Anomali vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 comparison

Anomali and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Anomali is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.5. Anomali holds a 2.6% mindshare in XDR, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Anomali users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Anomali and ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 are competing products in the cybersecurity domain. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 seems to have the upper hand with its advanced features and comprehensive network insights, despite Anomali's competitive pricing and customer support.

Features: Anomali is known for its threat intelligence capabilities, enabling swift threat identification and mitigation. It offers integration with existing security systems and is favored for its reliable threat data feeds. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 provides in-depth network visibility, real-time analytics, and comprehensive packet capture, which are vital for proactive threat detection and delivering robust security insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Anomali offers straightforward integration with existing systems, backed by reliable customer support during setup. It focuses on ease of integration minimizing disruption to operations. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 utilizes a cloud-based deployment model, allowing for flexibility and scalability. However, it may require more initial technical expertise to deploy effectively, which can be supported by its customer service team.

Pricing and ROI: Anomali offers a cost-effective setup, leading to quicker ROI due to lower upfront costs. Its pricing model is designed for quick adoption without heavy investment. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 has a higher cost, but its extensive feature set can lead to significant long-term ROI. Its pricing reflects the broad array of network security solutions it provides, justifying the investment for businesses seeking advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Anomali vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Anomali vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,099 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 4.5%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Anomali is 2.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	4.5%
Anomali	2.6%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360	1.0%
Other	91.9%

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

TarunKumar11

Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

Strategic threat intelligence has improved detection speed and consistently reduces analyst workload

Anomali can be improved in various aspects. Its AI-driven automation can further advance, and AI-powered investigation summaries can improve. User experience could be enhanced through simplification of workflows. Better board-level cyber risk dashboards could provide easier visualization. Additionally, Anomali could work on simplifying the pricing structure. Although it excels in threat intelligence aggregation and operationalization, stronger GenAI capability, improved executive reporting, and a more intuitive workflow for analysts would further increase SOC efficiency and add more business value. Regarding Anomali's AI capabilities, governance and security are quite good. Anomali has incorporated AI and machine learning primarily to improve correlation and prioritization. These capabilities are valuable but could be more mature. The platform could achieve better threat correlation, prioritization, more anomaly detection, and allow AI to accelerate intelligence analysis while further improving quality and relevance. The accuracy and reliability of Anomali's AI output are fairly reasonable and good. The AI engine works well, but this capability could be improved. Better threat correlation with threat actors, certain indicators of compromise, malware, and campaigns is possible. Threat prioritization could increase, and alert noise could be reduced through further de-duplication. While reasonable, this is not the best available, and other products possibly have more AI maturity, such as Recorded Future and CrowdStrike Falcon.

Read full review

reviewer2857197

Lead IT Service Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud-native threat detection has improved incident investigations and now reduces breach risk

We have covered most of the features over the past three years and look forward to discovering more as we work closely with the ExtraHop technical team, who are open to sharing what they have developed. Pricing is on the higher side, typically based on load, volume of traffic, and deployment scale. The advanced detection capabilities provide significant value in reducing investigation time, making the licensing and pricing acceptable for larger organizations. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 has undeniably improved our security posture, reduced manual investigation efforts, and facilitated fast threat detection mechanisms, which all help prevent costly potential breaches in enterprise environments. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360's SaaS environment is well-suited for cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments, effectively addressing real-life scenarios involving east-west and north-south traffic. The platform is recommended for large organizations in need of comprehensive detection capabilities. I would rate this product overall as an 8 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."

"The solution allows us to make investigations. Other XDR solutions also provide similar capabilities but for investigation, Cortex XDR is better."

"The interface is easy to use and it is more up to date than our previous solution."

"The product is mostly automated, and we do not have to make decisions, because all the decisions are made by the product itself and we are not required to create any custom policies since the policies that are created are well defined in the product itself."

"It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core."

"My advice for anybody who is considering Cortex XDR is that it is a complete solution, and has very good features."

"But overall, when we speak about security and protection, they are one of the top providers."

"The best feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it collects logs from different sections such as the endpoint, the network, and the cloud, making it easy to investigate alerts, collect some of the investigation packages related to the infected machines, and provide live response."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Anomali has positively impacted my organization and my clients by helping them improve threat visibility, accelerate incident response, and make better use of their resources."

"With Anomali, we benefit by obtaining threat information prior to incidents, making our threat hunts proactive and having incident response plans ready, which saves almost 40% of the time from the traditional model."

"The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."

"Anomali has positively impacted our organization with many improvements since we started using it, as we receive many block hits from them, and we can say that our coverage has been extended to 90% because we do MITRE mapping."

"I think it's one of the awesome tools I've worked with to date."

"We now have a very robust collection of threat intelligence based on the capabilities that Anomali provides."

"Anomali has positively impacted my organization because earlier we were not using any TIP format and were just dependent on open source, which gave us tons of irrelevant alerts, but with Anomali, we now get very specific and targeted alerts, allowing us to navigate through a handful of alerts that are applicable to us and saving a ton of working hours."

"The most valuable aspect of Anomali is the threat modeling capability."

More Anomali pros

"ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 has positively impacted my organization by helping us detect abnormal activity on our network that we could not detect through our SIEM or XDR platform."

"It is scalable."

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"Their technical support is more effective and of better quality than other competitors."

"ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 has undeniably improved our security posture, reduced manual investigation efforts, and facilitated fast threat detection mechanisms, which all help prevent costly potential breaches in enterprise environments."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

Cons

"It tends to do 99.9% of things. The only thing I'd like is single sign-on authentication into their cloud platform so that my users can be properly authenticated against it."

"It should support more mobile operating systems. That is one of the cons of their infrastructure right now."

"As an improvement, I would like to see enhanced connection speeds."

"The solution should enhance the ADR and reporting."

"I recommend adding a data loss prevention (DLP) solution to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products."

"The connection to the internet has not performed as expected."

"They have the worst support, as a company, that I have ever worked with, as they are difficult to get a hold of and keep on the phone. They don't know what they are talking about when you get them on the phone. They don't like to respond to messages when you send them to them. They like to "research problems" for weeks on end, then pass you off to somebody else."

"A little bit more automation would be nice."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Anomali Enterprise could improve by combining all the other tools' features into one solution."

"Anomali can be improved by expanding its capability to capture a broader range of threats because it currently has limitations and may not catch everything occurring in the world, especially from the dark web."

"A lot of tools can give you many features, such as CTI intelligence and a tax service reduction. However, many people are combining different tools together to have more capabilities. It is up to the consumer whether they want to have multiple tools or have one tool that serves the purpose. Anomali Enterprise could improve by combining all the other tools' features into one solution."

"Pricing and licensing are good, but the costs for purchasing threat feeds are somewhat complicated and a bit on the higher side."

"Support in the past has been top-notch, but recent trends indicate that it has taken a back seat, as we often don't get answers for days."

"Anomali can be improved, specifically the Security Analytics feature, because I feel there is a slight lag in that."

"An area for improvement is the intelligence sharing within the Anomali community. The tagging system can be inconsistent, as any company can use any tags for their reporting."

"While reasonable, this is not the best available, and other products possibly have more AI maturity, such as Recorded Future and CrowdStrike Falcon."

More Anomali cons

"Their professional service can be improved."

"I would like to see ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 improved by integrating XDR features with NDR."

"One challenge with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is its pricing, which tends to be comparatively high in the marketplace."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"There needs to be more support."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"This is an expensive solution."

"The price of the product is not very economical."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"When comparing the price of Anomali Enterprise to other solutions it is in the medium to high range. However, I am satisfied with the price."

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anomali Enterprise?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that there are not many follow-ups, but once we interacted w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Anomali ThreatStream?

I can mention one point regarding improvements for Anomali, which is more enhanced reporting flexibility. The reporti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Anomali ThreatStream?

I was using Anomali primarily for threat intelligence operations, security monitoring, and threat detection initiativ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

One challenge with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is its pricing, which tends to be comparatively high in the marketplace. In...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

We have covered most of the features over the past three years and look forward to discovering more as we work closel...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud?

I use ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 as our cloud-native NDR platform, with primary use cases including monitoring real-time ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Anomali

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Anomali

Compared 3% of the time

Recorded Future vs Anomali

Compared 3% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Network Security vs Anomali

Compared 3% of the time

Hunters vs Anomali

Compared 3% of the time

More Anomali Competitors

Vectra AI vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 12% of the time

NetWitness NDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 9% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 2% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

August 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Anomali

August 2026

Download Anomali product report

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

August 2026

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Match, Lens, ThreatStream, STAXX, Anomali Security Analytics

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Anomali delivers user-friendly cyber threat intelligence, offering concise insights with robust capabilities for evolving scenarios.

Anomali offers a powerful platform for cyber threat intelligence, allowing organizations to efficiently stream and analyze threat feeds. It excels in threat modeling, prioritizing intelligence, and supporting large-scale automation through its API, fostering a proactive security approach.

What are Anomali's Key Features?

Threat Intelligence: Provides concise and user-friendly intelligence.
Threat Modeling: Enables prioritization and efficient organization of intelligence.
Credential Monitoring: Performs quickly with efficient dataset handling.
API Automation: Supports large-scale automation for robust intelligence management.
Adaptability: Offers capabilities to grow beyond initial use cases.

Which Benefits or ROI Should Users Consider?

Efficient Intelligence Collection: Quickly gathers and organizes data for use.
Enhanced Threat Analysis: Correlates data effectively for proactive security.
Automation Support: Saves time with extensive API capabilities.
Scalability: Adapts and scales with emerging security needs.

Anomali serves as a crucial tool for threat intelligence in industries ranging from finance to healthcare. Organizations stream threat feeds into Anomali to correlate and aggregate data, enhancing security measures and facilitating thorough threat investigations. Its adaptability makes it suitable across different sectors.

Anomali

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers advanced network detection and response capabilities, designed to provide real-time situational awareness and threat detection across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Built to meet the demands of modern enterprises, ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 enhances visibility into network activities, delivering comprehensive security insights. It uses high-speed data analysis to identify anomalous behaviors and potential threats, helping security teams respond effectively. With centralized visibility, it ensures quick detection and thorough investigation of threats within complex infrastructures, including cloud, edge, and on-premises environments.

What key features does ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offer?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Monitors network traffic in real-time for immediate threat identification.
Centralized Visibility: Offers a unified dashboard for observing activities across diverse environments.
Automated Response: Enables predefined actions to mitigate threats swiftly without manual intervention.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools for enhanced incident management.
Advanced Analytics: Utilizes machine learning to detect sophisticated threats promptly.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

Improved Security Posture: Evidence of enhanced organizational security through faster threat detection and response.
Operational Efficiency: Reduction in time and effort for IT teams due to automated processes.
Scalability: Flexibility to expand with organizational growth and technology changes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Attractive pricing compared to functionality and outcomes offered.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is implemented across industries such as financial services, healthcare, and retail, where robust security measures are paramount. In these sectors, the capabilities of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 align with the need for secure handling of sensitive data and compliance with industry regulations, providing valuable protection and detection capabilities.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Bank of England, First Energy, UBISOFT, Bank of Hope, Blackhawk Network

Wizards of the Coast

Buyer's Guide

Anomali vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

June 2026

Free Report: Anomali vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Find out what your peers are saying about Anomali vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Anomali vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.