Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software vs Siemens Tecnomatix Assembly Planning and Validation comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Halliburton Aries Petroleum...
Ranking in Production Planning
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Siemens Tecnomatix Assembly...
Ranking in Production Planning
5th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Production Planning category, the mindshare of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software is 8.7%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Siemens Tecnomatix Assembly Planning and Validation is 30.3%, down from 34.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Production Planning Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Siemens Tecnomatix Assembly Planning and Validation30.3%
Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software8.7%
Other61.0%
Production Planning
 

Featured Reviews

Jacobo Ortiz Avila - PeerSpot reviewer
Has supported data integration across teams but lacks advanced analytics features
I'm not quite sure how they have helped us actually because I know about the platform, but I haven't used it as I did in the past as a production engineer. I am familiar with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software's decline curve analysis. It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve. If it is only a linear regression that you could get from the data, that would be a mistake. If you could adjust the parameters according to the engineering criteria, that would be interesting. But if it's an inferred value for the parameters, that gives you a scenario where you lose control, and you stop trusting the decline curve. Python is important because you could take out outliers from your data and describe properly the function that could describe your trend. It is necessary to have engineering capability to properly forecast. My experience with the pricing of this product limits us regarding the amount of licenses we could get, so it's challenging. The integration with other software helps us; we integrate with the platform through SQL, but it's the only connection we have experienced.
Use Siemens Tecnomatix Assembly Planning and Validation?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Production Planning solutions are best for your needs.
867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
34%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Construction Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
26%
University
10%
Educational Organization
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Aries Petroleum Economic Software
Tecnomatix Assembly Planning and Validation
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

StimWatch Stimulation Monitoring Service
Dalian Auto, LoeschPack, John Deere, Cosma Assembly Technology, WEST-RU, Maruti Suzuki, Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering, KAMAZ, VP Automation