

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Anaplan are leading products in the ERP and cloud-based planning categories, respectively. JD Edwards appears to hold an edge in customization and integration capabilities, while Anaplan stands out with its ease of use and data integration features.
Features: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers comprehensive ERP capabilities including robust warehouse and inventory management. Its strong customization allows extensive user configuration and smooth integration with legacy systems. Anaplan's cloud-based platform excels in model building and data visualization. Its user-friendly interface and no-coding requirement simplify complex environments, enhancing real-time data integration and collaboration.
Room for Improvement: JD Edwards could benefit from improved cloud integration and more intuitive workflows. Enhancements in reporting tools and industry-specific modules, along with more user training, would boost its usability. Anaplan needs to better integrate its visualization capabilities. Addressing complexity in use and pricing, along with improved machine learning and forecasting functions, are key areas for growth.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JD Edwards offers versatile deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid cloud solutions, generally backed by favorable technical support. However, self-service troubleshooting remains a user concern. Anaplan emphasizes cloud deployment with both public and private cloud options. It is recognized for a straightforward deployment and strong initial support, though ongoing issues may require user persistence.
Pricing and ROI: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive with a complex licensing system, yet provides substantial ROI, particularly for larger enterprises. High maintenance costs are offset by long-term investment benefits. Anaplan's pricing, influenced by premium features and storage requirements, remains competitive and value-for-money when well-aligned with business needs, offering good ROI through agile data management and collaboration capabilities.
Previously, there was significant development for customizations, but with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, the necessary reports are readily available, reducing maintenance costs.
The technical support from Anaplan is amazing, with a dedicated team to assist in case of any issues.
We are getting the kind of support that we need from Anaplan.
They act quickly, and the partners stay up-to-date with the latest innovations.
Their support is expensive, and I don't think you're getting your bang for your buck.
The technical support is a strong point, and I would rate it an eight on a scale of one to ten.
Anaplan had issues before, but the new Polaris engine solves them.
It is suitable for any business size, from retail to manufacturing, and can grow with any business.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is very stable.
I rate the stability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne as a seven out of ten.
If any kind of history can be captured on the front-end UX page, that would be really appreciated and helpful.
Anaplan cannot perform some tasks handled by Planning Analytics due to their different foundations, Anaplan on Hyperblock technology and TM1 on OLAP.
One improvement that could be added to Anaplan is to stabilize the models when data complexity increases, allowing us to manage our time and space well.
JD Edwards should consider implementing more user-friendly interfaces and downloads to aid end users.
There is room for improvement on the payroll side, as the solution is not very strong in this area.
I would like to see improvements in the analytical part of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, specifically in the business intelligence aspect, to enhance its capabilities compared to bespoke solutions.
Currently, Anaplan is more expensive compared to other tools.
The pricing is slightly on the premium side, but I do not have detailed knowledge about the exact licensing structure.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive compared to newer applications.
Initially, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne was priced very high, and the licensing is very expensive.
Anaplan's connected planning feature is its most valuable aspect, allowing for seamless financial planning, HR planning, and updates.
The integration is very seamless compared to any other tools in the market, making Anaplan quite easy to integrate with different tools.
I like about Anaplan the simplicity and the way it makes reporting easier and planning is broken down well.
The integration between plant maintenance, stores, and financials is highly valued by my customers in the refinery business, as it allows for efficient maintenance processes and easily accessible financial information.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne manages multiple manufacturing modes in the same process effectively.
The multi-currency feature affects our global operations and helped us implement it across South Africa, Japan, Portugal, and South Korea.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| JD Edwards EnterpriseOne | 12.7% |
| Anaplan | 5.3% |
| Other | 82.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
Anaplan delivers a comprehensive cloud platform designed for three-dimensional data analysis, visualization, and planning. Known for real-time integration with systems such as Salesforce, it enables efficient budgeting, reporting, and modeling without extensive coding knowledge.
The Anaplan platform enhances operational efficiency with its flexible and scalable capabilities, supporting financial planning, supply chain management, and sales operations among others. Users benefit from features like an advanced in-memory calculation engine, quick updates, and ease of integration with systems like SAP. While Anaplan offers a robust toolset, enhancements in dashboard capabilities and integration processes are needed, with improvements requested in visualization tools, more flexible graphs, and better API integration. Additional desires include machine learning features and streamlined data import processes to reduce latency.
What are the key features of Anaplan?In industries like financial planning, supply chain management, and sales operations, Anaplan facilitates scenario-based analysis, demand forecasting, and business execution. It is employed in marketing, commercial real estate planning, and integrates easily with existing systems. Users in these sectors find it valuable for improving planning accuracy and responsiveness.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne provides an adaptable ERP platform with integrated modules, allowing users to meet diverse business needs effectively. Its strengths in flexibility, customization, and ease of use make it ideal for global operations across multiple platforms and currencies.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a comprehensive ERP platform supporting financial management, inventory control, and manufacturing processes. Users benefit from a user-friendly interface, real-time data access, and scalable architecture, which enhances workflow efficiency. The software's multi-language support and seamless setup accommodate global operations. Programming flexibility allows for easy customizations, while orchestration and business intelligence features enrich analytics capabilities. Areas for improvement include customization options, reporting flexibility, and supporting industry-specific features. Enhancements in automation, cloud adaptation, and pricing strategies are recommended. Training materials, deployment ease, integration capabilities, and support for international localization require attention. Analytics and dashboard functionalities could be more intuitive, and updates should align with industry requirements.
What are the key features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is widely used in sectors such as manufacturing, trade, and distribution, often in financial management roles including accounting, budgeting, and procurement. It supports both on-premise and cloud deployments, integrating with existing systems for enhanced processes like capital asset management and operational functions through automation tools like Orchestrator.
We monitor all Production Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.