Apiary vs Microsoft Azure API Management comparison

Oracle and Microsoft are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #38, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9. Oracle holds a 0.6% mindshare in APIM, compared to Microsoft’s 15.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Apiary

Read 4 Apiary reviews

564 Views
564 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure API Management

Read 83 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews

15,747 Views
15,747 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Apiary

Microsoft Azure API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and Apiary are competing in the API management space. Microsoft Azure API Management seems to have the upper hand due to its robust scalability and integration within Microsoft's ecosystem.

Features: Azure API Management provides comprehensive monitoring and analytics, robust security controls, and seamless integration with other Azure services. Apiary offers user-friendly API design, advanced documentation tools, and mock API capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Azure's complexity can be challenging for new users and its cost may be high for smaller teams. Apiary could enhance its enterprise-focused functionalities, expand its integration capabilities, and offer more comprehensive security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure offers a cloud-based deployment with extensive support resources, though it can be complex. Apiary provides straightforward deployment with fast onboarding, supported by a responsive community.

Pricing and ROI: Azure has higher upfront costs reflecting its extensive features, suitable for large-scale operations. Apiary presents a lower-cost entry, ideal for agile development and small projects, offering strong ROI through rapid prototyping capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiary

Ranking in API Management

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apiary is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 15.0%, down from 19.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure API Management	15.0%
Apiary	0.6%
Other	84.4%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Phil Wilkins

Enterprise Integration Architect at Capgemini

The ability to configure rules to check for consistency has helped

Apiary provides a free tier of the platform which allows a small group of developers to collaborate easily on the design of open source APIs. In addition to this, it provides mock endpoints allowing people to experiment with the API without depending or having to stand up a real backend. With our clients, using Apiary allows us to very quickly pull together an API definition (particularly when using API Blueprint). The whole API design process for the simpler use cases can be done in a relatively short workshop which makes it a lot easier to agree, publish, version-manage an API definition with suitable documentation. This can then be evolved and enhanced (particularly in the documentation aspects). With the ability to support Swagger (Open API v2 and introducing/ed support for v3) and API Blueprint makes it a very versatile tool.

Read full review

Rajeev Jha

Database Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Facilitating seamless integration and robust security support

The integration process is very easy, which is crucial for our organization. Another valuable aspect is the support from Microsoft. Whenever support is required, it is readily available. Additionally, I appreciate the technical expertise Microsoft brings to the table. The security features are highly satisfactory, with various options providing flexibility to implement security measures based on specific compliance requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I do like the overall performance of the solution."

"I find the generation of mock services very useful, especially when demonstrating for new consumers."

"Git integration"

"In two years, there was one time the service was down for an hour or so."

"Quick and easy way to share a new API design with teams."

"Allows the possibility of VPN technology to connect your gateway directly with on-prem services"

"The simplicity to learn and apply using API Management is valuable."

"The Application Gateway we have found to be the most useful in Microsoft Azure API Management. We have integrated the Microsoft Azure API Management with Application Gateway. Application Gateway is a type of load balancer that we are using for the high availability of our API calls."

"We use this solution for API rate limiting and for its security features against DDoS."

"I like the API Management functions."

"It seems quite good so far. It handles our current workload well, and I'm optimistic it can scale effectively as our needs grow."

"Monitoring: It gives us a detailed overview of how clients are using the API and it allows us to see the consumption trends in real-time."

"The most valuable features are the API and integrations."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

Cons

"The Oracle release cycle is very bad because the patches only update once a year."

"I would like an integrated option to download a Swagger version of the definition."

"Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and Blueprint Support"

"In terms of improvement, it would be helpful if they could develop an on-premises option."

"Support for GraphQL could be better."

"It could be more user friendly for developers. It would be nice if developers could view things more easily."

"They need to work on the third party integrations."

"The licensing fees should be cheaper."

"Specific to API development, I think Microsoft is still far behind AWS. AWS has grown by leaps and bounds, and Microsoft is a close second. But in terms of features and other stuff they provide, Microsoft's compatibility with publicly available APIs is a little limited. So, that is a little bit of a constraint. But what they provide is good, it's just that they need to build more on their API suite. I think Google is doing a really good job at that."

"The solution's data mapping and orchestration are very code-intensive or require callouts to external systems."

"The developer console for external users could be improved, especially in the testing site."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a free subscription option to start and try the service."

"It is easy to get started with personal (free) accounts, but a subscription is required for additional features."

"The licensing fees are expensive."

"Since this is a cloud-based solution you have to abide by those financial limits, this creates some different challenges compared to other solutions."

"Because of our partner relationship, our pricing is pretty decent. But in general, if I compare pricing, I think the initial offer that we got from Microsoft until the relationship kicked in was more expensive than AWS. There were some unexpected expenses because we had to pause. This was due to our inexperience and because we were doing this significant public cloud migration for the first time. We were using SAP on a public cloud for the first time."

"There are no additional costs above the main license."

"We are paying standard fees to use Microsoft Azure API Management."

"This is an expensive solution."

"It's an expensive solution"

"The price is comparable."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	53

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apigee vs Apiary

Compared 38% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Apiary

Compared 37% of the time

SwaggerHub vs Apiary

Compared 25% of the time

More Apiary Competitors

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 61% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 10% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 4% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 3% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

January 2026

Download Apiary product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management

January 2026

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

Overview

Apiary's pioneering APIFlow solution provides the framework and tools for developing application programming interfaces (APIs) that share enterprise services and data and help create modern, cloud-based applications and experiences. APIFlow spans the API creation lifecycle, including design, governance, testing, and documentation, while supporting API Blueprint and OpenAPI industry standardsץ

Oracle

Microsoft Azure API Management offers a comprehensive solution for managing APIs, ensuring security, integration, and access across cloud environments. It enables seamless API orchestration and supports flexible management systems, making it valuable for API-driven architectures.

Microsoft Azure API Management is an advanced platform designed for seamless API integration and management within Microsoft's ecosystem. It provides robust security capabilities, including access control and Active Directory integration. The platform features a developer portal for easy API documentation and testing, along with real-time monitoring, analytics, and configurable policies to enhance API behavior. With hybrid cloud support and API orchestration, users gain flexibility and the ability to monetize APIs through subscriptions. The platform aids businesses in modernizing their applications and processes, but users have highlighted the need for enhanced scalability, third-party integration, improved documentation, and more comprehensive pricing models.

What are the most important features of Azure API Management?

User-friendly setup facilitating ease of integration
Robust security with access control and Active Directory
Comprehensive developer portal for API documentation and testing
Real-time monitoring and analytics
Flexible policy configuration for API orchestration
Hybrid cloud connectivity support
Monetization through subscription models

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Azure API Management reviews?

Enhanced API security and governance
Efficient backend system connections
Improved application monitoring and orchestration
Seamless migration from legacy to API-driven interfaces
Support for modernizing applications and automating processes

Azure API Management is widely implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail to integrate and manage internal and external APIs. Businesses use it for secure connections, microservices support, and modernizing legacy systems. It's also adopted for subscription models and access control, aiding companies in automating and enhancing their operational processes.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce.com, Bloomberg, GoodData, Viacom, Akamai Technologies, DigitalGlobe

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management

December 2025

Free Report: Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.