Google Cloud Spanner vs Oracle Database as a Service comparison

Google and Oracle are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 10.0, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Google holds a 7.2% mindshare in DS, compared to Oracle’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Spanner

Read 5 Google Cloud Spanner reviews

1,281 Views
1,217 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Database as a Service

Read 69 Oracle Database as a Service reviews

1,996 Views
1,936 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Spanner

Oracle Database as a Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Oracle Database as a Service and Google Cloud Spanner are both prominent database solutions. Google Cloud Spanner appears to have the upper hand due to its scalability and feature set.

Features: Oracle Database as a Service users value its comprehensive feature set, ease of integration, and robust performance. Google Cloud Spanner users highlight its horizontal scalability, strong consistency, and global distribution capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Database as a Service could enhance its user-friendly configurations and reduce complexity. Users of Google Cloud Spanner suggest improvements in better tooling and a more intuitive API.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Database as a Service is noted for its extensive customer service, although deployment can be intricate. Google Cloud Spanner offers a smoother deployment process with less complexity, but its customer service experiences are mixed.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Database as a Service is seen as cost-effective with satisfactory ROI. Google Cloud Spanner users experience higher initial setup costs but recognize its long-term value and ROI due to its advanced features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Spanner

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

8th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database as a Service

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Spanner is 7.2%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database as a Service is 7.5%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Database as a Service	7.5%
Google Cloud Spanner	7.2%
Other	85.3%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

LijomonJose

System Architect at UST Global EspaÃ±a

Offers good performance to users

The tool lacks to offer AI features. In the future, I would like the product to offer AI features to users. Nowadays, we are creating small acronyms for our SQL Server. We put some templates. If I just put your name and stop it, the entire cloud can be explored, but such features are not there in Google Cloud Spanner. As a layman rather than a developer, if I create a tool or a procedure. If I write a procedure and then when you describe a procedure, a dummy procedure will be written for you, and it will be available for you as a template in SQL Server, but such kind features are not there in Google Cloud Spanner.

Read full review

reviewer1291212

Client CTO at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Provides high availability through replication but presents challenges with licensing complexity

The most recent vendor I am dealing with is HPE. I am not familiar with a product called Zella Security from CyberArk. I use Privileged Access Management. I work only with PAM. I deal with many vendors, and my latest vendor was CyberArk. For Google, I deal with hybrid cloud environments, both on-premises and cloud. I do the same for Microsoft as well. From Oracle, we do database management and purely focus on the database engines, and then the customer handles the schemas and the data management side of things. I don't have enough information on security in general to give a valued answer on whether I am happy with how secure the product is or if I sometimes see flaws. For Oracle, I think we have it under control. We have enough subject matter experts, so I would say it is okay to deploy Oracle Database as a Service. Usually, my clients have the solution on-premises or on the cloud as well. I would rate this review seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The application deployment in the cloud is the best feature of the infrastructure."

"Google Cloud Spanner is stable."

"It is a very scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability. Scalability comes with two options, among which Google Cloud Spanner can scale horizontally, compared to other relational databases that scale vertically."

"We can scale the solution if we need to."

"Data Guard is the best solution for Disaster Recovery."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle Database as a Service is the stopwatch."

"Oracle Database as a Service's most valuable feature is its financial applications."

"What I like about Oracle Database as a Service is that it has excellent stability, and the development is effortless. I also like the enhanced queries in Oracle Database as a Service best."

"Oracle Database as a Service is a scalable and robust solution."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Database as a Service are the ease of use. We can use a simple syntax to get data and we can easily go to procedures to see data other than using a query."

"I like the solution’s performance and real application concepts."

More Oracle Database as a Service pros

Cons

"The tool lacks to offer AI features."

"Google came up with something called Cloud Spanner Emulator, which fails to work like the real product if I want to develop some code and run a database locally on my machine."

"The tool needs to improve horizontal scaling."

"I want to improve the deployment of cameras and surveillance infrastructure."

"The cost can be a bit high."

"The initial setup could improve."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"Improvement in Oracle DBaaS could focus on enhancing performance monitoring and reporting tools."

"For many companies, the standard version is not enough. They need to move to the enterprise version. However, there is a large price jump between the two."

"The scalability is not satisfactory."

"Earlier, the interface was continuously changing. Features you used would be moved somewhere else, so it was a little challenging to navigate, but now I think it's stable."

"The solution provides the same type of RDBMS engine for all use cases. They need to provide different products that will be suitable for all use cases. The solution does not support the documentation of databases."

"The solution's pricing could be less expensive."

More Oracle Database as a Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"Price-wise, I heard that Google Cloud Spanner is on the higher side."

"Google Cloud Spanner is an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price of Oracle Database as a Service is expensive compared to other similar solutions."

"It is notably expensive when compared to the features offered by other alternatives."

"It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."

"The cost for Oracle Database as a Service is higher than that for other similar solutions."

"Oracle Database as a Service is an expensive product."

"The solution's price is reasonable but depends upon the negotiation."

"I do not know firsthand about the price of Oracle Database as a Service, but it is known that Oracle solutions tend to be priced higher than competitors."

"Oracle Database is less expensive than the previous solution we used."

More Oracle Database as a Service pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Spanner?

Google Cloud Spanner has all the features of a traditional relational database, including schemas, SQL queries, ACID transactions, and provides excellent integration and monitoring tools as well as...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Spanner?

Price-wise, I heard that Google Cloud Spanner is on the higher side. I am not sure if this is a rumor or if it's fake news, but I believe that having BigQuery and GCP together could be a little cos...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Spanner?

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database as a Service?

It has significantly enhanced our application development process by introducing substantial time savings and streamlining routine tasks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database as a Service?

The setup cost is approximately four hours.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database as a Service?

I see some negative sides that could be improved, and that is the licensing. The issue with licensing is the price and the way they license through partners.

See all answers

Comparisons

Yugabyte Platform vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 15% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 8% of the time

Yugabyte Cloud vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 7% of the time

More Google Cloud Spanner Competitors

Amazon RDS vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 19% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 14% of the time

TiDB Cloud vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Database as a Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

February 2026

Download Google Cloud Spanner product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database as a Service

January 2026

Download Oracle Database as a Service product report

Also Known As

Google Spanner

Oracle DBaaS, Oracle Database Cloud

Overview

Cloud Spanner is the first and only relational database service that is both strongly consistent and horizontally scalable. With Cloud Spanner you enjoy all the traditional benefits of a relational database: ACID transactions, relational schemas (and schema changes without downtime), SQL queries, high performance, and high availability. But unlike any other relational database service, Cloud Spanner scales horizontally, to hundreds or thousands of servers, so it can handle the highest of transactional workloads. With automatic scaling, synchronous data replication, and node redundancy, Cloud Spanner delivers up to 99.999% (five 9s) of availability for your mission critical applications. In fact, Google’s internal Spanner service has been handling millions of queries per second from many Google services for years.

Google

Oracle Database Cloud Service combines the power of Oracle Database, with the unique capabilities of the Oracle Cloud. The service provides a secure, automated data management platform that leverages on demand Oracle Cloud Infrastructure services via a simple web based user interface and RESTful API. Oracle Database Cloud Service provides elastic database services for development, test, and production environments of custom and packaged online transaction processing (OLTP), data warehousing, and mixed workload applications. It enables businesses to reap all Oracle Platform as a Service (PaaS) benefits including subscriptionbased, self-service access to reliable, scalable, and elastic cloud environments and accelerates time to value by simplifying the provisioning and administration of Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Streak, Optiva, Mixpanel

Solution-Soft, DX Marketing, Suredell and Partners, Frontiers, SettleOurEstate.com, Demand Analysis Ltd, endlich IT & Projekt Service OHG

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service

February 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.