No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ARCON User Behaviour Analytics vs Anomali comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Anomali
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (10th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (11th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (4th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (11th)
ARCON User Behaviour Analytics
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
34th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of Anomali is 3.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ARCON User Behaviour Analytics is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Anomali3.3%
ARCON User Behaviour Analytics0.7%
Other96.0%
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

TarunKumar11 - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Strategic threat intelligence has improved detection speed and consistently reduces analyst workload
Anomali can be improved in various aspects. Its AI-driven automation can further advance, and AI-powered investigation summaries can improve. User experience could be enhanced through simplification of workflows. Better board-level cyber risk dashboards could provide easier visualization. Additionally, Anomali could work on simplifying the pricing structure. Although it excels in threat intelligence aggregation and operationalization, stronger GenAI capability, improved executive reporting, and a more intuitive workflow for analysts would further increase SOC efficiency and add more business value. Regarding Anomali's AI capabilities, governance and security are quite good. Anomali has incorporated AI and machine learning primarily to improve correlation and prioritization. These capabilities are valuable but could be more mature. The platform could achieve better threat correlation, prioritization, more anomaly detection, and allow AI to accelerate intelligence analysis while further improving quality and relevance. The accuracy and reliability of Anomali's AI output are fairly reasonable and good. The AI engine works well, but this capability could be improved. Better threat correlation with threat actors, certain indicators of compromise, malware, and campaigns is possible. Threat prioritization could increase, and alert noise could be reduced through further de-duplication. While reasonable, this is not the best available, and other products possibly have more AI maturity, such as Recorded Future and CrowdStrike Falcon.
PM
Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Great compliance, good session monitoring, and an excellent live dashboard
In the next build, there are still some more points that are going to have to be addressed. There needs to be an application in version three, which is already been done. You can sell it by this month-end in July. They were planning on having application inventory also so that you can have the application inventory and endpoint details along with an easy way of accessing the endpoint. Improvement of user activity needs to happen. We are giving some feedback on how you can do that. That has been done to some extent and improving the elevation logs and all that will help. The solution needs more integration with more of their products. Currently, the agent and is occupying a little bit more resources than necessary. It needs to use up fewer resources in the future. You need to have a certain standard of CPU and memory to maintain this agent. That part we can still have it improved. They can improve a lot of their integrated reporting parameters. Currently, it is all reactive reporting. However, you can have proactive reporting also, which can be included in the future. Currently, they develop most of the devices, including networking and server devices. And yet, there are a lot of other mobile devices, which they're getting familiar with, so hopefully, in the future, they will be more mobile-focused. The solution needs to improve endpoint speed.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) very useful and concise. The solution is easy to use."
"Anomali has impacted my organization positively because our SOC team, which is actively monitoring all the tools—either SIM, SOAR, or threat intelligence platform—operates in multiple shifts."
"The most valuable aspect of Anomali is the threat modeling capability."
"I think it's one of the awesome tools I've worked with to date."
"I have seen a return on investment with Anomali, as it improves analyst investigation time, enhances threat visibility, and supports fast incident responses."
"We now have a very robust collection of threat intelligence based on the capabilities that Anomali provides."
"Anomali positively impacts our organization, notably improving our vulnerability management program under reducing attack surface management."
"Anomali has positively impacted our organization with many improvements since we started using it, as we receive many block hits from them, and we can say that our coverage has been extended to 90% because we do MITRE mapping."
"The solution has product enhancement features that are very useful."
"The compliance is great."
 

Cons

"One more improvement I would mention is regarding compromised credential monitoring. Anomali should increase their capability to fetch details from various dark web solutions where threat actors post compromised credentials."
"While reasonable, this is not the best available, and other products possibly have more AI maturity, such as Recorded Future and CrowdStrike Falcon."
"Anomali can be improved by expanding its capability to capture a broader range of threats because it currently has limitations and may not catch everything occurring in the world, especially from the dark web."
"Anomali Enterprise could improve by combining all the other tools' features into one solution."
"A lot of tools can give you many features, such as CTI intelligence and a tax service reduction. However, many people are combining different tools together to have more capabilities. It is up to the consumer whether they want to have multiple tools or have one tool that serves the purpose. Anomali Enterprise could improve by combining all the other tools' features into one solution."
"Support in the past has been top-notch, but recent trends indicate that it has taken a back seat, as we often don't get answers for days."
"My experience with Anomali's customer support has not gone so well for us."
"Anomali can be improved, specifically the Security Analytics feature, because I feel there is a slight lag in that."
"Currently, the agent is occupying a little bit more resources than necessary."
"The solution needs more integration with more of their products."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When comparing the price of Anomali Enterprise to other solutions it is in the medium to high range. However, I am satisfied with the price."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise14
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anomali Enterprise?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that there are not many follow-ups, but once we interacted with the product team or the leadership of Anomali, they managed a lot with us, a...
What needs improvement with Anomali ThreatStream?
I can mention one point regarding improvements for Anomali, which is more enhanced reporting flexibility. The reporting provided to us is not too detailed and could be more enhanced. Better filteri...
What is your primary use case for Anomali ThreatStream?
I was using Anomali primarily for threat intelligence operations, security monitoring, and threat detection initiatives. I was part of the SOC team, and my role and responsibilities involved workin...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Match, Lens, ThreatStream, STAXX, Anomali Security Analytics
ARCON UBA, ARCON User Behavior Analytics
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bank of England, First Energy, UBISOFT, Bank of Hope, Blackhawk Network
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam, One Identity, IBM and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: July 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.