Apiary vs Microsoft Azure API Management comparison

Oracle and Microsoft are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #37, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in APIM, compared to Microsoft’s 16.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Apiary

Read 4 Apiary reviews

417 Views
413 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure API Management

Read 82 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews

18,860 Views
18,860 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Apiary

Microsoft Azure API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and Apiary are competing in the API management space. Microsoft Azure API Management seems to have the upper hand due to its robust scalability and integration within Microsoft's ecosystem.

Features: Azure API Management provides comprehensive monitoring and analytics, robust security controls, and seamless integration with other Azure services. Apiary offers user-friendly API design, advanced documentation tools, and mock API capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Azure's complexity can be challenging for new users and its cost may be high for smaller teams. Apiary could enhance its enterprise-focused functionalities, expand its integration capabilities, and offer more comprehensive security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure offers a cloud-based deployment with extensive support resources, though it can be complex. Apiary provides straightforward deployment with fast onboarding, supported by a responsive community.

Pricing and ROI: Azure has higher upfront costs reflecting its extensive features, suitable for large-scale operations. Apiary presents a lower-cost entry, ideal for agile development and small projects, offering strong ROI through rapid prototyping capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 866,218 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiary

Ranking in API Management

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apiary is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 16.7%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure API Management	16.7%
Apiary	0.4%
Other	82.9%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Phil Wilkins

Enterprise Integration Architect at Capgemini

The ability to configure rules to check for consistency has helped

Apiary provides a free tier of the platform which allows a small group of developers to collaborate easily on the design of open source APIs. In addition to this, it provides mock endpoints allowing people to experiment with the API without depending or having to stand up a real backend. With our clients, using Apiary allows us to very quickly pull together an API definition (particularly when using API Blueprint). The whole API design process for the simpler use cases can be done in a relatively short workshop which makes it a lot easier to agree, publish, version-manage an API definition with suitable documentation. This can then be evolved and enhanced (particularly in the documentation aspects). With the ability to support Swagger (Open API v2 and introducing/ed support for v3) and API Blueprint makes it a very versatile tool.

Read full review

Praveen_Srivastava

Solution Architect at Cognizant

Streamlined operations with gateway and authentication features

Azure API Management has helped streamline our operations by acting as a gateway for upstream and downstream applications. It provides authentication and authorization, ensuring that both verified and suspicious users are managed efficiently. The use of analytics within API Management is also valuable for tracking user behavior and ensuring security.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Git integration"

"Quick and easy way to share a new API design with teams."

"I find the generation of mock services very useful, especially when demonstrating for new consumers."

"I do like the overall performance of the solution."

"In two years, there was one time the service was down for an hour or so."

"It's a very robust tool. So you see that there is a developer portal which can be used by developer or the vendors as well. And other external partners to create keys and manage their own APIs. The other thing is that they have a lot of policies there are too many options within API. So I do the difficult to tell one, but probably I would say, like, proxy sorry. The policies is one of the thing wherein you can just configure the policies and modify the behavior of the APIs."

"I like that security features can be integrated with API Management. I also like that you can perform rate-limiting and throttling functions."

"The integration process is very easy, which is crucial for our organization."

"I like the support they provide for the APIs more than the solution itself. First of all, documentation-wise, both Microsoft Azure and even Google Cloud are up there. But in comparison, the real-time consulting and support for APIs make Microsoft stand out a little. I also like the performance. Standard public cloud provider-built APIs are more resilient and flexible in terms of what feature you want to use and what feature you don't want to use, and they're more customizable. They are more resilient in terms of performance in that particular environment because that is the design aspect of the offering. When public clouds build APIs and deploy them after testing them on their framework for a certain amount of time, I feel there is a massive difference in the product's performance. On the interface, everything is strong."

"The integration with Azure Active Directory is a good security feature for authentication and authorization. There is multifactor authentication. You can also use all of the Azure AD features integrated with API Management."

"Security is the top feature of Azure API Management."

"The API management is very good."

"Microsoft Azure API Management is better because it has a DevOps integration by default."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

Cons

"I would like an integrated option to download a Swagger version of the definition."

"Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and Blueprint Support"

"The Oracle release cycle is very bad because the patches only update once a year."

"Azure API Management could be improved with better integration with all of Microsoft's tools."

"The solution's data mapping and orchestration are very code-intensive or require callouts to external systems."

"In the next release, Azure APIM should include deployment in various environments and CI/CD for deployment."

"Microsoft Azure API Management could be improved by enhancing the preview feature, specifically the workspaces."

"The licensing fees should be cheaper."

"The hybrid part could be improved because API Management is entirely cloud-based, but some of our resources are on-prem, so formatting is an issue. Our goal is dual implementation."

"The licensing part of Microsoft is always higher than other platforms, like Amazon services and other cloud services."

"The cloud deployment performance could be better."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is easy to get started with personal (free) accounts, but a subscription is required for additional features."

"There is a free subscription option to start and try the service."

"We pay for a yearly license."

"The solution appears cheaper because it's a cloud SaaS model."

"It is an expensive solution, but any API solution will be expensive."

"Since this is a cloud-based solution you have to abide by those financial limits, this creates some different challenges compared to other solutions."

"Microsoft Azure is an expensive solution not for the large enterprises but for the medium and small."

"Azure API Management is the most expensive solution on the market."

"It's an expensive solution"

"It's being paid monthly."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman Enterprise vs Apiary

Compared 42% of the time

Apigee vs Apiary

Compared 28% of the time

More Apiary Competitors

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 49% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 16% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 4% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

July 2025

Download Apiary product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management

August 2025

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

Overview

Apiary's pioneering APIFlow solution provides the framework and tools for developing application programming interfaces (APIs) that share enterprise services and data and help create modern, cloud-based applications and experiences. APIFlow spans the API creation lifecycle, including design, governance, testing, and documentation, while supporting API Blueprint and OpenAPI industry standardsץ

Oracle

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?

Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
Centralized API library simplifies management.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce.com, Bloomberg, GoodData, Viacom, Akamai Technologies, DigitalGlobe

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management

July 2025

Free Report: Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiary vs. Microsoft Azure API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.