No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Amazon EMR vs HPE Data Fabric comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EMR
Ranking in Hadoop
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Warehouse (14th)
HPE Data Fabric
Ranking in Hadoop
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Hadoop category, the mindshare of Amazon EMR is 10.0%, down from 13.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Data Fabric is 9.8%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Hadoop Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Amazon EMR10.0%
HPE Data Fabric9.8%
Other80.2%
Hadoop
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1343079 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Chief Engineer (Enterprise System Presales/Postsales) at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Has simplified ETL workflows with on-demand processing but needs improved cost efficiency and visibility
I have used AWS Glue with S3 for making tables and databases, but regarding Amazon EMR, I do not remember much as we are currently using it very minimally. This is my observation: In EKS, we have had to deploy by ourselves because EKS does not provide the Hadoop framework, Spark, Hive, and everything, but we have completed all the deployment ourselves. Whereas Amazon EMR provides all these things. The cost factor differs significantly. When you run Spark application on EKS, you run at the pod level, so you can control the compute cost. But in Amazon EMR, when you have to run one application, you have to launch the entire EC2. In Qubole, the interface was very good. I could see many details because in Amazon EMR console, very few details are available. In Qubole, at one link, you can get all the details of what is happening, how the processes are running, and the cost decreased by using Qubole. I found Qubole more user-friendly and cost-effective. From the security point of view, we had to open some access rights to Qubole, which might be a drawback in comparison to Amazon EMR which is native to AWS.
Hamid M. Hamid - PeerSpot reviewer
Data architect at Banking Sector
A stable and scalable tool that serves as a great database
The initial setup of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric is easy. I am not sure how long it took to deploy HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, but I haven't heard about any disadvantages when it comes to the time taken for the deployment. I remember that one of our company's clients who had purchased the product never mentioned the product's setup phase being complex. One of the drawbacks with HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric stems from the fact that the product's upgrade was not straightforward, and it was a complex process since one of the teams in my company who deals with the tool found the upgrade part to be tough. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. My company has two dedicated staff members to look after the deployment and maintenance phases of HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is scalable."
"A highly scalable platform to run vast amounts of data processing with very high efficiency."
"The ability to resize the cluster is what really makes it stand out over other Hadoop and big data solutions."
"This tool is simple to use and it's really accessible to many dev teams."
"It allows users to access the data through a web interface."
"The security of the managed workflow and the managed services are the best features for us. Since we inherited their security model and it's all managed services, those are the key benefits for our clients."
"Overall a good cloud infrastructure and takes the burden of managing the distributed hardware and can easily scale up and scale down as per the requirement of the task at hand."
"The stability of the product has been great overall."
"The model creation was very interesting, especially with the libraries provided by the platform."
"Our customer purchased a paid support service and so far MapR has addressed our issues well."
"Outside of human error, MapR is probably the most stable of the major releases."
"I highly recommend MapR."
"The fact that the heavy computation is required on Big Data can be distributed across many nodes in a cluster, makes this solution a winner."
"Initial setup is rather straightforward thanks to detailed documentation covering all the bases."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"This product enabled us opening up endless possibilities in data analytics, IOE/IOT, and predictive analysis."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"Spark jobs take longer on Amazon EMR compared to previous experiences."
"The solution can become expensive if you are not careful."
"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."
"The product's features for storing data in static clusters could be better."
"Better monitoring, debugging, and stability are all needed."
"Modules and strategies should be better handled and notified early in advance."
"There is room for improvement with respect to retries, handling the volume of data on S3 buckets, cluster provisioning, scaling, termination, security, and integration between services like S3, Glue, Lake Formation, and DynamoDB."
"Having the ability to extend the services provided by the platform to an API architecture, a micro-services architecture, could be very helpful."
"One weakness for MapR is the Kerberos support."
"The biggest drawback is that it has vendor locking."
"I'd say we've had issues with pricing."
"The UI for administration still has a lot of manual work to set up the cluster and get it running."
"Installations and setups are still a bit cryptic and can be improved."
"It'd like to see file system auditing, data encryption, and certification of other vendors' tools."
"The deployment could be faster. I want more support for the data lake in the next release."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."
"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."
"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."
"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."
"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."
"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."
"The price of the solution is expensive."
"Amazon EMR is not very expensive."
"HPE is flexible with you if you are an existing customer. They offer different models that might be beneficial for your organization. It all depends on how you negotiate."
"The tool's price is cheap and based on a usage basis. The solution's licensing costs are yearly and there are no extra costs."
"There is a need for my company to pay for the licensing costs of the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Construction Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Healthcare Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EMR?
I would rate the price for Amazon EMR, where one is high and ten is low, as a good one.
What needs improvement with Amazon EMR?
I feel some lack of functionality in Amazon EMR. I have thoughts on what would be great to see in the product, such as AI/ML features or additional options.
What advice do you have for others considering Amazon EMR?
I find it easy to integrate Amazon EMR with other AWS services like S3 or EC2 for data processing needs. I would rate this review as eight out of ten.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic MapReduce
MapR, MapR Data Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Yelp
Valence Health, Goodgame Studios, Pico, Terbium Labs, sovrn, Harte Hanks, Quantium, Razorsight, Novartis, Experian, Dentsu ix, Pontis Transitions, DataSong, Return Path, RAPP, HP
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EMR vs. HPE Data Fabric and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.