Amazon RDS vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 12.6% mindshare in DS, compared to Oracle’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 58 Amazon RDS reviews

4,001 Views
3,801 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Read 7 Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer reviews

1,044 Views
1,044 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Amazon RDS and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer compete in the cloud database solutions category. Amazon RDS seems to have the upper hand in deployment ease and pricing, while Oracle Exadata stands out with its advanced features and performance.

Features: Amazon RDS provides automation, scalability, and straightforward integration with other AWS services, which users find highly valuable. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer offers advanced database capabilities, superior performance, and comprehensive security features. Users who require extensive database functionalities and high performance lean towards Oracle Exadata.

Room for Improvement: Users of Amazon RDS highlight the need for better performance for complex queries and more extensive support for non-relational databases. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer users seek improvements in usability and wish for an easier initial setup process. Both products have room for optimization, but the focus areas differ, with Amazon RDS needing performance enhancements and Oracle aiming to simplify its setup and usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is praised for its simple deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, while more complex to deploy, is highly regarded for its dedicated customer support. Users find Amazon’s deployment swift and hassle-free, whereas Oracle’s product requires a more involved setup but comes with excellent support.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS is cost-effective, appealing to businesses looking for affordable database solutions. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer offers higher setup costs but delivers substantial ROI for enterprises demanding top-tier database performance and features. Pricing efficiency is a selling point for Amazon RDS, while Oracle’s high investment is justified by its advanced capabilities and performance yields.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (9th)

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 12.6%, down from 25.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is 3.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon RDS	12.6%
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer	3.9%
Other	83.5%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2592669

Director Software Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Positive experiences with database services, with minor room for feature enhancements observed

I don't really see any disadvantages of Amazon RDS. With Oracle, I think AWS doesn't provide the RAC stability. If you have Oracle installed in your own data centers, you can set up various clusters and we can set up the RACs, but in Amazon RDS, we cannot have the RAC feature of Oracle. They could add that feature. Amazon RDS has limitations regarding RAC. If we talk about installing Oracle in RDS, we cannot have the RAC, but if you deploy Oracle on GCP, then there is probably the RAC feature available. I observed that around two or three years back, but I'm not sure whether they have added the RAC feature in AWS. Amazon RDS is expensive compared to GCP. GCP also has the same features, and although it is quite extensive and feature-rich, I see Amazon RDS as slightly expensive compared to other clouds.

Read full review

WALID BOUHAJJA

Oracle DBS at Bpifrance

Positive experience with virtual cloud network creation and database migration highlights patching challenges

The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs. We have many features, including the observability feature that helps check performance and generates numerous reports about performance. We have also implemented APIs, enabling us to create and perform many operations. This means we need DBAs who can work with APIs. We are autonomous in the patching process and don't need Oracle for patching. If you configure the process of patching, it will be executed automatically. We are using dynamic scaling which is implemented on an external virtual machine, helping us to downscale or upscale the CPU. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer has supported our organization's compliance and data sovereignty without problems. I have observed some limitations. For example, regarding encryption, though it is mandatory for Exadata Cloud at Customer, we cannot encrypt the database with external keys. Currently, with Exadata Cloud at Customer, using external keys is not possible.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon RDS is easy to manage, and it has customizable performance, high availability, and duality."

"The product's most valuable features are option groups, S3 integration, automated and scheduled snapshots, and cross-region replication."

"The solution has unique features like backup and recovery, and snapshots. It upgrades automatically. The solution offers easy analytics concerning performance metrics. Its reliability and scalability are very good. The tool's most valuable features are disaster recovery, high availability and scalability."

"The impact of Amazon RDS scalability and backup has been positive, with good vertical scaling, scale up and down, horizontal scaling, and storage scaling."

"The product's initial setup phase is totally easy."

"The solution is good for on-premise deployments."

"It is stable, scalable, and easy to deploy."

"I use Amazon RDS to store and manage data securely. It helps me retrieve information and gain insights from the data that comes in for my business or specific applications."

More Amazon RDS pros

"I am particularly fond of the intelligent capabilities that enhance the backend, utilizing technology to analyze SQL queries."

"The operation model is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is that it is based on Exadata infrastructure, which is Oracle 's leading engineered system that is trusted, fault-tolerant, and has unique performance features."

"The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs, with observability features to check performance, generate reports, and implement APIs for creating and performing many operations."

"Performance has significantly improved."

"I like that Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is a stable, well-positioned product in the market today, and it's very scalable."

"Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime."

Cons

"Currently, speaking of Microsoft SQL on RDS, you don't have a full option to be able to use it directly on RDS. So, it needs improvement."

"The setup might be a bit challenging for multi-level applications."

"In the next release, it would be great to have access to core parameters to improve or tweak the performance."

"AWS support is decent, but it's not as good as before. Sometimes, we get junior staff who are unable to answer our questions. It also depends on the support team you get. Support based in Europe and Australia is better than US support. For example, European support is quick to deliver the right answer. US support handles routine maintenance issues, and it's mostly junior staff who don't know the product well."

"The Performance Monitor they have is a little clanky, at least in regards to the UI."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"The solution could improve by adding a sandbox environment and more security."

"The technical support from Amazon could improve. I would rate them a six out of ten as they do not fully meet my expectations."

More Amazon RDS cons

"For the data migration, we used ZDM. It was not integrated with the databases, and the documentation lacks clarity."

"The solution is expensive."

"As a customer, you can't see the boot messages of your virtualized guest machines."

"Scalability is not straightforward."

"We had some problems in the developer's environment. We had some problems with the initial installation environment."

"A room for improvement in Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that they need to train more partners to gain more knowledge because currently, they are keeping a lot to themselves. For example, they are still keeping a lot of information on their campus, so information sharing is limited."

"Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is stable, but the only problem occurs during OS patching. If you encounter issues, the VMC (virtual machine cluster) becomes unusable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"By using a combination of Reserve Instances and On-Demand pricing, you can reduce the cost."

"The price of Amazon RDS is expensive."

"The cost is manageable because you can see the expense associated with each instance and utilize tools for tagging and cost control."

"Amazon RDS is cheaper compared to other tools."

"Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."

"The solution is fairly priced."

"Amazon RDS is less expensive than other solutions."

"It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"The price is too much."

"The machine and the cloud model itself already have licensing advantages."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

32%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

The pricing for Amazon RDS is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

Currently, I cannot think of any major improvements. Perhaps more platforms in terms of database engine versions would be beneficial. Right now, Amazon RDS supports MySQL and PostgreSQL, but there ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

The pricing is reasonable due to a universal agreement, which often positions Oracle solutions better against others. I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

In future updates for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, I would like to see another feature for the different costs for the non-CDB models, because if you are not using the non-CDB models, you have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

The use cases for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer are based on our actual solution. We have the Exadata, but it has reached its end of life. The X5 has attained the end of life, so we discussed mi...

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 17% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 15% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

March 2026

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

March 2026

Download Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle Cloud@Customer brings Oracle’s complete portfolio of public cloud infrastructure, fully managed cloud services, and Oracle Fusion SaaS applications into your data center. It enables you to run applications faster and lower your costs using the same high-performance capabilities, autonomous operations, and low-cost subscription pricing in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). You get all this while maintaining complete control of your data so you can address data residency, security, and connectivity concerns.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Edmodo

IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish Water, trueblue, AirAsia, droptank

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

March 2026

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.