Amazon RDS vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #12 with an average rating of 6.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 11.7% mindshare in DS, compared to Oracle’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 58 Amazon RDS reviews

6,367 Views
5,730 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Read 7 Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer reviews

1,399 Views
1,385 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Amazon RDS and Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer compete in the managed database services category. Amazon RDS seems to have an advantage in ease of use and flexibility, while Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer stands out in performance and compliance for high-demand environments.

Features: Amazon RDS is praised for ease of use, flexibility, and managed services, including automated backups, scalability, and high availability. It supports diverse database engines and offers strong security features like multi-availability zone deployment. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer features robust performance with autonomous patching and dynamic scaling, appealing to organizations with strict compliance and data sovereignty requirements.

Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS could improve first-time configuration and user interfaces, enhancing cost management and integration with Microsoft technologies. Super-user limitations affect advanced configurations. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer needs better partner training and public documentation for data migration, with room for improvement in scalability flexibility compared to competitors.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is noted for easy setup in public cloud environments, though costlier technical support is crucial for complex issues. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer supports both on-premises and cloud deployments. Users suggest better software support documentation and more trained partners for ease in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS uses a usage-based pricing model with Reserve Instances and BYOL. Users note its complexity and high costs, though it offers good ROI by reducing DBA needs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer has a capacity-based pricing model with high initial costs but provides significant ROI in demanding environments due to performance and licensing benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (8th)

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 11.7%, down from 24.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is 3.5%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon RDS	11.7%
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer	3.5%
Other	84.8%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2592669

Director Software Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Positive experiences with database services, with minor room for feature enhancements observed

I don't really see any disadvantages of Amazon RDS. With Oracle, I think AWS doesn't provide the RAC stability. If you have Oracle installed in your own data centers, you can set up various clusters and we can set up the RACs, but in Amazon RDS, we cannot have the RAC feature of Oracle. They could add that feature. Amazon RDS has limitations regarding RAC. If we talk about installing Oracle in RDS, we cannot have the RAC, but if you deploy Oracle on GCP, then there is probably the RAC feature available. I observed that around two or three years back, but I'm not sure whether they have added the RAC feature in AWS. Amazon RDS is expensive compared to GCP. GCP also has the same features, and although it is quite extensive and feature-rich, I see Amazon RDS as slightly expensive compared to other clouds.

Read full review

WALID BOUHAJJA

Oracle DBS at Bpifrance

Positive experience with virtual cloud network creation and database migration highlights patching challenges

The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs. We have many features, including the observability feature that helps check performance and generates numerous reports about performance. We have also implemented APIs, enabling us to create and perform many operations. This means we need DBAs who can work with APIs. We are autonomous in the patching process and don't need Oracle for patching. If you configure the process of patching, it will be executed automatically. We are using dynamic scaling which is implemented on an external virtual machine, helping us to downscale or upscale the CPU. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer has supported our organization's compliance and data sovereignty without problems. I have observed some limitations. For example, regarding encryption, though it is mandatory for Exadata Cloud at Customer, we cannot encrypt the database with external keys. Currently, with Exadata Cloud at Customer, using external keys is not possible.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Amazon RDS features I found most valuable are snapshots and automatic backups."

"Aurora, the RDS product, is excellent."

"I recommend RDS because it makes your life super easy."

"It is very easy to set up initially."

"With RDS, everything is turnkey and always available."

"The solution's customer service is excellent."

"Amazon RDS is quite a well-managed and stable service...The initial setup was very easy."

"Amazon RDS makes it easier for me to manage databases compared to traditional databases like MongoDB or local host servers."

More Amazon RDS pros

"The most valuable feature is that it is based on Exadata infrastructure, which is Oracle 's leading engineered system that is trusted, fault-tolerant, and has unique performance features."

"We have migrated mission-critical databases to Exadata and gained significant performance in our OLTP and Batch jobs."

"Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime."

"I am particularly fond of the intelligent capabilities that enhance the backend, utilizing technology to analyze SQL queries."

"Performance has significantly improved."

"I like that Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is a stable, well-positioned product in the market today, and it's very scalable."

"The operation model is the most valuable feature."

"The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs, with observability features to check performance, generate reports, and implement APIs for creating and performing many operations."

Cons

"I also don't think it's very scalable."

"The technical support from Amazon could improve. I would rate them a six out of ten as they do not fully meet my expectations."

"The setup might be a bit challenging for multi-level applications."

"With my limited experience, I have noticed that documentation management could be improved. It could be better."

"In the next release, it would be great to have access to core parameters to improve or tweak the performance."

"One notable improvement that could enhance the database management experience, particularly during migration scenarios, is the accessibility of the root user."

"Need to have in depth understanding of cost, else we are in position to pay more, which makes us think our own DB is better when cost is very huge amount."

"It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with Microsoft products. Our clients use the Microsoft Tally application server. We already tried to create a reputation from, for example, an on-premises environment from our client to Amazon RDS using Microsoft Tally server, and we couldn't do that because we didn't have a strong user in RDS. We couldn't create a reputation from an on-premises environment from the Microsoft Tally server to RDS. I think that it would be a good implementation, and it would help us with this case."

More Amazon RDS cons

"We had some problems in the developer's environment. We had some problems with the initial installation environment."

"As a customer, you can't see the boot messages of your virtualized guest machines."

"Scalability is not straightforward."

"Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is stable, but the only problem occurs during OS patching. If you encounter issues, the VMC (virtual machine cluster) becomes unusable."

"For the data migration, we used ZDM. It was not integrated with the databases, and the documentation lacks clarity."

"Today their support no longer lives up to my expectation."

"The solution is expensive."

"A room for improvement in Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that they need to train more partners to gain more knowledge because currently, they are keeping a lot to themselves. For example, they are still keeping a lot of information on their campus, so information sharing is limited."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are paying for a service license."

"It is less expensive than SQL Server. We pay based on the usage on a monthly basis."

"The pricing of RDS is a little bit high compared to Microsoft... However, it is a good price compared to other solutions."

"Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."

"The price could be better."

"The substantial initial credit and cost-effectiveness make Amazon an attractive option."

"The cost depends on the kind of instance we use."

"The solution is fairly priced."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"The price is too much."

"The machine and the cloud model itself already have licensing advantages."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

University

Financial Services Firm

34%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	24

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

The pricing for Amazon RDS is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

Currently, I cannot think of any major improvements. Perhaps more platforms in terms of database engine versions would be beneficial. Right now, Amazon RDS supports MySQL and PostgreSQL, but there ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon RDS?

I am a Solutions Architect, so I design solutions for our clients. Prior to this role, I was an implementation engineer, so I also implement solutions for our customers.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

The pricing is reasonable due to a universal agreement, which often positions Oracle solutions better against others. I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

In future updates for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, I would like to see another feature for the different costs for the non-CDB models, because if you are not using the non-CDB models, you have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

The use cases for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer are based on our actual solution. We have the Exadata, but it has reached its end of life. The X5 has attained the end of life, so we discussed mi...

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 14% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 12% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 10% of the time

More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

June 2026

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

June 2026

Download Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Overview

Amazon RDS offers scalability, high availability, and security. It supports multiple database engines and facilitates automated backups and data encryption, with a focus on user-friendly features.

Amazon RDS is a managed database service supporting engines like MySQL and PostgreSQL. It enhances resilience through Multi-AZ deployments and integrates with tools like CloudWatch for monitoring and cost management. Users appreciate its ease of use, performance insights, and the reduction in administrative tasks which enable them to concentrate on business objectives. However, some users find interface complexity and administrative privilege needs challenging, along with migration difficulties.

What are the key features of Amazon RDS?

Scalability: Supports storage and read replicas to handle growing data needs.
High Availability: Multi-AZ deployments ensure database resilience.
Security: Features such as data encryption and automated backups protect data.

What benefits should users expect?

Streamlined Administration: Reduces time spent on database management.
Improved Performance: Access to performance insights for optimization.
Cost Efficiency: Monitoring tools help manage and reduce costs.

In industries like web development, fintech, and e-commerce, Amazon RDS is utilized to optimize database handling, ensure high availability, and facilitate secure data transactions. Organizations often use AWS migration tools to transition from on-premises infrastructures to cloud environments, benefiting from managed services to focus on enhancement rather than maintenance.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer optimizes backend performance and SQL query analysis. It offers scalable and observable infrastructure, ensuring reliable virtualization and licensing solutions tailored for on-premises management.

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer bridges the gap between cloud capabilities and on-premises control, providing enhanced performance, security, and cost efficiency for managing critical data. Users enjoy Oracle-managed virtualization and support services while maintaining data sovereignty and compliance. Despite needing improvements in scalability and documentation, it remains a preferred choice for large databases requiring robust infrastructure.

What are the key features of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

Enhanced Performance: Optimizes SQL query analysis and backend capabilities.
Scalability & Observability: Dynamic scaling with extensive management tools.
Autonomous Patching: Simplifies maintenance with automated updates.
Oracle-managed Virtualization: Offers trusted and secure virtualization solutions.
Fault Tolerance: Ensures reliable infrastructure with advanced engineering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

Cost Efficiency: Effective resource management compared to alternatives.
On-premises Control: Enables high-level control over critical data.
Security & Compliance: Supports data sovereignty with compliance features.
Performance Reliability: Delivers consistent high performance.

Financial institutions utilize Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer for migrating large databases while maintaining precise on-premises control. It provides a high-performance, secure solution compared to alternatives like AWS, enabling successful cross-platform migrations and efficient data management within data centers.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Edmodo

IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish Water, trueblue, AirAsia, droptank

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

June 2026

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.