Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Redshift vs Snowflake comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 22, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.2
Amazon Redshift ROI varies; cloud transition boosts sales but data volume impacts cost-effectiveness compared to databases like Netezza.
Sentiment score
6.8
Snowflake users experience mixed ROI; challenges in calculation exist, but long-term benefits include cost reduction and improved data management.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Amazon Redshift's customer service is praised for efficiency and professionalism, though some desire easier phone access and consistent availability.
Sentiment score
5.7
Snowflake's customer service is praised for expertise and helpfulness, though some note delays and lack of SLAs.
Whenever we need support, if there is an issue accessing stored data due to regional data center problems, the Amazon team is very helpful and provides optimal solutions quickly.
It's costly when you enable support.
I received great support in migrating data to Snowflake, with quick responses and innovative solutions.
The technical support from Snowflake is very good, nice, and efficient.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Redshift is popular for its easy scalability on AWS, although some users face challenges with large cluster configurations.
Sentiment score
7.8
Snowflake is praised for scalability and efficiency, but concerns exist regarding cost-effectiveness in medium to large-scale organizations.
The scalability part needs improvement as the sizing requires trial and error.
Snowflake is very scalable and has a dedicated team constantly improving the product.
The billing doubles with size increase, but processing does not necessarily speed up accordingly.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Amazon Redshift is stable with minor scaling challenges, appreciated AWS support, and noted visibility concerns versus Snowflake.
Sentiment score
8.2
Snowflake is praised for stability and reliability, with users noting excellent performance, quick issue resolution, and robust architecture.
Amazon Redshift is a stable product, and I would rate it nine or ten out of ten for stability.
Snowflake is very stable, especially when used with AWS.
Snowflake as a SaaS offering means that maintenance isn't an issue for me.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon Redshift users struggle with data management, pricing, performance, integration, UI support, and compatibility with various data types.
Snowflake users seek improved UI, pricing transparency, analytics, integrations, AI features, and enhanced support, ETL, and machine learning capabilities.
They should bring the entire ETL data management process into Amazon Redshift.
Integration with AI could be a good improvement.
Enhancements in user experience for data observability and quality checks would be beneficial, as these tasks currently require SQL coding, which might be challenging for some users.
Cost reduction is one area I would like Snowflake to improve.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Redshift offers competitive pricing with scalable costs, ideal for large enterprises, though not as economical for smaller companies.
Snowflake's pricing offers flexibility but can be unpredictable and expensive compared to Redshift or BigQuery, with room for transparency improvements.
It's a pretty good price and reasonable for the product quality.
The cost of technical support is high.
The pricing of Amazon Redshift is expensive.
Snowflake's pricing is on the higher side.
Snowflake lacks transparency in estimating resource usage.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Redshift offers scalable, efficient, and secure data warehousing with fast processing, AWS integration, and flexible configurations for analytics.
Snowflake excels in scalable, secure data processing with fast queries, multi-format support, and seamless third-party integration for AI/ML.
Amazon Redshift's performance optimization and scalability are quite helpful, providing functionalities such as scaling up and down.
Scalability is also a strong point; I can scale it however I want without any limitations.
The specific features of Amazon Redshift that are beneficial for handling large data sets include fast retrieval due to cloud services and scalability, which allows us to retrieve data quickly.
Snowflake is a data lake on the cloud where all processing happens in memory, resulting in very fast query responses.
Being able to perform AI and Machine Learning in the same location as the data is quite advantageous.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
71
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Snowflake
Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
100
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (1st), AI Synthetic Data (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of Amazon Redshift is 7.5%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snowflake is 18.2%, down from 23.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Warehouse
 

Q&A Highlights

Padmanesh NC - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2017
 

Featured Reviews

Sriram-Natesan - PeerSpot reviewer
The ability to create a lot of views or materialized views is beneficial
Improvement in the immediate response and the process of getting into a call could be helpful. We have had to wait for at least twenty-four hours to get a call and then wait for a couple more hours for a solution. Improved connectivity to different BI tools and already published connectors for major tools in AWS could enhance the service.
Snehasish Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Transformation in data querying speed with good migration capabilities
Snowflake is a data lake on the cloud where all processing happens in memory, resulting in very fast query responses. One key feature is the separation of compute and storage, which eliminates storage limitations. It also has tools for migrating data from legacy databases like Oracle. Its stability and efficiency enhance performance greatly. Tools in the AI/ML marketplace are readily available without needing development.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

Padmanesh NC - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 26, 2017
Dec 26, 2017
Interesting. Snowflake has a fundamentally different architecture in that compute and storage are completely separated allowing you to scale each dynamically and independently This makes me to get into Snowflake, Almost I am using Snowflake last 8 months. Its awesome.
2 out of 4 answers
it_user492777 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 20, 2017
Wow, that is a loaded question and hard to answer and not sound like a sales pitch (I will try). For one, Snowflake has a fundamentally different architecture in that compute and storage are completely separated allowing you to scale each dynamically and independently. That is as you load data the space just expands - no need to add more clusters, extents, files etc. Likewise if you need more compute power, you can resize the compute clusters on the fly using a drop down in the UI to add more nodes while the process is running. No need to put it in read only mode, export the data, then import to a bigger cluster. This is only possible because of the separation of compute and storage. Most other architectures (based on legacy systems) have the compute and storage more tightly coupled. Along with this architecture you can create multiple independent compute clusters of differing sizes and assign each to different work groups or workloads (with access to the same single data store - no data replication required). With this each group gets its own dedicated compute resource such that what one does will not impact performance of the others. This is all new code - not a refactoring of any other RDBMS code base so the founders were able to create features that take advantage of the elasticity of the cloud. In addition Snwoflake can ingest JSON data natively into relational table using a new data type designed to hold semi-structured data (which allows true schema on read using SQL). Very stable - over 400 customers to date. Some with over 1 PB of data and hundreds of users. It also has built in security -256 bit AES encryption of all data in motion and at rest by default with no impact on query performance. Pricing (I am not in sales!) - the pricing is public and on the website: https://www.snowflake.net/product/pricing/ You can check my post about my favorite features for more details: https://www.snowflake.net/top-10-cool-things-i-like-about-snowflake/ As for comparisons to RedShift you would have to talk with some real customers who have done the POCs with both of us. You might also look at some of the customer videos and case studies, but none of them really call out where we replaced RedShift as that tends to be kept confidential. https://www.snowflake.net/our-customers/
MM
Dec 25, 2017
Although I verified it only in a specific case, I performed performance verification with Redshift, BigQuery, Snowflake. Redshift has data redistribution occurred when searching under various conditions and performance was not good, but Snowflake holds data in small units called micro partitions, and also manages data for each column Therefore, operation like data redistribution was minimal and high performance was obtained. Snowflake can also start multiple clusters in the same database, but has an architecture in which conflicts do not occur even when accessing the same data between clusters. I recommend you to try it.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
35%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Educational Organization
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
What do you like most about Snowflake?
The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Snowflake?
It is complicated to understand how requests impact warehouse size. Unlike competitors such as Microsoft and Databricks ( /products/databricks-reviews ), Snowflake lacks transparency in estimating ...
What needs improvement with Snowflake?
There is a need for a tool to help me estimate the cost of using Snowflake. Enhancements in user experience for data observability and quality checks would be beneficial, as these tasks currently r...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Snowflake Computing
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Redshift vs. Snowflake and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.