

Amazon EMR and Snowflake are key players in the data processing and warehousing segment. Snowflake appears to have an edge due to its flexible architecture and ease of scalability.
Features: Amazon EMR offers scalability, cost-effectiveness, and integration with Hadoop and HDFS. It provides easy management via a web console and API. Snowflake features easy scaling with a distributed architecture, supports multiple file formats, and offers flexibility with features like time travel and zero copy cloning.
Room for Improvement: Amazon EMR could enhance configuration simplicity, monitoring, debugging, and user learning curve. Snowflake needs to improve geospatial query capabilities, pricing clarity, and integration with data catalogs and machine learning features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Amazon EMR and Snowflake are primarily used in public clouds, though Snowflake provides hybrid deployment flexibility. Amazon EMR's support is generally good and responsive, while Snowflake's customer service has mixed reviews with inconsistencies reported.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon EMR is priced with EC2 fees and resource use, potentially leading to unexpected charges if unmanaged. Snowflake's pay-as-you-go model is appreciated for its transparency, though some find it expensive. Both platforms offer high ROI, especially for those moving from on-premise systems.
They help with billing, cost determination, IAM properties, security compliance, and deployment and migration activities.
We get all call support, screen sharing support, and immediate support, so there are no problems.
I would rate the technical support from Amazon as ten out of ten.
We sought this documentation multiple times but faced difficulty in obtaining it.
I received great support in migrating data to Snowflake, with quick responses and innovative solutions.
I am satisfied with the work of technical support from Snowflake; they are responsive and helpful.
Scalability can be provisioned using the auto-scaling feature, EC2 instances, on-demand instances, and storage locations like block storage, S3, or file storage.
Snowflake is very scalable and has a dedicated team constantly improving the product.
The billing doubles with size increase, but processing does not necessarily speed up accordingly.
Recently, Snowflake has introduced streaming capabilities, real-time and dynamic tables, along with various connectors.
Regular updates, patch installations, monitoring, logging, alerting, and disaster recovery activities are crucial for maintaining stability.
Snowflake is highly stable and performs well even with large data sets exceeding terabytes, maintaining stability throughout.
Snowflake is very stable, especially when used with AWS.
Snowflake as a SaaS offering means that maintenance isn't an issue for me.
The cost factor differs significantly. When you run Spark application on EKS, you run at the pod level, so you can control the compute cost. But in Amazon EMR, when you have to run one application, you have to launch the entire EC2.
There is room for improvement with respect to retries, handling the volume of data on S3 buckets, cluster provisioning, scaling, termination, security, and integration between services like S3, Glue, Lake Formation, and DynamoDB.
I have thoughts on what would be great to see in the product, such as AI/ML features or additional options.
Enhancements in user experience for data observability and quality checks would be beneficial, as these tasks currently require SQL coding, which might be challenging for some users.
What things you are going with to ask the support and how we manage the relationship matters a lot.
If more connectors were brought in and more visibility features were added, particularly around cost tracking in the FinOps area, it would be beneficial.
Costs are involved based on cluster resources, data volumes, EC2 instances, instance sizes, Kubernetes, Docker services, storage, and data transfers.
I would rate the price for Amazon EMR, where one is high and ten is low, as a good one.
When it comes to cloud support, the setup cost is very cheap compared to other platforms, such as Oracle or PostgreSQL, which typically require higher costs.
Snowflake's pricing is on the higher side.
Snowflake lacks transparency in estimating resource usage.
Amazon EMR helps in scalability, real-time and batch processing of data, handling efficient data sources, and managing data lakes, data stores, and data marts on file systems and in S3 buckets.
Amazon EMR provides out-of-the-box functionality because we can deploy and get Spark functionality over Hadoop.
The features at Amazon EMR that I have found most valuable are fully customizable functions.
We had a comparison with Databricks and Snowflake a few months back, and this auto-scaling takes an edge within Snowflake; that's what our observation reflects.
I have used the Snowflake Zero-Copy Cloning feature in the past while prototyping data in lower environments. This feature is helpful as it saves a lot of time during the data replication process.
Snowflake has contributed to significant cost savings.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Snowflake | 15.9% |
| Amazon EMR | 3.5% |
| Other | 80.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 58 |
Snowflake provides a modern data warehousing solution with features designed for seamless integration, scalability, and consumption-based pricing. It handles large datasets efficiently, making it a market leader for businesses migrating to the cloud.
Snowflake offers a flexible architecture that separates storage and compute resources, supporting efficient ETL jobs. Known for scalability and ease of use, it features built-in time zone conversion and robust data sharing capabilities. Its enhanced security, performance, and ability to handle semi-structured data are notable. Users suggest improvements in UI, pricing, on-premises integration, and data science functions, while calling for better transaction performance and machine learning capabilities. Users benefit from effective SQL querying, real-time analytics, and sharing options, supporting comprehensive data analysis with tools like Tableau and Power BI.
What are Snowflake's Key Features?
What Benefits Should You Look for?
In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, Snowflake's flexible data warehousing and analytics capabilities facilitate cloud migration, streamline data storage, and allow organizations to consolidate data from multiple sources for advanced insights and AI-driven strategies. Its integration with analytics tools supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting tasks.
We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.