No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Halliburton Aries Petroleum...
Ranking in Production Planning
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Ranking in Production Planning
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
ERP (7th), Activity Based Costing Software (3rd), Demand Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Production Planning category, the mindshare of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software is 14.1%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 14.0%, up from 12.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Production Planning Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne14.0%
Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software14.1%
Other71.9%
Production Planning
 

Featured Reviews

Jacobo Ortiz Avila - PeerSpot reviewer
Production Engineer at Parex Resources Inc
Has supported data integration across teams but lacks advanced analytics features
I'm not quite sure how they have helped us actually because I know about the platform, but I haven't used it as I did in the past as a production engineer. I am familiar with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software's decline curve analysis. It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve. If it is only a linear regression that you could get from the data, that would be a mistake. If you could adjust the parameters according to the engineering criteria, that would be interesting. But if it's an inferred value for the parameters, that gives you a scenario where you lose control, and you stop trusting the decline curve. Python is important because you could take out outliers from your data and describe properly the function that could describe your trend. It is necessary to have engineering capability to properly forecast. My experience with the pricing of this product limits us regarding the amount of licenses we could get, so it's challenging. The integration with other software helps us; we integrate with the platform through SQL, but it's the only connection we have experienced.
Euan Ellis - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has supported global operations through multi-currency and modular customization
Oracle's support is not that good for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Their support is expensive, and I don't think you're getting your bang for your buck. For the cloud product, they do give you support, but everything is online and you might not get somebody. I would give Oracle's support for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne about a 6.5 on a scale of one to 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For running economics, planning budgets, and reporting reserves, Aries is one of the best in the industry and used more than any other product in the industry for that purpose."
"The best features of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software are that they attempt to integrate everything coming from the field; every data point that we could get from the field creates a database not only from production but also the mechanical status the wells have."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"Maximizes the investment via industry focus, flexible personalization, configuration, product scalability, and mobile options."
"It’s a good ERP system that gives users ease-of-use, the flexibility to integrate with other systems, and the ability to meet most of the KPIs."
"Proven Warehouse management software available now from Oracle."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"JD Edwards is highly scalable and suitable for both small teams and large enterprises with hundreds of users."
"It can be scalable to any extent, with no issues and no boundaries, and it can serve small, medium, and large enterprises at the same time."
"The features are very convenient to use, and whenever there are custom applications to be added, it's very seamless."
 

Cons

"For decline curve analysis, it could be more user friendly but once you understand how to customize it and tweak projections, it’s easy enough to use."
"It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve."
"My concern is that it's not keeping pace with what's happening in the real world."
"The product’s pricing should be improved."
"The solution could be easier to implement."
"If it's complex, or there's some debate on whether the item is a bug or functioning as designed, it does take quite some time to get through that, and from a customer perspective, sometimes you have to be pretty persistent."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"While it is easy to handle, there is room for improvement compared to more sophisticated ERP systems."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a lot of value for the money. The implementation cost and license cost are quite reasonable compared to other solutions, such as Oracle EBS or SAP."
"The cost depends on the number of users and the modules required."
"The solution is really expensive."
"The maintenance of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is expensive and overall the solution is expensive. Most enterprise operation solution is expensive."
"EnterpriseOne is cost-effective for large enterprises."
"The solution’s pricing depends on the module you’re purchasing."
"In terms of pricing, we have a lot of problems because companies here don't have enough resources to acquire the product. So we need to evaluate the price according to our demographic...The license cost is around 1,00,000 euros."
"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Production Planning solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
33%
University
7%
Government
7%
Legal Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Construction Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise32
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software?
I'm not quite sure how they have helped us actually because I know about the platform, but I haven't used it as I did in the past as a production engineer. I am familiar with Halliburton Aries Petr...
What is your primary use case for Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software?
This software is for production planning. It gathers production data from the field, which is my main use case.
What advice do you have for others considering Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software?
We are working with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software, and I can provide a review regarding different reporting tools or monitoring tools. I would give them a rating of seven out of ten...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
Initially, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne was priced very high, and the licensing is very expensive. I think Oracle has revised those prices. Competition has perhaps forced them to revise those pricing b...
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
I have experience with similar solutions and also this product, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. I haven't worked with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for the last 18 months, but I still know the product. I am f...
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's analytics are not that helpful. People generally attach other analytic solutions to it. This is something that JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve on.
 

Also Known As

Aries Petroleum Economic Software
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

StimWatch Stimulation Monitoring Service
TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
Find out what your peers are saying about Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.