MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Amazon SQS compete in the enterprise integration and messaging service sectors. MuleSoft tends to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive integration features, while Amazon SQS excels with its message queuing capabilities suitable for AWS-centric environments.
Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides a complete suite for API management and integration, including an iPaaS and on-premise ESB. Its robust API management capabilities and extensive connectors offer high performance and flexibility. Amazon SQS focuses on powerful message queuing, featuring FIFO capabilities and seamless AWS integration, supporting high message throughput and reliable message delivery.
Room for Improvement: MuleSoft could improve its documentation, support responsiveness, and flexibility in tooling. Its high cost and complex licensing are also areas of concern. Amazon SQS could enhance message visibility and support for data bursts, improving transaction handling and monitoring. A better cost calculator and integration with non-AWS systems would be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers deployment across various cloud options and on-premises environments, with customer service experiences varying. Amazon SQS prioritizes public cloud deployment for streamlined setup, with responsive customer service, though support formats differ, prompting some users to seek AWS resources or third-party communities.
Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is noted for its high cost and complex licensing but delivers significant ROI through its feature-rich and API-led approach, reducing maintenance costs and technical debt. Amazon SQS provides scalable pricing with a pay-as-you-go model, where initial costs are affordable. Pricing may rise with usage, yet the ROI remains positive due to its reliable message queuing, especially in AWS environments.
Using Amazon SQS has led to increased productivity and reduced man-hour costs.
They meet their tasks effectively.
The support team is responsive and helpful.
The Salesforce team offers different levels of support.
Amazon SQS is highly scalable, automatically managing itself based on the load.
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is quite scalable, and it meets our use cases with no issues preventing implementation.
MuleSoft provides the ability to scale, yet it is costly to do so.
With Amazon SQS, such maintenance is not needed, making it more reliable and secure.
It would be beneficial if there was a provision to configure and retain messages for longer than a week.
MuleSoft is considered expensive, so pricing is a major concern.
Currently, it uses other standards, but adopting OpenAPI, the standard in the market, would be beneficial.
When dealing with multiple transactions or trading, the system can lose control, and tracking becomes hectic.
On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, I would rate the pricing as one.
I do not know the specific costs, but given that it is part of MuleSoft, I suspect it is not cheap.
MuleSoft is considered one of the more expensive products in the market.
The platform reduces manual workload in maintaining infrastructure, but it does come with some cost considerations.
If there's a failure in the system after consuming a message, SQS's settings ensure the message is not deleted until confirmation.
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform helps to standardize data integration approaches, making it easier to implement integration projects.
The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API.
The platform is integrated with Salesforce, making it preferable when using Salesforce products.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon SQS | 7.8% |
| MuleSoft Anypoint Platform | 8.6% |
| Other | 83.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. Using SQS, you can send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available. Get started with SQS in minutes using the AWS console, Command Line Interface or SDK of your choice, and three simple commands.
SQS offers two types of message queues. Standard queues offer maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery. SQS FIFO queues are designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent.
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides API management and integration capabilities with scalability, ensuring seamless connectivity across systems.
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers API management and integration capabilities within a user-friendly interface. With a range of connectors and the ability to handle integration patterns, it enables data integration across environments with support for API-led connectivity. High scalability, observability, batch processing, and tooling are key features, enhancing performance while simplifying deployment.
What are the standout features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is employed by organizations for API management and seamless integration across systems in industries like retail and e-commerce. It connects enterprise applications in environments such as SAP and Salesforce. Users leverage it for data transformation and synchronization, achieving efficient real-time processing and a middleware layer across systems.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
