Google Cloud Spanner vs Oracle Database as a Service comparison

Google and Oracle are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Google is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Google holds a 6.4% mindshare in DS, compared to Oracle’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Spanner

Read 5 Google Cloud Spanner reviews

1,047 Views
984 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Database as a Service

Read 69 Oracle Database as a Service reviews

1,736 Views
1,684 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Spanner

Oracle Database as a Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Oracle Database as a Service and Google Cloud Spanner are both prominent database solutions. Google Cloud Spanner appears to have the upper hand due to its scalability and feature set.

Features: Oracle Database as a Service users value its comprehensive feature set, ease of integration, and robust performance. Google Cloud Spanner users highlight its horizontal scalability, strong consistency, and global distribution capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Database as a Service could enhance its user-friendly configurations and reduce complexity. Users of Google Cloud Spanner suggest improvements in better tooling and a more intuitive API.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Database as a Service is noted for its extensive customer service, although deployment can be intricate. Google Cloud Spanner offers a smoother deployment process with less complexity, but its customer service experiences are mixed.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Database as a Service is seen as cost-effective with satisfactory ROI. Google Cloud Spanner users experience higher initial setup costs but recognize its long-term value and ROI due to its advanced features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Spanner

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

8th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database as a Service

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Spanner is 6.4%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database as a Service is 7.1%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Database as a Service	7.1%
Google Cloud Spanner	6.4%
Other	86.5%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

LijomonJose

System Architect at UST Global EspaÃ±a

Offers good performance to users

The tool lacks to offer AI features. In the future, I would like the product to offer AI features to users. Nowadays, we are creating small acronyms for our SQL Server. We put some templates. If I just put your name and stop it, the entire cloud can be explored, but such features are not there in Google Cloud Spanner. As a layman rather than a developer, if I create a tool or a procedure. If I write a procedure and then when you describe a procedure, a dummy procedure will be written for you, and it will be available for you as a template in SQL Server, but such kind features are not there in Google Cloud Spanner.

Read full review

Sadik Iqbal

Associate at Eict ltd.

Offers robust security and resilience, but high pricing impacts accessibility

Initially, I walked through Teradata and not Oracle Database. Currently, I am doing a job for an organization that uses Postgres Database and offers a cloud solution. I work in technology advocacy for partners. Cloud solutions are our focus The encryption level, resilience, and secure features…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Google Cloud Spanner is stable."

"We can scale the solution if we need to."

"It is a very scalable solution."

"The application deployment in the cloud is the best feature of the infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its scalability. Scalability comes with two options, among which Google Cloud Spanner can scale horizontally, compared to other relational databases that scale vertically."

"In terms of features, I find Automated Storage Management (ASM) and Data Guard most helpful for improving data security and reliability."

"Oracle Database as a Service is a scalable and robust solution."

"The Oracle Multitenant feature of 12c is awesome. This feature enables us to consolidate disparate databases under one container database and eases manageability of the databases. It also allows us to scale."

"The solution is scalable, has support & right incident, and allows easy data recovery."

"I would rate customer service ten out of ten."

"The product's implementation was pretty straightforward."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Database as a Service are configuration and troubleshooting."

"Oracle has helped our organization by being a reliable solution that is stable with zero crashes. The differentiation between Oracle's database and other databases is that Oracle needs more attention. It's not a click here, click there solution, it needs more time put in, but once you do that, it's ready to go and you can forget about it."

More Oracle Database as a Service pros

Cons

"I want to improve the deployment of cameras and surveillance infrastructure."

"The cost can be a bit high."

"Google came up with something called Cloud Spanner Emulator, which fails to work like the real product if I want to develop some code and run a database locally on my machine."

"The tool lacks to offer AI features."

"The tool needs to improve horizontal scaling."

"They should add more integration to the solution."

"It is very hard to support Oracle Database."

"Oracle Database as a Service is very convenient to use. However, we need to know to which schema we want it to connect specifically, and what are the username and password. The solution requires some basic knowledge of SQL RP and SQL Oracle to use it."

"When migrating to a different instance, the internal machine learning is lost."

"I have had a hard time finding some documentation. There should provide easier accessible documentation for Oracle Database as a Service."

"Debugging this solution is challenging."

"The tool's AI part has shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The tool needs to improve its pricing and stability."

More Oracle Database as a Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"Price-wise, I heard that Google Cloud Spanner is on the higher side."

"The solution is expensive."

"Google Cloud Spanner is an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."

"The price of Oracle Database as a Service is expensive compared to other similar solutions."

"I do not know firsthand about the price of Oracle Database as a Service, but it is known that Oracle solutions tend to be priced higher than competitors."

"The price depends on the solution you choose: standard, enterprise, or high performance. For example, enterprise can start between 0.4 an hour up to 1,800. Additional fees also depends on what package you choose. Your feels will be different if you choose the standard, enterprise, high performance, or extreme package. You will pay in relation to what option you ask for. The price is very good if you compare it to other databases."

"The price of Oracle Database as a Service could be better."

"The pricing is a little bit expensive."

"The pricing may seem expensive, but the value corresponds to the quality of the product."

More Oracle Database as a Service pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

10%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Spanner?

Google Cloud Spanner has all the features of a traditional relational database, including schemas, SQL queries, ACID transactions, and provides excellent integration and monitoring tools as well as...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Spanner?

Price-wise, I heard that Google Cloud Spanner is on the higher side. I am not sure if this is a rumor or if it's fake news, but I believe that having BigQuery and GCP together could be a little cos...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Spanner?

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database as a Service?

It has significantly enhanced our application development process by introducing substantial time savings and streamlining routine tasks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database as a Service?

The setup cost is approximately four hours.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database as a Service?

I see some negative sides that could be improved, and that is the licensing. The issue with licensing is the price and the way they license through partners.

See all answers

Comparisons

Yugabyte Platform vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 15% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 7% of the time

SingleStore vs Google Cloud Spanner

Compared 6% of the time

More Google Cloud Spanner Competitors

Amazon RDS vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 22% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 13% of the time

TiDB Cloud vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database as a Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Database as a Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

January 2026

Download Google Cloud Spanner product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database as a Service

January 2026

Download Oracle Database as a Service product report

Also Known As

Google Spanner

Oracle DBaaS, Oracle Database Cloud

Overview

Cloud Spanner is the first and only relational database service that is both strongly consistent and horizontally scalable. With Cloud Spanner you enjoy all the traditional benefits of a relational database: ACID transactions, relational schemas (and schema changes without downtime), SQL queries, high performance, and high availability. But unlike any other relational database service, Cloud Spanner scales horizontally, to hundreds or thousands of servers, so it can handle the highest of transactional workloads. With automatic scaling, synchronous data replication, and node redundancy, Cloud Spanner delivers up to 99.999% (five 9s) of availability for your mission critical applications. In fact, Google’s internal Spanner service has been handling millions of queries per second from many Google services for years.

Google

Oracle Database Cloud Service combines the power of Oracle Database, with the unique capabilities of the Oracle Cloud. The service provides a secure, automated data management platform that leverages on demand Oracle Cloud Infrastructure services via a simple web based user interface and RESTful API. Oracle Database Cloud Service provides elastic database services for development, test, and production environments of custom and packaged online transaction processing (OLTP), data warehousing, and mixed workload applications. It enables businesses to reap all Oracle Platform as a Service (PaaS) benefits including subscriptionbased, self-service access to reliable, scalable, and elastic cloud environments and accelerates time to value by simplifying the provisioning and administration of Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Streak, Optiva, Mixpanel

Solution-Soft, DX Marketing, Suredell and Partners, Frontiers, SettleOurEstate.com, Demand Analysis Ltd, endlich IT & Projekt Service OHG

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service

December 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Spanner vs. Oracle Database as a Service report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.