Amazon RDS vs IBM Db2 on Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while IBM is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 14.8% mindshare in DS, compared to IBM’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Amazon RDS

Read 58 Amazon RDS reviews

3,594 Views
3,486 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

IBM Db2 on Cloud

Read 2 IBM Db2 on Cloud reviews

359 Views
359 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

IBM Db2 on Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2024

Amazon RDS and IBM Db2 on Cloud are two formidable database management solutions. IBM Db2 on Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its superior analytics and flexibility, according to user feedback.

Features: Amazon RDS is praised for its reliability, ease of use, and integration with other AWS services. IBM Db2 on Cloud is noted for its performance, flexibility, and advanced analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Amazon RDS could improve in areas like enhanced support for databases, better performance optimization, and more robust analytics features. For IBM Db2 on Cloud, users highlight the need for a more straightforward learning curve, better integration with third-party tools, and simplified deployment processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon RDS is noted for its straightforward deployment process and supportive customer service. IBM Db2 on Cloud provides a reliable deployment experience but faces criticism for its complexity. IBM is appreciated for its responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS is seen as cost-effective, offering good ROI with lower upfront setup costs. IBM Db2 on Cloud, while more expensive, delivers a strong ROI due to its powerful features. Users recognize the value in both but justify IBM Db2 on Cloud's higher cost due to its capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (9th)

IBM Db2 on Cloud

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 14.8%, down from 25.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Db2 on Cloud is 2.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon RDS	14.8%
IBM Db2 on Cloud	2.1%
Other	83.1%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2592669

Director Software Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Positive experiences with database services, with minor room for feature enhancements observed

I don't really see any disadvantages of Amazon RDS. With Oracle, I think AWS doesn't provide the RAC stability. If you have Oracle installed in your own data centers, you can set up various clusters and we can set up the RACs, but in Amazon RDS, we cannot have the RAC feature of Oracle. They could add that feature. Amazon RDS has limitations regarding RAC. If we talk about installing Oracle in RDS, we cannot have the RAC, but if you deploy Oracle on GCP, then there is probably the RAC feature available. I observed that around two or three years back, but I'm not sure whether they have added the RAC feature in AWS. Amazon RDS is expensive compared to GCP. GCP also has the same features, and although it is quite extensive and feature-rich, I see Amazon RDS as slightly expensive compared to other clouds.

Read full review

FarhanFarhan

Database Engineer at Meezan Bank

Multi-node architecture and it is good from a security point of view

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. Most of the issues we faced during troubleshooting were due to specific bugs in the environment, and the only solution was to upgrade the database environment or services. But it is not easy to upgrade the database level when third-party applications are involved, as they are not always comfortable with upgrading. There should be some cumulative solution provided by IBM for their customers, just like other vendors. Upgrading to a certain version doesn't always resolve the issue. It might get resolved at the database level, but what about the other applications integrated with that database that are only compatible with older versions?

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon RDS is lightweight and flexible."

"I recommend RDS because it makes your life super easy."

"The solution’s scalability, usability, and availability are valuable to us."

"Amazon RDS is easy to maintain and easy to deploy."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon RDS is its performance."

"The solution is good for on-premise deployments."

"The impact of Amazon RDS scalability and backup has been positive, with good vertical scaling, scale up and down, horizontal scaling, and storage scaling."

"It is very easy to set up initially."

More Amazon RDS pros

"Multiple business departments rely on reports and predictive analysis to make decisions for future business based on their data warehouse and Db2 network analytics tool. It helps our business department make decisions."

"The reliability is the most valuable feature. It is also user-friendly."

Cons

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The backup and restore processes take more time compared to other providers. For instance, if DigitalOcean takes two minutes to restore or create a backup, AWS will take 2 to 3 minutes."

"Amazon cannot guarantee the stability of some extensions, and there is a need for different extensions to meet PCI requirements."

"Technical support could be better."

"They should add a feature for manual SQL patching in RDS."

"You can only get access from the sales support. That means if you want to buy something or renew your subscription or upgrade, all these services are easily available. Yet, if you would like to get some technical support, you have to pay for it. You have to pay for an additional subscription."

"Currently, speaking of Microsoft SQL on RDS, you don't have a full option to be able to use it directly on RDS. So, it needs improvement."

"In the next release, it would be great to have access to core parameters to improve or tweak the performance."

More Amazon RDS cons

"In other environments like Oracle or Teradata, they provide their own solutions for troubleshooting issues. They provide built-in AI services or autonomous databases, which I don't see in the Db2 environment."

"I would give their support a ten if they had more tutorials available."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS is becoming pretty expensive because cheap or absolutely free services have become paid services. Amazon RDS is not an expensive product, but Amazon's ecosystem is becoming increasingly expensive."

"We are paying for a service license."

"The solution's pricing needs improvement."

"The price of Amazon RDS is expensive."

"Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."

"The prices for different regions are different."

"The substantial initial credit and cost-effectiveness make Amazon an attractive option."

"The solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

The pricing for Amazon RDS is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

Currently, I cannot think of any major improvements. Perhaps more platforms in terms of database engine versions would be beneficial. Right now, Amazon RDS supports MySQL and PostgreSQL, but there ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Db2 on Cloud?

In other environments like Oracle or Teradata, they provide their own solutions for troubleshooting issues. They provide built-in AI services or autonomous databases, which I don't see in the Db2 e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Db2 on Cloud?

Since I have worked with almost every product, including IBM, Teradata is far better than any other data warehouse product. It's a separate database with its own features, architecture, and working...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Db2 on Cloud?

It's a multi-node logical database clustered in three physical nodes. We use a lot of services already provided in our private cloud environment. It's a multi-node architecture.

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 20% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Amazon RDS

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 12% of the time

Redis vs Amazon RDS

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs IBM Db2 on Cloud

Compared 31% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs IBM Db2 on Cloud

Compared 25% of the time

More IBM Db2 on Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

January 2026

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

January 2026

Download IBM Db2 on Cloud product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

A fully-managed cloud SQL database. Powered by a turbo-charged Db2 engine.

IBM

Sample Customers

Edmodo

Owens-Illinois, KONE Corp., Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue, Canon Europe, Delhaize America, Wimbledon

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. IBM Db2 on Cloud report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.