."
"It is a very expensive tool."
"This solution is costly because it saves a lot of data."
"The price of Oracle Database as a Service is expensive."
"What has been done is that an annual subscription model has been launched, which includes the payment of both the AML (Annual Maintenance Fee) and the subscription fee, paid on a yearly basis."
"Customers need to pay extra costs for the solution based on their scope and business."
"The price of the solution depends on the scale of how you will use it."
"The pricing may seem expensive, but the value corresponds to the quality of the product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Educational Organization
9%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Retailer
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise32
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud SQL?
The implementation part of the product was easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud SQL?
We have set up automated patch management for Google Cloud SQL, and it does on a daily basis what needs to be done, so it is pretty good overall for maintaining our database security.
What needs improvement with Google Cloud SQL?
Sometimes the sharing with third parties or configuring that in Google Cloud SQL is not the most intuitive. From a user perspective, if Google Cloud SQL integrated AI directly into the query so tha...
What do you like most about Oracle Database as a Service?
It has significantly enhanced our application development process by introducing substantial time savings and streamlining routine tasks.
What needs improvement with Oracle Database as a Service?
I see some negative sides that could be improved, and that is the licensing. The issue with licensing is the price and the way they license through partners.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle DBaaS, Oracle Database Cloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync
Solution-Soft, DX Marketing, Suredell and Partners, Frontiers, SettleOurEstate.com, Demand Analysis Ltd, endlich IT & Projekt Service OHG
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud SQL vs. Oracle Database as a Service and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.