Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aspen Unified PIMS vs Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aspen Unified PIMS
Ranking in Production Planning
8th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Halliburton Aries Petroleum...
Ranking in Production Planning
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Production Planning category, the mindshare of Aspen Unified PIMS is 4.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software is 8.8%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Production Planning Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software8.8%
Aspen Unified PIMS4.6%
Other86.6%
Production Planning
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aspen Unified PIMS?
Share your opinion
Jacobo Ortiz Avila - PeerSpot reviewer
Has supported data integration across teams but lacks advanced analytics features
I'm not quite sure how they have helped us actually because I know about the platform, but I haven't used it as I did in the past as a production engineer. I am familiar with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software's decline curve analysis. It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve. If it is only a linear regression that you could get from the data, that would be a mistake. If you could adjust the parameters according to the engineering criteria, that would be interesting. But if it's an inferred value for the parameters, that gives you a scenario where you lose control, and you stop trusting the decline curve. Python is important because you could take out outliers from your data and describe properly the function that could describe your trend. It is necessary to have engineering capability to properly forecast. My experience with the pricing of this product limits us regarding the amount of licenses we could get, so it's challenging. The integration with other software helps us; we integrate with the platform through SQL, but it's the only connection we have experienced.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Production Planning solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Energy/Utilities Company
33%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Aspen Technology PIMS, PIMS
Aries Petroleum Economic Software
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Westlake Chemical
StimWatch Stimulation Monitoring Service