Amazon SimpleDB vs Claris FileMaker comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Apple are both solutions in the Non-Relational Databases category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Apple is ranked #3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.0% mindshare in NRD, compared to Apple’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Apple users who would recommend it.

Amazon SimpleDB

Read 1 Amazon SimpleDB review

420 Views
248 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Claris FileMaker

Read 5 Claris FileMaker reviews

597 Views
597 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Amazon SimpleDB

Claris FileMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon SimpleDB and Claris FileMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxData, Oracle, Apple and others in Non-Relational Databases.

To learn more, read our detailed Non-Relational Databases Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Non-Relational Databases

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon SimpleDB

Ranking in Non-Relational Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (18th)

Claris FileMaker

Ranking in Non-Relational Databases

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Non-Relational Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon SimpleDB is 4.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Claris FileMaker is 5.9%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Non-Relational Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Claris FileMaker	5.9%
Amazon SimpleDB	4.0%
Other	90.1%

Non-Relational Databases

Featured Reviews

BalakrishnaVegi

SAP Senior Architect at Cognizant

Adapting to changing data needs with reduced development time and schema flexibility

Amazon SimpleDB is beneficial to me due to its reduced development time, adaptability, improved agility, and its ability to handle unstructured data. It also offers schema flexibility, which aids me in documentation, version control, modular design, data normalization, and denormalization. With this, I have a clear understanding of the data, considering future challenges, and designing for expansion.

Read full review

reviewer1668102

Director, Service Training at a construction company with 5,001-10,000 employees

User friendly with a good interface and good scalability

I like FileMaker due to the fact that it's relational. You can put it right in and it's user-friendly. It's easy to code and it's easy to make things. You can design reports and so on. It doesn't require a whole lot of coding experience. I've used FileMaker in the past. I've used a program, platform called Omnis, which is a RAD, a rapid application development program. We're just trying to find some tools. We've got lots of data, lots of data and Excel has not changed since 1989 or thereabouts. The structure has not changed. It's still the same old entry formula, and you've got limited space and no debugger. Its reporting is not easy. You could spend your life understanding Excel. No one can afford to do that anymore. FileMaker is much easier. It's a pretty good tool and there's a lot of support and there's a lot of people out there that know how to use it. FileMaker has done a good job setting up value-added resellers, much like Adobe Connect. It has a pretty good interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon SimpleDB is beneficial to me due to its reduced development time, adaptability, improved agility, and its ability to handle unstructured data."

"It is a great starter to commence with in the world of database management, even if you have limited development knowledge and is a sure bet for professional and long term expansion."

"FileMaker is much easier, it's a pretty good tool and there's a lot of support and there's a lot of people out there that know how to use it."

"I have found its resilience to attack most valuable. It's really difficult to attack the software."

"It's a good application that's easy to use."

"I have found its resilience to attack most valuable; it's really difficult to attack the software and it's really stable as well."

"It's a pretty good tool and there's a lot of support and there's a lot of people out there that know how to use it."

"The cross-platform Mac and Windows feature is most valuable. I can do all sorts of stuff with this tool. It has got all sorts of automation capabilities. I have used some of them, but I have barely scratched the surface of what it can do on automation. It is user-friendly, and it integrates well with other products. There are other third-party options that you can buy or in some cases, download for free to even extend it further. I use one or two of those."

"The database is the most useful aspect of the solution; it's a good application that's easy to use."

More Claris FileMaker pros

Cons

"The ability to adapt database structures like tables and data types to changing data requirements without causing major disruptions or extensive code changes is an area where I feel improvement is needed."

"The UE is not very up-to-date. It looks like something that was created in the 90s. In that sense, the user experience is lacking."

"There is some organizational stuff that I'd like to see done differently."

"Customer Service: We work from Asia and support is particular poor."

"They're always improving it, and I have been quite pleased with their improvements. There is some organizational stuff that I'd like to see done differently. They should make a structure so that you can have the data in one file and the app, the scripts, and the program in another file. I would like to be able to easily share scripts between different databases. I write stuff, and some of the functions are shared across different databases. So, I have to copy them from one database to another. I wouldn't mind an infrastructure where I had a file, and on loading the program, this file is loaded with the functions that I had written. I can then call them from any database that I happen to be using. Currently, you have a database open that has all of its data pieces and program pieces, and then you open another database that has got all of its data pieces and program pieces. Nothing is shared between them. When I write a complex function and I want to use it in two or three different databases, I have to copy it to each one of them and also remember where all it is used. It would be good if it has a little bit different organizational structure so that you could put your shared stuff in one place, and it loads the stuff. It is just an architectural difference. I've sent this requirement to them, but I doubt if that's going to happen. It is a huge system, and making changes for a single individual doesn't happen that quickly."

"It has some limits in terms of scalability. FileMaker is good for small and medium-sized companies. When data grows, in the case of a bigger corporation, it will be difficult to scale it."

"FileMaker has some convoluted pricing."

"Multimedia data management is not really developed in FileMaker."

"The UE is not very up-to-date. It looks like something that was created in the 90s."

More Claris FileMaker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Its price is pretty reasonable. I am at a university. We get educational discount pricing from most of the major vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon SimpleDB?

I find the price of Amazon SimpleDB to be relatively high compared to other solutions available in the market like Microsoft and other cloud services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon SimpleDB?

The ability to adapt database structures like tables and data types to changing data requirements without causing major disruptions or extensive code changes is an area where I feel improvement is ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon SimpleDB?

I use Amazon SimpleDB for managing my SAP database.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Google Cloud Bigtable vs Amazon SimpleDB

Compared 38% of the time

Oracle Berkeley DB vs Amazon SimpleDB

Compared 24% of the time

Actian NoSQL Object Database vs Amazon SimpleDB

Compared 18% of the time

More Amazon SimpleDB Competitors

Oracle Berkeley DB vs Claris FileMaker

Compared 36% of the time

Google Cloud Bigtable vs Claris FileMaker

Compared 29% of the time

Aurea Sonic XML Server vs Claris FileMaker

Compared 14% of the time

More Claris FileMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Non-Relational Databases

April 2026

Download Amazon SimpleDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Claris FileMaker

May 2026

Download Claris FileMaker product report

Also Known As

SimpleDB

No data available

Overview

Amazon SimpleDB is a scalable, flexible non-relational data store designed for large-scale distributed systems, empowering developers to efficiently manage and query structured data. It simplifies the management of the database infrastructure.

Amazon SimpleDB allows developers to offload database operations and focus on application logic. It eliminates the need to manage hardware or software, offering automatic storage scalability and making it suitable for applications with unpredictable workloads. SimpleDB's hassle-free administration and schema flexibility enable users to quickly develop data-intensive applications without traditional database constraints.

What are the key features of Amazon SimpleDB?

Schema-less data model: Provides flexibility for storing heterogeneous data
Automatic indexing: Automatically indexes data for faster query results
Highly available: Ensures data durability and availability via data replication
Flexible querying: Offers a simple query language for fast data retrieval

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Amazon SimpleDB?

Reduced overhead: Minimizes operational responsibilities freeing resources
Cost-effectiveness: Pay-as-you-go model aligns costs with usage
Scalability: Seamlessly scales with application demand
Development speed: Rapid application development due to schema flexibility

Amazon SimpleDB finds use in industries like e-commerce for catalog services, where schema-less data handling models accommodate diverse product attributes. It is also applied in applications requiring rapid scaling and minimal database management, such as IoT systems, enabling reliable data storage and accessibility.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Claris FileMaker is a versatile platform designed for creating custom applications that integrate seamlessly with existing systems. Known for its adaptability, it enables users to develop tailored solutions efficiently, addressing varied business processes.

FileMaker offers a robust suite of tools for professional developers and non-technical users alike, allowing quick application creation and deployment. It supports cross-platform access, making it an excellent choice for businesses needing flexible solutions without deep technical involvement. Its intuitive design supports automation, extensive integration capabilities, and secure data management to enhance business workflows comprehensively.

What key features does Claris FileMaker offer?

Cross-platform Access: Ensure applications work seamlessly on Windows, Mac, iOS, and web browsers.
Integration APIs: Connect with other apps effortlessly through RESTful APIs.
Data Management: Store and manage data efficiently with built-in security measures.
Customizable Templates: Start projects faster with pre-designed templates that can be modified.
Automation Tools: Automate routine tasks to increase efficiency.

What benefits should users look for in Claris FileMaker?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamline operations by automating and customizing workflows.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduce the need for multiple tools by consolidating tasks in one platform.
Scalability: Adapt solutions as business requirements grow or change.
User Empowerment: Enable both developers and end-users to contribute to application building without extensive coding knowledge.

Industries like retail, healthcare, and education leverage Claris FileMaker for tailored applications and workflow automation, addressing specific workplace challenges such as inventory management, patient data handling, and educational resource distribution. Its customizable nature allows these sectors to optimize their operations effectively.

Apple

Sample Customers

Livemocha

VUHL, Reynolds Services Inc., Market Refrigeration Specialists, Sea Breeze Farm, Jordan Lindblad, Henry Schein Dental

Buyer's Guide

Non-Relational Databases

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxData, Oracle, Apple and others in Non-Relational Databases. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.