Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Halliburton Aries Petroleum...
Ranking in Production Planning
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Ranking in Production Planning
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
ERP (10th), Activity Based Costing Software (5th), Demand Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Production Planning category, the mindshare of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software is 8.8%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 14.4%, up from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Production Planning Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne14.4%
Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software8.8%
Other76.8%
Production Planning
 

Featured Reviews

Jacobo Ortiz Avila - PeerSpot reviewer
Has supported data integration across teams but lacks advanced analytics features
I'm not quite sure how they have helped us actually because I know about the platform, but I haven't used it as I did in the past as a production engineer. I am familiar with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software's decline curve analysis. It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve. If it is only a linear regression that you could get from the data, that would be a mistake. If you could adjust the parameters according to the engineering criteria, that would be interesting. But if it's an inferred value for the parameters, that gives you a scenario where you lose control, and you stop trusting the decline curve. Python is important because you could take out outliers from your data and describe properly the function that could describe your trend. It is necessary to have engineering capability to properly forecast. My experience with the pricing of this product limits us regarding the amount of licenses we could get, so it's challenging. The integration with other software helps us; we integrate with the platform through SQL, but it's the only connection we have experienced.
Eric Oboh - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables efficient finance and maintenance management with real-time data and strong integration
The integration between plant maintenance, stores, and financials is highly valued by my customers in the refinery business, as it allows for efficient maintenance processes and easily accessible financial information. Additionally, the mobile features are beneficial as they allow managers to approve or reject orders on the go. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne provides real-time data, which is very timely for decision-making. Managers have dashboards created for them that are readily updated for insightful information. This reflects the improved business intelligence features of the solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best features of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software are that they attempt to integrate everything coming from the field; every data point that we could get from the field creates a database not only from production but also the mechanical status the wells have."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The product can scale."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
 

Cons

"It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"Implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne can have its challenges. For example, we faced issues like timeout exceptions in a recent integration project while pulling data from third-party systems."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"While it is easy to handle, there is room for improvement compared to more sophisticated ERP systems."
"There is room for improvement on the payroll side, as the solution is not very strong in this area."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is very high. Even though the license is perpetual yet you have to get the maintenance. Since we pay using Pesos, it's very expensive."
"The maintenance of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is expensive and overall the solution is expensive. Most enterprise operation solution is expensive."
"In terms of price, it is not on the high end."
"It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%."
"There is an annual license for this solution."
"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."
"It's very competitively priced. The only problem now is that most of the industry is moving towards software as a service or a subscription model, whereas JD Edwards has a capital expenditure. You would spend on the licenses once off. You can either host it on-premise or in the cloud, but there is a licensing fee once a year."
"The price of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is high. However, every ERP solution has a high price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Production Planning solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
33%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Construction Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise31
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive compared to newer applications, and consultancy costs are on the high side.
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
I perform complex setups and use flex accounting in different ways. We have both simple projects with basic configurations and complex projects. It depends on the projects. We understand the busine...
 

Also Known As

Aries Petroleum Economic Software
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

StimWatch Stimulation Monitoring Service
TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,