Infor M3 vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

Infor and Oracle are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7, while Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. Infor holds a 3.2% mindshare in ERP, compared to Oracle’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infor M3

Read 15 Infor M3 reviews

3,057 Views
2,935 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Read 63 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reviews

2,899 Views
2,203 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Infor M3

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Infor M3 are competing in the ERP software category. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a slight advantage in integration and customization capabilities, while Infor M3 excels in industry-specific solutions and integration with third-party applications.

Features: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers comprehensive modules with full integration, a robust supply chain model, and customization capabilities through E1 tools. Infor M3 provides strong management for supply chains, production, and customer orders, emphasizing micro-vertical solutions and rapid deployment features.

Room for Improvement: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could enhance specialized industry features, simplify its interface, and improve reporting tools. Infor M3 could improve out-of-box reports, streamline integration with planning tools, and address customization complexities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment but has a complex setup process. Its technical support is responsive, though concerns exist about Oracle's on-premise focus. Infor M3 offers public cloud options with reliable technical support, focusing on efficient ticket resolution.

Pricing and ROI: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is expensive, especially for extensive licenses, but offers good ROI through stability. Infor M3's pricing is high but seen as more affordable compared to tier-one solutions, delivering good ROI with effective integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

11th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Ranking in ERP

9th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Production Planning (1st), Demand Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor M3 is 3.2%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 2.4%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne	2.4%
Infor M3	3.2%
Other	94.4%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Umesh D

Vice President, Delivery at Independent Computer Consulting Group, Incorporated

Maximized industry-specific process efficiency with rapid implementation

The best features of Infor M3 are the micro-vertical and industry ready-made solutions rather than generic solutions. They have ready-made solutions ready, so the implementation of the process discovery happens very fast. It won't take more than two months, and if the process is very simple and they adopt the standard, it may happen within five weeks, covering the implementation cycle which will finish within seven to eight months. Most of the time, it helps streamline business processes; maybe some processes such as unique subcontracting vary by continent or job work, which could be different due to legal compliance. Other than that, everything helps because the processes are very much streamlined. Everywhere you have a check and maker concept, there is a workflow, and all those things are there; document management is also very simple. You can drag and drop the reports. The workflow feature is very good and flexible, working with multi-level authorization and all those capabilities. Apart from that, the GUI interface screens are really good. Users can design their own workspace based on the roles, and there are roles-based security options, with many roles available that you need not define—you can just tweak them.

Read full review

Euan Ellis

Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported global operations through multi-currency and modular customization

Oracle's support is not that good for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Their support is expensive, and I don't think you're getting your bang for your buck. For the cloud product, they do give you support, but everything is online and you might not get somebody. I would give Oracle's support for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne about a 6.5 on a scale of one to 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"Overall, I rate Infor M3 nine out of ten for a positive experience."

"The user interface and user experience were good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is highly customizable."

"M3 has several useful features for managing supply chains, production, and customer orders. It's an excellent system that helps me meet all my requirements for fixed costs."

"It's simple to use. You don't need any complex training to use it."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to cover different types of activities, and the requirement for maintenance and data is very low."

"Infor comes up with different tools every year, and they are all compatible with Infor M3, which makes it a more reliable and trustworthy tool. The integration is very smooth."

More Infor M3 pros

"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."

"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."

"Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten, as it can be customized to the company's needs while maintaining best practices."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a user-friendly ERP solution that is quite simple."

"EnterpriseOne is stable and can be customized according to customer requirements."

"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is very scalable. It is suitable for any business size, from retail to manufacturing, and can grow with any business."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pros

Cons

"The solution must provide more learning documents."

"Here in Infor M3, you have certain limitations where the main components cannot be modified—you must work around or use bolt-ons."

"Improvements could be made in security and scalability."

"It would be great if Infor added some new workflows in the finance module. I'd also like to see better integration with third-party applications."

"An area for improvement in Infor M3 is training. There should be more training resources available for clients. Clients also find it challenging to get consultants or integrators for Infor M3. The product doesn't have enough resources in the market to help clients."

"The solution is stable but not agile."

"The solution's technical support is an area with shortcomings that need improvement, especially the support for the product named M3 rather than the support offered by Infor as an organization."

"The product's technical support has certain shortcomings. Sometimes, my company doesn't get a proper response from their end."

More Infor M3 cons

"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."

"Localization features are critical for all regions. Improving these features in various countries and markets is essential to meet customer needs."

"There is room for improvement on the payroll side, as the solution is not very strong in this area."

"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."

"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."

"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."

"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."

"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

"More transparent pricing of the software is needed."

"It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%."

"The pricing is an "arm-and-a-leg". This keeps the customers away from going for J.D. Edwards."

"The solution is really expensive."

"The price of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is high. However, every ERP solution has a high price."

"The cost depends on the number of users and the modules required."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"In terms of pricing, we have a lot of problems because companies here don't have enough resources to acquire the product. So we need to evaluate the price according to our demographic...The license cost is around 1,00,000 euros."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Infor M3?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

Some customers expect more out-of-box reports, and in some areas, they should provide more reports. However, Infor has introduced a report tool so that key users or global champions can generate re...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

Infor M3 is specifically dominant in fashion, food and beverages, and chemicals manufacturing; it works into micro-verticals. In food and beverage, it specializes in meat processing, confectionery,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

Initially, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne was priced very high, and the licensing is very expensive. I think Oracle has revised those prices. Competition has perhaps forced them to revise those pricing b...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

I have experience with similar solutions and also this product, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. I haven't worked with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for the last 18 months, but I still know the product. I am f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's analytics are not that helpful. People generally attach other analytic solutions to it. This is something that JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve on.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 32% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 17% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 10% of the time

Infor Distribution SX.e vs Infor M3

Compared 5% of the time

NetSuite ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 2% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

Oracle E-Business Suite vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 11% of the time

SAP ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 8% of the time

JD Edwards World vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 6% of the time

PeopleSoft vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 5% of the time

NetSuite ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 5% of the time

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

January 2026

Download Infor M3 product report

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

January 2026

Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne product report

Also Known As

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

No data available

Overview

Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

Infor

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) software solution developed by Oracle. It is designed to help organizations streamline and automate their business processes, including financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing operations. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, distribution, and services.

With JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, organizations can manage their financials, inventory, order management, procurement, and supply chain processes from a single, integrated platform. It also provides real-time visibility into business performance, enabling organizations to make informed decisions and respond quickly to changing market conditions.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Features

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Financial management: The solution provides tools for financial management, including general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, and fixed assets.

Supply chain management: Its tools for managing the supply chain include procurement, inventory management, and order management.

Manufacturing operations: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports manufacturing operations, including material requirements planning (MRP), capacity planning, and shop floor control.

Real-time visibility: With its real-time visibility into business performance, organizations can make more informed decisions.

Business intelligence: The solution offers business intelligence and reporting capabilities to help organizations gain insight into their operations and make data-driven decisions.

Workflow management: The solution’s workflow management enables organizations to automate and streamline business processes.

Mobile access: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne allows users to access information and perform tasks from anywhere, at any time via mobile access.

Security: It provides a secure platform for protecting sensitive data and ensuring the integrity of business operations.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Increased productivity: With its range of tools and features, the solution supports collaboration and communication, improving productivity and reducing the time required to complete tasks.

Improved business performance: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne helps organizations improve their overall business performance by providing real-time visibility into key performance metrics and enabling data-driven decision-making.

Customization: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries and organizations.

Integration: It integrates with other enterprise applications, including customer relationship management (CRM), human resources (HR), and e-commerce solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are its ability to model, ease of use, customization capabilities, and being able to create reports without coding.

According to PeerSpot user Raymond R., JD Edwards functional consultant manufacturer at Ordina, “The strongest functionality of JD Edwards is the ability to model, in the production that it is, model the production process. If I were to model the bill of materials and production routing, then that's one of the strongest parts of JD Edwards.”

Khalid J., Senior Manager - Group ICT at Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill Co. B. S. C., says, "We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."

In addition, a Project Leader at a tech services company expresses, "With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."

Oracle

Sample Customers

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

February 2026

Free Report: Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.

See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.