Infor LX vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Infor and Oracle are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6. Infor holds a 1.4% mindshare in ERP, compared to Oracle’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infor LX

Read 9 Infor LX reviews

2,599 Views
2,495 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Read 63 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reviews

7,463 Views
5,896 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Infor LX

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Infor LX and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne compete in the enterprise resource planning systems category. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive and advanced capabilities, providing greater value.

Features: Infor LX provides strong manufacturing and distribution capabilities ideal for complex manufacturing requirements, interactive planning, and seamless system integration for automation. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers extensive reporting and analytics, superior integration capabilities, scalability, financial and user navigation, and robust customization options.

Room for Improvement: Infor LX could enhance analytics depth, broaden integration scope, and improve scalability. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne might benefit from simpler implementation processes, reduced complexity in use for non-technical users, and lower initial costs for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infor LX offers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support catered to manufacturing sectors. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, although more complex due to its broad scope, excels in providing comprehensive customization options and exceptional service and support.

Pricing and ROI: Infor LX is recognized for its reasonable upfront costs and good ROI within manufacturing settings. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, despite higher initial pricing, provides a significant return on investment through its expansive features and functionality, often leading to higher overall satisfaction.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor LX

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Ranking in ERP

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (3rd), Production Planning (1st), Demand Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LX is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 2.9%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne	2.9%
Infor LX	1.4%
Other	95.7%

ERP

Featured Reviews

HareshSuralia

Senior lead consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Manufacturing planning has become efficient and supports integrated shop floor and quality control

For manufacturing, Infor LX is very strong on the MRP side with MRP and MPS capabilities, and even shop floor functionality. The platform has quality control features, and there are many additional features available. There is also integration with finance. Overall, for manufacturing, it is very good. There are many modules that have been implemented including inbound, outbound, and logistics. Primarily for manufacturing and the processing side, everything is excellent. It's a solid, proven product. Infor LX's material planning feature is quite a flexible solution.

Read full review

Euan Ellis

Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported global operations through multi-currency and modular customization

Oracle's support is not that good for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Their support is expensive, and I don't think you're getting your bang for your buck. For the cloud product, they do give you support, but everything is online and you might not get somebody. I would give Oracle's support for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne about a 6.5 on a scale of one to 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Infor LX has helped us in conducting efficient production planning, streamlining procurement processes, and maintaining a reliable source of information for our vendors and procurement purchase orders."

"I've been using it since December 2009, and it has been absolutely stable till now."

"Infor LX is effective for planning, manufacturing, and distribution processes."

"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."

"This solution has brought structure and shape to our day-to-day operations."

"Mainly for manufacturing and processing, everything is excellent."

"Infor LX's most valuable feature is that it's very interactive."

"The most important feature of Infor LX for me is the use of models for accounting, which create effects in different layers simultaneously."

More Infor LX pros

"When it's boiled down to the ERP system, I would recommend Oracle EOne compared to SAP since you can do lots of customization, and you have lots of other functionalities enabled in the system."

"EnterpriseOne is stable and can be customized according to customer requirements."

"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."

"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."

"But for large enterprises, it's a very good and cost-effective solution that's competitive with other products like SAP."

"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."

"The product can scale."

"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pros

Cons

"The user interface of Infor LX needs significant enhancement to be more user-friendly."

"From a supporting point of view, Infor LX is not quite what I see with SAP and other areas."

"Infor's support side is not that good, and they seem to be focusing on other products above LX."

"The connectors, performance, and knowledgebase availability can be improved."

"Infor needs more APIs, as in the current version, APIs are not fully developed. The development of APIs must be enhanced, especially for AS400."

"The interface needs enhancement, as I am still using outdated screens. I would benefit from a more integrated interface."

"It's based on AS/400 or Power i, a robust technology and platform. However, it is harder to manage admin most of the time."

"It lacks in finance and administration, especially related to Italian accounting."

More Infor LX cons

"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."

"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."

"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."

"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."

"The only issue I see is Oracle's lack of focus on the product. When the sales team calls us, they try to promote OCI more than JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. They don't even talk about it. I feel there's no focus from Oracle Corporation themselves. The salespeople either don't know about it or don't talk about it. When they have something new, they only talk about EBS or OCI. This gives a feeling that there's no interest from Oracle. We don't see much new functionality being released or announced in the roadmap."

"Localization features are critical for all regions. Improving these features in various countries and markets is essential to meet customer needs."

"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."

"Implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne can have its challenges. For example, we faced issues like timeout exceptions in a recent integration project while pulling data from third-party systems."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our last maintenance fee was around $15,000 a year for 33 current users."

"Infor LX is not cheap but much cheaper compared to SAP HANA."

"Pricing is variable due to different deals and discounts, typically starting at around $2000 US dollars for one license."

"The pricing is an "arm-and-a-leg". This keeps the customers away from going for J.D. Edwards."

"EnterpriseOne is cost-effective for large enterprises."

"More transparent pricing of the software is needed."

"There is an annual license for this solution."

"The pricing is very high. Even though the license is perpetual yet you have to get the maintenance. Since we pay using Pesos, it's very expensive."

"In terms of pricing, we have a lot of problems because companies here don't have enough resources to acquire the product. So we need to evaluate the price according to our demographic...The license cost is around 1,00,000 euros."

"The cost depends on the number of users and the modules required."

"The solution's pricing depends on the deal and the number of users."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Infor LX?

For Infor LX itself, the gap for improvement is to add some AI functionality to the product in the future.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor LX?

Infor LX is primarily used for manufacturing. The use case involved transitioning from a previous Wipro project, moving from Pfizer to GSK, with the entire migration occurring within Infor LX. For ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor LX?

Regarding pricing for Infor LX, on a scale where one is a high price and ten is a low price, I would rate it accordingly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

Initially, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne was priced very high, and the licensing is very expensive. I think Oracle has revised those prices. Competition has perhaps forced them to revise those pricing b...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

I have experience with similar solutions and also this product, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. I haven't worked with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for the last 18 months, but I still know the product. I am f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's analytics are not that helpful. People generally attach other analytic solutions to it. This is something that JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve on.

See all answers

Comparisons

Infor LN vs Infor LX

Compared 19% of the time

SAP ERP vs Infor LX

Compared 14% of the time

BizSuite vs Infor LX

Compared 7% of the time

QAD Cloud ERP vs Infor LX

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Infor LX

Compared 5% of the time

More Infor LX Competitors

SAP ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 9% of the time

PeopleSoft vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 6% of the time

JD Edwards World vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 6% of the time

NetSuite ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 4% of the time

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX

October 2026

Download Infor LX product report

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

October 2026

Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne product report

Also Known As

Infor ERP LX, ERP LX

No data available

Overview

Infor LX enhances enterprise-level processes with advanced production and resource planning capabilities, supporting manufacturing and financial management seamlessly.

Infor LX offers robust integration capabilities and automation, allowing for efficient manufacturing and resource management. Its interactive platform ensures seamless connectivity in accounting and finance, while users benefit from its adaptability to diverse requirements. Its ability to manage manufacturing, distribution, and transactions with ease makes it a versatile choice across multiple industries.

What are the key features of Infor LX?

Production Planning: Improves scheduling and resource allocation.
Process Automation: Reduces manual efforts with automated workflows.
ERP Integration: Ensures smooth operations across external systems.
Resource Management: Enhances inventory and material handling.
Financial Management: Integrates accounting and operational processes.

What benefits should users expect?

Efficiency Improvement: Streamlines operations for better productivity.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing business requirements.
Integration Support: Facilitates synergy across departments and applications.
Standardized Processes: Enhances performance consistency.

Infor LX is implemented across industries with a focus on manufacturing, supply chain, and finance operations. It excels in production planning, procurement, and quality control, adapting to remote access needs through Web Talk, and remains competitive in environments transitioning from AS/400 to a cloud-based infrastructure.

Infor

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne provides an adaptable ERP platform with integrated modules, allowing users to meet diverse business needs effectively. Its strengths in flexibility, customization, and ease of use make it ideal for global operations across multiple platforms and currencies.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a comprehensive ERP platform supporting financial management, inventory control, and manufacturing processes. Users benefit from a user-friendly interface, real-time data access, and scalable architecture, which enhances workflow efficiency. The software's multi-language support and seamless setup accommodate global operations. Programming flexibility allows for easy customizations, while orchestration and business intelligence features enrich analytics capabilities. Areas for improvement include customization options, reporting flexibility, and supporting industry-specific features. Enhancements in automation, cloud adaptation, and pricing strategies are recommended. Training materials, deployment ease, integration capabilities, and support for international localization require attention. Analytics and dashboard functionalities could be more intuitive, and updates should align with industry requirements.

What are the key features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

Integrated Modules: Supports financial, inventory, and manufacturing processes for comprehensive ERP functionality.
Multi-platform and Multi-currency Capabilities: Enables seamless global operations across different platforms and currencies.
User-friendly Interface: Ensures easy navigation and efficient use.
Real-time Data Access: Provides up-to-date data for informed decision-making.
Scalable Architecture: Adapts to business growth and changing operational needs.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Improved workflow through integrated processes and real-time access.
Flexibility: Customizable features to meet varied business requirements.
Global Support: Multi-language and multi-currency capabilities enhance international operations.
Business Intelligence: Enhanced decision-making through advanced analytics features.
Operational Integration: Seamless integration with other systems to streamline processes.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is widely used in sectors such as manufacturing, trade, and distribution, often in financial management roles including accounting, budgeting, and procurement. It supports both on-premise and cloud deployments, integrating with existing systems for enhanced processes like capital asset management and operational functions through automation tools like Orchestrator.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Shaklee Corporation, Clover Dairy, Cremer, Group Dekko

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

November 2026

Free Report: Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.