Top 10 Oracle Database as a Service Alternatives

4.3 out of 5

68 reviews
97% willing to recommend

356 followers

Top Oracle Database as a Service Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Database as a Service based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Amazon RDS, MongoDB Atlas, and Microsoft Azure SQL Database. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Database as a Service surpasses its competitors by offering high-performance cloud infrastructure, seamless scalability, robust security, and advanced data management tools, providing an efficient and reliable platform for businesses to manage their data effectively.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Amazon RDS

4.2 out of 5

Amazon RDS

4.2 out of 5

Amazon RDS is valued for ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, ideal for small to medium enterprises. In comparison, Oracle Database as a Service offers advanced features and superior performance, justifying its higher price for larger enterprises. Both provide strong customer service and notable reliability.

Download Amazon RDS vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report

Pricing

Amazon RDS has a lower initial setup cost, while Oracle Database as a Service requires a higher upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Amazon RDS has a lower initial setup cost, while Oracle Database as a Service requires a higher upfront investment.

MongoDB Atlas

4.2 out of 5

MongoDB Atlas

4.2 out of 5

Oracle Database as a Service offers high performance and security for applications requiring robust disaster recovery. In comparison, MongoDB Atlas provides flexible schema architecture, supporting rapid development with ease of use, ideal for businesses seeking NoSQL solutions and scalability in dynamic environments.

Download MongoDB Atlas vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report

Pricing

Oracle Database as a Service often incurs higher setup costs, while MongoDB Atlas is generally known for lower initial expenses. This pricing difference highlights MongoDB's appeal for budget-conscious startups compared to Oracle's enterprise-level offerings.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure SQL Database

4.3 out of 5

Microsoft Azure SQL Database

4.3 out of 5

Microsoft Azure SQL Database is renowned for seamless integration with Microsoft services and ease of use. In comparison, Oracle Database as a Service excels in advanced features and scalability. Buyers might prefer Microsoft Azure for pricing flexibility and support, while Oracle is valued for complex enterprise needs despite its cost.

Download Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report

Pricing

Microsoft Azure SQL Database has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Database as a Service, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, Oracle Database as a Service offers a wider range of advanced features for enterprises willing to invest more upfront.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Cloud SQL

4.1 out of 5

Google Cloud SQL

4.1 out of 5

Google Cloud SQL is favored for its pricing and support. In comparison, Oracle Database as a Service impresses with its comprehensive features. Google Cloud SQL is ideal for those prioritizing cost-effectiveness, while Oracle Database as a Service is suited for those needing advanced analytics and extensive features.

Download Google Cloud SQL vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report

Pricing

Google Cloud SQL has an initial setup cost that is generally lower compared to Oracle Database as a Service, which requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Google Cloud SQL has an initial setup cost that is generally lower compared to Oracle Database as a Service, which requires a higher initial investment.

Google Cloud Spanner

4.5 out of 5

Google Cloud Spanner

4.5 out of 5

Oracle Database as a Service offers comprehensive data management and strong security. In comparison, Google Cloud Spanner excels in horizontal scalability and global consistency. Oracle's cost-effective pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while Google Cloud Spanner's advanced features justify its higher cost.

Download Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report

Pricing

Oracle Database as a Service has a higher setup cost compared to Google Cloud Spanner.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Database as a Service has a higher setup cost compared to Google Cloud Spanner.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

4.3 out of 5

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

4.3 out of 5

Oracle Database as a Service provides advanced features and high performance, appealing to those needing multitenancy and real application clusters. In comparison, Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers ease of integration and cost-effectiveness, suiting users who prioritize simplicity and rapid deployment.

Download Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report

Pricing

Oracle Database as a Service reviews highlight significant setup costs, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL is noted for a more affordable initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Database as a Service reviews highlight significant setup costs, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL is noted for a more affordable initial investment.

Related categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Managed NoSQL Databases

AWS Marketplace