Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Google is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 19.1% mindshare in DS, compared to Google’s 10.7% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 57 Amazon RDS reviews

3,520 Views
3,485 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Google Cloud SQL

Read 22 Google Cloud SQL reviews

2,081 Views
2,081 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

Google Cloud SQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL both compete in the cloud database services category. Amazon RDS seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive database services and ease of integration with CI/CD tools, while Google Cloud SQL is chosen for flexibility and performance insights.

Features: Amazon RDS includes automated management, multi-database support, and seamless integration with CI/CD tools. Its Multi-AZ feature enhances high availability, coupled with strong backup and snapshot capabilities. Google Cloud SQL offers ease of management, robust security features, and supports databases like Postgres and MySQL. Its strong integration with other Google services increases its functionality.

Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS could enhance migration support, improve integration with non-Amazon services, and allow more advanced administrative control. Google Cloud SQL could expand its support for third-party tool integration, enhance its support documentation, and address the high costs associated with its services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is noted for its easy deployment across cloud environments, though its technical support can be costly depending on service levels. Google Cloud SQL offers similar deployment versatility and quick support response, but initial interactions can lack depth. Both services can improve their global presence and support efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS is considered cost-effective with its pay-as-you-go model, but unexpected costs can challenge users. Google Cloud SQL's pricing, while higher, is justified by its robust features and low management overhead, providing competitive ROI when used effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud SQL

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 19.1%, down from 25.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud SQL is 10.7%, down from 17.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon RDS	19.1%
Google Cloud SQL	10.7%
Other	70.2%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Samuel Ebite

AICE Graduate at alx_africa

Ensure high availability with robust encryption and seamless backups

Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS. The best practices we've employed with RDS help design a well-architected framework, encompassing security, encryption, scalability with multi-availability zone deployment, and operational excellence with automated backups. RDS features, such as reserved instances, storage auto-scaling, monitoring with technologies like CloudWatch, and proxies, contribute to cost optimization. The solution enhances security with IAM authentication and offers high availability to end users.

Read full review

Prathap Sankar

Analytics Delivery Manager at Tredence Inc.

Gain control and flexibility with customizable tools but has slower performance

I am majorly working in Google Cloud SQL for building my applications Google Cloud SQL provides complete customization options, along with a dashboarding tool and a comprehensive suite of tools that can be used to customize and build any application needed. The deployment model allows for…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest advantage of Amazon RDS, which is basically an AWS service, is that you can customize it."

"The product is very, very easy to use."

"I recommend RDS because it makes your life super easy."

"Amazon RDS is lightweight and flexible."

"The product's most valuable features are option groups, S3 integration, automated and scheduled snapshots, and cross-region replication."

"It is easy to use, flexible, and powerful."

"The solution has unique features like backup and recovery, and snapshots. It upgrades automatically. The solution offers easy analytics concerning performance metrics. Its reliability and scalability are very good. The tool's most valuable features are disaster recovery, high availability and scalability."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon RDS is its performance."

More Amazon RDS pros

"Its most valuable feature is that it's scalable. I can start off with a base of a lot of data and move as much as I want and it's the same as if asked to do a lot of infrastructure changes."

"Google Cloud SQL is easy to start with and allows me to scale as needed, which is advantageous from a developer perspective."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"What I like the most about Google Cloud SQL is that it handles the management, which allows us to concentrate on our applications."

"Google Cloud SQL enhances our AI-driven projects by providing features like query optimization and scalability for efficiently processing large datasets."

"The deployment model allows for significant control and flexibility."

"From a database management perspective, it provides services without the need for me to worry about backups, scaling, or other operational issues."

"My suggestion to anyone thinking about this solution is to jump into it head-first!"

More Google Cloud SQL pros

Cons

"The product must add more older versions of the database engines."

"They could provide better integration for the solution with Microsoft products."

"They should add a feature for manual SQL patching in RDS."

"In the next release, it would be great to see RDS provide connection pooling out of the box."

"I like using Amazon RDS because it offers quick operations for me. However, there are times when understanding how to use some of the services can be challenging, even with documentation. If I could add a feature, I'd improve navigation for related services."

"Amazon cannot guarantee the stability of some extensions, and there is a need for different extensions to meet PCI requirements."

"The Performance Monitor they have is a little clanky, at least in regards to the UI."

"With my limited experience, I have noticed that documentation management could be improved. It could be better."

More Amazon RDS cons

"The only thing that could be better is the pricing."

"They could improve documentation and dashboard stability for efficient user experience and database management."

"I would like to see better availability of the product in different regions. It should also improve the security with encryption."

"The most vulnerable problem with Google SQL is that while you can customize your access control list, it provides you with a public IP address."

"The product's user interface could be more user-friendly to improve the overall user experience."

"I would like to see better integration with all the different tools on the platform."

"The most challenging part is dealing with legacy data from your old systems and migrating it into the new setup, but once you've completed the data migration, it becomes quite convenient to use."

"I would appreciate more flexibility with specific extensions applicable to engines like PostgreSQL. This would enhance the capabilities of Google Cloud SQL."

More Google Cloud SQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."

"Amazon RDS is less expensive than other solutions."

"The product is expensive."

"The cost is manageable because you can see the expense associated with each instance and utilize tools for tagging and cost control."

"The solution is fairly priced."

"The solution is expensive."

"Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."

"It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."

"The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."

"While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided."

"The solution is affordable."

"You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."

"From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

The pricing for Amazon RDS is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

I don't really see any disadvantages of Amazon RDS. With Oracle, I think AWS doesn't provide the RAC stability. If you have Oracle installed in your own data centers, you can set up various cluster...

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud SQL?

The implementation part of the product was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud SQL?

The cost is expensive, especially for services like BigQuery, which charge based on query operations. We pay as we use, with no fixed cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud SQL?

Google Cloud SQL needs to improve its support for high-end I/O operations. On-prem systems with high I/O capabilities perform better, as Google Cloud SQL takes more time to handle the same tasks. T...

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 13% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon RDS

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Amazon RDS

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 34% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 6% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Db2 on Cloud vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Cloud SQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

September 2025

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL

September 2025

Download Google Cloud SQL product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQL and MySQL databases in the cloud. Google Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQL provides a database infrastructure for applications running anywhere.

Google

Sample Customers

Edmodo

BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

September 2025

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.