Amazon RDS vs IBM Db2 on Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 13.5% mindshare in DS, compared to IBM’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 58 Amazon RDS reviews

3,802 Views
3,650 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

IBM Db2 on Cloud

Read 2 IBM Db2 on Cloud reviews

391 Views
391 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

IBM Db2 on Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Amazon RDS and IBM Db2 on Cloud are two formidable database management solutions. IBM Db2 on Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its superior analytics and flexibility, according to user feedback.

Features: Amazon RDS is praised for its reliability, ease of use, and integration with other AWS services. IBM Db2 on Cloud is noted for its performance, flexibility, and advanced analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Amazon RDS could improve in areas like enhanced support for databases, better performance optimization, and more robust analytics features. For IBM Db2 on Cloud, users highlight the need for a more straightforward learning curve, better integration with third-party tools, and simplified deployment processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is noted for its straightforward deployment process and supportive customer service. IBM Db2 on Cloud provides a reliable deployment experience but faces criticism for its complexity. IBM is appreciated for its responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS is seen as cost-effective, offering good ROI with lower upfront setup costs. IBM Db2 on Cloud, while more expensive, delivers a strong ROI due to its powerful features. Users recognize the value in both but justify IBM Db2 on Cloud's higher cost due to its capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (9th)

IBM Db2 on Cloud

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 13.5%, down from 25.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Db2 on Cloud is 1.9%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon RDS	13.5%
IBM Db2 on Cloud	1.9%
Other	84.6%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2592669

Director Software Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Positive experiences with database services, with minor room for feature enhancements observed

I don't really see any disadvantages of Amazon RDS. With Oracle, I think AWS doesn't provide the RAC stability. If you have Oracle installed in your own data centers, you can set up various clusters and we can set up the RACs, but in Amazon RDS, we cannot have the RAC feature of Oracle. They could add that feature. Amazon RDS has limitations regarding RAC. If we talk about installing Oracle in RDS, we cannot have the RAC, but if you deploy Oracle on GCP, then there is probably the RAC feature available. I observed that around two or three years back, but I'm not sure whether they have added the RAC feature in AWS. Amazon RDS is expensive compared to GCP. GCP also has the same features, and although it is quite extensive and feature-rich, I see Amazon RDS as slightly expensive compared to other clouds.

Read full review

FarhanFarhan

Database Engineer at Meezan Bank

Multi-node architecture and it is good from a security point of view

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. Most of the issues we faced during troubleshooting were due to specific bugs in the environment, and the only solution was to upgrade the database environment or services. But it is not easy to upgrade the database level when third-party applications are involved, as they are not always comfortable with upgrading. There should be some cumulative solution provided by IBM for their customers, just like other vendors. Upgrading to a certain version doesn't always resolve the issue. It might get resolved at the database level, but what about the other applications integrated with that database that are only compatible with older versions?

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon RDS is easy to manage, and it has customizable performance, high availability, and duality."

"The product's initial setup phase is totally easy."

"The biggest advantage of Amazon RDS, which is basically an AWS service, is that you can customize it."

"The product's most valuable features are option groups, S3 integration, automated and scheduled snapshots, and cross-region replication."

"Amazon RDS handles database backup mechanisms and patch management."

"Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS."

"It handles large-scale data migrations perfectly. Amazon RDS's performance is quite good. Charges are incurred after you utilize the service"

"It's a fully managed database, so that makes our life easier from the operational standpoint. That is the key, basically."

More Amazon RDS pros

"The reliability is the most valuable feature. It is also user-friendly."

"Multiple business departments rely on reports and predictive analysis to make decisions for future business based on their data warehouse and Db2 network analytics tool. It helps our business department make decisions."

Cons

"The security features could be improved."

"The support team of Amazon RDS provides us with some links to go through whenever we face some issues, but it doesn't work for us."

"The only thing that needs improvement would be the pricing of the solution."

"If Amazon RDS can be provided as a service platform, it would be beneficial for years. Instead of focusing on infrastructure, they can assist backend engineers and those with varying technical expertise in utilizing it effectively. It would be helpful if Amazon could provide a more predictable pricing strategy."

"If we do not keep track of our costs, we might face some problems."

"I would like to see improvements in the tool's automatic restart."

"I feel Amazon RDS should have a lot of functionalities to make monitoring within the database easier."

"The setup might be a bit challenging for multi-level applications."

More Amazon RDS cons

"In other environments like Oracle or Teradata, they provide their own solutions for troubleshooting issues. They provide built-in AI services or autonomous databases, which I don't see in the Db2 environment."

"I would give their support a ten if they had more tutorials available."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is good."

"Amazon RDS is less expensive than other solutions."

"The solution's pricing needs improvement."

"The solution is expensive."

"The solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"The cost is manageable because you can see the expense associated with each instance and utilize tools for tagging and cost control."

"Amazon RDS is not a very expensive solution."

"Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

The pricing for Amazon RDS is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

Currently, I cannot think of any major improvements. Perhaps more platforms in terms of database engine versions would be beneficial. Right now, Amazon RDS supports MySQL and PostgreSQL, but there ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Db2 on Cloud?

In other environments like Oracle or Teradata, they provide their own solutions for troubleshooting issues. They provide built-in AI services or autonomous databases, which I don't see in the Db2 e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Db2 on Cloud?

Since I have worked with almost every product, including IBM, Teradata is far better than any other data warehouse product. It's a separate database with its own features, architecture, and working...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Db2 on Cloud?

It's a multi-node logical database clustered in three physical nodes. We use a lot of services already provided in our private cloud environment. It's a multi-node architecture.

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 19% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 10% of the time

SingleStore vs Amazon RDS

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs IBM Db2 on Cloud

Compared 29% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs IBM Db2 on Cloud

Compared 26% of the time

More IBM Db2 on Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

February 2026

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

February 2026

Download IBM Db2 on Cloud product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

A fully-managed cloud SQL database. Powered by a turbo-charged Db2 engine.

IBM

Sample Customers

Edmodo

Owens-Illinois, KONE Corp., Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue, Canon Europe, Delhaize America, Wimbledon

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud

February 2026

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.