Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo

Top 10 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Alternatives

Vendor: Oracle
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
2,778 followers
Start review

Top JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne surpasses its competitors by offering robust scalability, seamless integration, and comprehensive industry solutions, empowering businesses with flexible deployment options and personalized user experiences that drive operational efficiency and adapt to evolving market demands.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
SAP ERP
4.0 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
SAP ERP
4.0 out of 5
SAP ERP offers comprehensive enterprise integration with customizable industry options, ideal for large organizations. In comparison, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is adaptable, featuring robust supply chain management with a focus on cost-effectiveness, making it appealing for medium to large enterprises seeking flexibility.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP ERP Report
SAP ERP has a lower setup cost compared to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, highlighting a more budget-friendly initial investment. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, however, justifies a higher setup expenditure with advanced features and robust scalability tailored for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP ERP has a lower setup cost compared to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, highlighting a more budget-friendly initial investment. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, however, justifies a higher setup expenditure with advanced features and robust scalability tailored for larger enterprises.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
SAP S/4HANA
4.2 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
SAP S/4HANA
4.2 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne provides attractive pricing and reasonable licensing costs suitable for large enterprises. In comparison, SAP S/4HANA, with its extensive features, serves large companies needing robust ERP solutions, despite its complexity and higher expense.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP S/4HANA Report
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers lower setup costs compared to the more extensive setup expenses of SAP S/4HANA, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two enterprise solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers lower setup costs compared to the more extensive setup expenses of SAP S/4HANA, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two enterprise solutions.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central excels in integrating with Office 365 and offers customization for small to medium businesses. In comparison, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ideal for larger enterprises with strong supply chain capabilities and extensive customization.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Report
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central offers lower setup costs compared to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, making it the more economical choice for businesses focused on initial expenses. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne may require more investment initially, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central offers lower setup costs compared to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, making it the more economical choice for businesses focused on initial expenses. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne may require more investment initially, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Microsoft Dynamics AX
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Dynamics AX offers flexibility and integration with Microsoft products, ideal for manufacturing, despite its customization demands. In comparison, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne covers diverse functionalities with user-friendly tools, suitable for extensive business needs, though modernization and clearer licensing could improve its appeal.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX Report
Microsoft Dynamics AX is known for its relatively high setup costs, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne typically presents lower initial expenses, highlighting a cost-effective alternative for businesses seeking ERP solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics AX is known for its relatively high setup costs, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne typically presents lower initial expenses, highlighting a cost-effective alternative for businesses seeking ERP solutions.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
SAP Business One
4.0 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
SAP Business One
4.0 out of 5
SAP Business One excels in financial management with multi-currency capabilities ideal for markets like Turkey. In comparison, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers strong supply chain management, appealing to industries needing customization. SAP Business One is more budget-friendly; however, JD Edwards prioritizes operational scalability for larger enterprises.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP Business One Report
SAP Business One features a lower setup cost compared to the more expensive setup cost of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, highlighting a clear cost disparity between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Business One features a lower setup cost compared to the more expensive setup cost of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, highlighting a clear cost disparity between the two solutions.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Infor LN
4.1 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Infor LN
4.1 out of 5
Infor LN is ideal for manufacturing and global operations due to comprehensive modules and multisite functionality. In comparison, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is preferred for extensive module integration and adaptability across industries, offering ease of customization and strong financial management for diverse business needs.
Download Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report
Infor LN features a complex setup that may require additional time and resources, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne generally offers a more streamlined and budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Infor LN features a complex setup that may require additional time and resources, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne generally offers a more streamlined and budget-friendly initial setup.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
IFS Cloud Platform
3.9 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
IFS Cloud Platform
3.9 out of 5
IFS Cloud Platform offers flexible customization and strong asset maintenance capabilities with competitive pricing for medium to large enterprises. In comparison, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne excels in production modeling and configurability, offering cost-effective solutions for large enterprises with a focus on robust finance and supply chain modules.
Download IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report
IFS Cloud Platform offers a more predictable setup cost, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne involves higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
IFS Cloud Platform offers a more predictable setup cost, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne involves higher initial expenses.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Infor M3
4.1 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Infor M3
4.1 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports business growth with integrated ERP and robust supply chain models, ensuring flexibility and comprehensive tools. In comparison, Infor M3 specializes in detailed manufacturing with strong integration, leveraging cloud technology for flexible planning. JD Edwards is complex, while Infor M3 offers cost-effectiveness.
Download Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's setup cost is higher compared to Infor M3, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's setup cost is higher compared to Infor M3, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Epicor ERP
3.9 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Epicor ERP
3.9 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers comprehensive ERP integration, emphasizing ease of maintenance and customization for varied processes. In comparison, Epicor ERP provides flexible dashboards and efficient production planning with user forums. JD Edwards' module range contrasts with Epicor's initial cost competitiveness and licensing flexibility.
Download Epicor ERP vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reports higher setup costs, whereas Epicor ERP offers a more economical initial investment. This significant cost difference may impact budget-conscious businesses evaluating ERP solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reports higher setup costs, whereas Epicor ERP offers a more economical initial investment. This significant cost difference may impact budget-conscious businesses evaluating ERP solutions.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Infor CloudSuite
4.0 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Infor CloudSuite
4.0 out of 5
Infor CloudSuite excels in flexible integrations and industry-specific capabilities, ideal for businesses prioritizing straightforward cloud deployment. In comparison, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's robust feature set appeals to those seeking comprehensive solutions like financial management despite increased initial investment and complex deployment.
Download Infor CloudSuite vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report
Infor CloudSuite involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its rich feature set, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a more cost-effective setup, catering to businesses with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Infor CloudSuite involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its rich feature set, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a more cost-effective setup, catering to businesses with budget constraints.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
NetSuite OneWorld
4.2 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
NetSuite OneWorld
4.2 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne excels in customizable ERP solutions for large enterprises, especially in manufacturing and inventory management. In comparison, NetSuite OneWorld efficiently manages multiple business functions for small to medium-sized businesses, offering benefits in multicurrency transactions and global operations.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. NetSuite OneWorld Report
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a higher setup cost, offering comprehensive ERP features, whereas NetSuite OneWorld has a lower setup cost, providing a cloud-based solution.
View comparison
Pricing
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a higher setup cost, offering comprehensive ERP features, whereas NetSuite OneWorld has a lower setup cost, providing a cloud-based solution.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Dynamics GP excels in financial management and seamless integration with Microsoft services, making it ideal for small-to-midsize enterprises seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's deep industry-specific features and customization options are suited for large enterprises requiring extensive solutions.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report
Microsoft Dynamics GP generally involves lower initial setup costs, making it a more budget-friendly option for small to mid-sized businesses, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne often requires a higher upfront investment, appealing to larger enterprises seeking comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GP generally involves lower initial setup costs, making it a more budget-friendly option for small to mid-sized businesses, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne often requires a higher upfront investment, appealing to larger enterprises seeking comprehensive features.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Pronto Xi
1 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Pronto Xi
1 out of 5

With Pronto Xi Wholesale Ready, you get a complete enterprise ERP and Business Intelligence solution to run all aspects of your business. It is a fully integrated solution with deep functionality and process automation.

View comparison
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
IQMS Enterprise IQ
4.0 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
IQMS Enterprise IQ
4.0 out of 5
IQMS provides manufacturers with a reliable, real-time Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software developed especially for manufacturing processes. Whether you are a small, single plant manufacturer or a large multi-plant, global manufacturer, IQMS has a manufacturing-specific ERP solution to fit your needs.Due to the comprehensive nature of the system, the EnterpriseIQ ERP Software solution becomes the backbone for manufacturers to monitor, track, trace and communicate business and manufacturing activities and data throughout the supply chain faster than any other software on the market today. The scalable, modular architecture of EnterpriseIQ provides manufacturers the flexibility to take advantage of more advanced ERP software and manufacturing software features and functionality when needed.
View comparison
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
QAD Cloud ERP
3.5 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
QAD Cloud ERP
3.5 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers robust customization for large enterprises with advanced features, while QAD Cloud ERP provides easier integration for smaller firms. In comparison, QAD Cloud ERP’s cloud deployment is rapid and cost-efficient, appealing to businesses seeking agility and scalability.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. QAD Cloud ERP Report
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne typically has a higher setup cost, while QAD Cloud ERP offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne typically has a higher setup cost, while QAD Cloud ERP offers a more affordable initial investment.
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Logo
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Dynamics SL excels in affordable project management, ideal for project-centric businesses seeking swift deployment. In comparison, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers extensive features for large enterprises, delivering comprehensive functionality and a higher long-term ROI through sophisticated capabilities in complex operational environments.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL Report
Microsoft Dynamics SL typically has a lower setup cost compared to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, which may have a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics SL typically has a lower setup cost compared to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, which may have a higher initial investment.

Related categories

ERP
Activity Based Costing Software
Production Planning