Snowflake and Azure Data Factory are competitors in the data integration and management category. Between the two, Snowflake seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced data warehousing features and flexibility.
Features: Snowflake offers excellent scalability for handling petabytes of data, dynamic adjustments in node size, and access to multiple file formats such as CSV and JSON. Snowpipe enables real-time data ingestion, and time travel allows historical data access. Azure Data Factory supports a wide range of integrations, has strong data transformation capabilities, and features a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, making it robust for orchestration tasks.
Room for Improvement: Snowflake could improve spatial components, auto-ingestion for streaming data, and user interfaces. Its pricing model needs more clarity. Azure Data Factory would benefit from better merge statement support, enhanced complex data transformation features, and improved integration with non-Microsoft services.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snowflake is mainly deployed on public clouds, offering broad environmental support with robust documentation and responsive support. However, users note the lack of detailed service level agreements. Azure Data Factory similarly focuses on public cloud deployment, offering reliable support but users encounter challenges in complex scenarios.
Pricing and ROI: Snowflake has a pay-as-you-go pricing model with credit-based costs, charging for compute resources separately from storage. Its unpredictability is a concern for some users. Azure Data Factory's pay-per-use model is appreciated for flexibility, with users noting its cost-effectiveness in reducing integration expenses. Both promise ROI through operational efficiencies and scalable management.
Our stakeholders and clients have expressed satisfaction with Azure Data Factory's efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
The technical support from Microsoft is rated an eight out of ten.
The technical support is responsive and helpful
The technical support for Azure Data Factory is generally acceptable.
I received great support in migrating data to Snowflake, with quick responses and innovative solutions.
The technical support from Snowflake is very good, nice, and efficient.
Azure Data Factory is highly scalable.
The billing doubles with size increase, but processing does not necessarily speed up accordingly.
Snowflake is very scalable and has a dedicated team constantly improving the product.
The solution has a high level of stability, roughly a nine out of ten.
Snowflake as a SaaS offering means that maintenance isn't an issue for me.
Snowflake is very stable, especially when used with AWS.
There is a problem with the integration with third-party solutions, particularly with SAP.
When using Git services, there are challenges with linked services and triggers getting overridden when moving between different environments (Dev, UAT, Prod).
Sometimes, the compute fails to process data if there is a heavy load suddenly, and it doesn't scale up automatically.
Enhancements in user experience for data observability and quality checks would be beneficial, as these tasks currently require SQL coding, which might be challenging for some users.
Cost reduction is one area I would like Snowflake to improve.
The pricing is cost-effective.
It is considered cost-effective.
Snowflake's pricing is on the higher side.
Snowflake lacks transparency in estimating resource usage.
It connects to different sources out-of-the-box, making integration much easier.
The platform excels in handling major datasets, particularly when working with Power BI for reporting purposes.
The interface of Azure Data Factory is very usable with a more interactive visual experience, making it easier for people who are not as experienced in coding to work with.
One key feature is the separation of compute and storage, which eliminates storage limitations.
The scalability options it provides, addressing issues without tying workloads into one virtual machine, enhance functionality.
Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.
Snowflake provides a modern data warehousing solution with features designed for seamless integration, scalability, and consumption-based pricing. It handles large datasets efficiently, making it a market leader for businesses migrating to the cloud.
Snowflake offers a flexible architecture that separates storage and compute resources, supporting efficient ETL jobs. Known for scalability and ease of use, it features built-in time zone conversion and robust data sharing capabilities. Its enhanced security, performance, and ability to handle semi-structured data are notable. Users suggest improvements in UI, pricing, on-premises integration, and data science functions, while calling for better transaction performance and machine learning capabilities. Users benefit from effective SQL querying, real-time analytics, and sharing options, supporting comprehensive data analysis with tools like Tableau and Power BI.
What are Snowflake's Key Features?In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, Snowflake's flexible data warehousing and analytics capabilities facilitate cloud migration, streamline data storage, and allow organizations to consolidate data from multiple sources for advanced insights and AI-driven strategies. Its integration with analytics tools supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting tasks.
We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
