Apache Web Server vs Azul Zing comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Apache and Azul Systems are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Azul Systems is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Apache holds a 6.4% mindshare in AIS, compared to Azul Systems’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Azul Systems users who would recommend it.

Apache Web Server

Read 24 Apache Web Server reviews

4,015 Views
3,975 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azul Zing

Read 10 Azul Zing reviews

2,168 Views
1,496 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

Azul Zing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Apache Web Server and Azul Zing are competitors in server solutions. Apache is more prevalent due to its open-source flexibility and adoption, but Azul Zing is superior for high-performance Java applications.

Features: Apache Web Server offers versatility, extensive plugin support, and stability across platforms. Azul Zing provides a pauseless garbage collector, high Java application performance, and low-latency operation.

Room for Improvement: Apache could enhance its paid support and improve scalability features for large enterprises. It may also benefit from better integration with certain modern development tools. Azul Zing can work on reducing licensing costs, enhancing documentation for broader usability, and expanding support for non-Java environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache benefits from community-driven support and extensive resources for ease of deployment. Customer support is varied, dependent on third-party services. Azul Zing offers specialized enterprise-level Java support, ensuring easier deployment in tech-intense environments. Its customer service is highly professional and custom-tailored.

Pricing and ROI: Apache is cost-effective as a free, open-source solution, maximizing ROI for flexible web solutions. Azul Zing requires licensing fees, justified by its specialized Java enhancements and enterprise support. The pricing reflects its value, especially for businesses focused on Java performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Azul Zing

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

11th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Customer Experience Personalization (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 6.4%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azul Zing is 2.8%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Web Server	6.4%
Azul Zing	2.8%
Other	90.8%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

Mohakhan Khan

Software Technical Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Real-time charging has stayed consistent and cuts GC incidents while reducing cloud costs

The best features Azul Zing offers include no stop-the-world during the full GC. No stop-the-world pauses during full GC, and we hit higher TPS with fewer JVMs -- a real win for maintenance and cost. As an online charging system, we can't afford crashes or latency spikes. Before Zing, JVMs would hang and drop from the grid on missed heartbeats. GC tuning is also out-of-the-box -- no more time consuming manual tuning like with Oracle/OpenJDK with no significant outcome.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing about Apache is that it is open-source, so implementing my platform on-premises is less expansive than other solutions."

"Its community is its most valuable feature, and solving problems is easier on Apache because so many people know this product."

"In my experience, Apache Web Server has been a good and stable solution."

"It is scalable."

"It is more secure to use Apache and you will have fewer problems than other web services."

"The solution offers good security."

"I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server; you can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it."

"Apache Web Server is free of cost."

More Apache Web Server pros

"With minimal effort, Zing has helped us improve our latency performance drastically."

"Performance of the JVM, especially the C4 Pauseless Garbage Collection, for continuous application execution is the most valuable feature."

"The non-stop garbage collector (C4 - Continuously Concurrent Compacting Collector) is the most valuable feature."

"With minimal effort, Zing has helped us improve our latency performance dramatically."

"GC Pause times are maintained in low milliseconds, which is beneficial for applications with high volume, high memory allocation rate, and a high memory footprint, and it also increases throughput by approximately 20-25% as compared to Oracle Java Development Kit based on some tests that I have done with real applications."

"No other JVM on the market even comes close to competing with the Azul Zing."

"With minimal effort, Zing has helped us improve our latency performance dramatically."

"After using Azul Zing, it is almost a zero-incident situation because of the GCs."

More Azul Zing pros

Cons

"It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need."

"For NGINX, I think it has NGINX Management Suite, which is GUI-based and allows you to manage your configuration via the user interface, but Apache fails to offer such capabilities to users."

"If Apache master the ability of hosting websites/web apps that use Microsoft's .Net framework then it will definitely be the best web server to use."

"So far, for us, everything is okay."

"By optimizing the infrastructure to allow the webserver to directly handle queries from memory—particularly by prioritizing the storage of queries in memory and processing them through the web server interface—I could potentially cut down the required instances from five hundred to two hundred."

"The GUI for the less experienced users needs some improvement. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience."

"The only thing that gives me a frown about the Apache Web Server is the command-line configuration."

"I want the user interface to be more user-friendly."

More Apache Web Server cons

"Although Azul claims to have a fast warmup, we still experience higher latency for the first trade when our system starts up on Sundays."

"It is extremely expensive."

"Although Azul claims to have a fast warmup, we still experience higher latency for the first trade when our system starts up on Sundays."

"The licensing over non-production environments considerably affects the cost of our solution as a software vendor."

"However, like every other great product, there is always something that can be improved."

"The profiling tools included with Zing lag behind those available for Oracle's Java implementation."

"We have encounter stability issues and that has been a source of frustration at times."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"It is an open-source solution."

"The apache software is free, open-source."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?

I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azul Zing?

Setup cost isn't significant, the documentation is clear and straightforward, and licensing is simple. I'm not directly involved in pricing negotiations, but given we run it across many production ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azul Zing?

Nothing major, but one nuance: Zing auto-adjusts internal config based on available CPUs, which can cause brief CPU spikes every few minutes. These are harmless, but can give ops/monitoring teams a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azul Zing?

We run a large in-memory data grid to store millions of customers -- clusters of up to 30-40 JVMs, each with ~90GB heap, deployed across a variety of infrastructure including Azure, AWS, and on-pre...

See all answers

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 14% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 11% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Zend PHP Engine vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

Azul Zulu vs Azul Zing

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Hotspot vs Azul Zing

Compared 14% of the time

Zulu Embedded vs Azul Zing

Compared 13% of the time

Zenoss Cloud vs Azul Zing

Compared 12% of the time

Atos DirX Directory vs Azul Zing

Compared 2% of the time

More Azul Zing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

October 2026

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Azul Zing

October 2026

Download Azul Zing product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

No data available

Overview

Apache Web Server is a stable, open-source platform known for its cost-effectiveness, multi-platform compatibility, ease of setup, and high security. It supports various web scripting languages and enables HTTPS services, making it a popular choice for many organizations.

Apache Web Server offers extensive features including HTTP server capabilities and modularity. It efficiently handles client requests and is highly flexible, which is why many companies utilize it for hosting applications, developing websites, and more. Community support further enhances its reliability, though improvements like integration with cloud systems such as Kubernetes, a simplified port management, and support for Microsoft's .Net framework are desired. Initial setup challenges exist, and enhanced security features and GUI updates would benefit less experienced users. Apache needs optimization for resource efficiency and compatibility with modern application architectures.

What are the most important features of Apache Web Server?

Open-Source: Apache is free and community-driven.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works on multiple operating systems.
Modular Architecture: Allows scalability and customization.
Secure: Supports HTTPS services and has WAF capabilities.
Performance: Efficiently handles client requests.

What benefits can users expect from using Apache Web Server?

Cost-Effective: No licensing fees associated.
High Reliability: Community support ensures stability.
Flexibility: Easily integrates with numerous frameworks.
Scalability: Modular design aids in scaling operations.
Community Support: Continuous updates and enhancements.

Apache Web Server is widely used across different industries such as financial sectors for hosting applications and core banking systems. Integrated with tools like JMeter and Tomcat, it is pivotal in deploying web servers and acting as a proxy for application servers. In cloud migrations, its open-source WAF features using ModSecurity are invaluable, and companies rely on its capabilities for managing threats and attacks through HTTP/HTTPS connections.

Apache

Azul Zing is a high-performance Java Virtual Machine designed for real-time workloads, offering low latency and high throughput. Zing is optimized for enterprise use, making it ideal for financial services, gaming, and ecommerce.

Leveraging Azul's unique C4 garbage collector, Azul Zing enhances Java application performance by eliminating pauses and reducing latency, crucial for applications demanding consistent response times. The platform is known for its scalability and stability, ensuring swift adaptation to demanding workloads. Its architecture supports quick deployment and seamless operation in modern infrastructure, catering to enterprises that prioritize performance and reliability in mission-critical applications.

What are the key features of Azul Zing?

C4 Garbage Collector: Provides continuous operation without pauses.
Elastic Memory: Dynamically adjusts memory allocation based on needs.
Scalability: Easily scales with increased workload demands.
High Throughput: Optimized for intensive data processing tasks.

What benefits can Azul Zing offer?

Improved Latency: Minimizes delay in data processing.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure overhead through optimal resource use.
Enhanced Performance: Boosts application responsiveness and user satisfaction.
Seamless Integration: Fits into existing IT environments without extensive modification.

Azul Zing implementation is prevalent in industries like finance and telecommunications where rapid data processing and minimal latency are crucial. Its technology helps financial services handle trade cycles efficiently and assists telecommunications in processing large volumes of data with minimal downtime.

Azul Systems

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

Priceline, RBS, Credit Suisse, ING, Creditex, Nielsen, Workday, Saks Fifth Avenue, Entergy, Quotix, Puma and many more. Visit azul.com for more.

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing

November 2026

Free Report: Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Web Server vs. Azul Zing report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.