Arbor DDoS vs Fastly comparison

Read 7 Fastly reviews

694 Views
435 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arbor DDoS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Arbor DDoS and Fastly compete in cybersecurity and content delivery. Fastly appears to have the upper hand with its comprehensive features that effectively balance with investment costs.

Features: Arbor DDoS provides advanced threat intelligence, robust network protection, and effective mitigation strategies focused on security. Fastly offers a fast content delivery network, real-time traffic visibility, and superior edge computing capabilities optimal for speed and efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Arbor DDoS could enhance user interface simplicity, faster deployment, and greater automation for ease-of-use. Fastly could improve security integrations, enhance reporting detail, and expand its zero-trust capabilities to compete better in security-focused markets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arbor DDoS requires a more intricate setup due to its security focus, demanding specialized support but offering responsive customer service for maintenance. Fastly offers streamlined deployment and is known for its quick-resolution customer service enhancing hassle-free integration.

Pricing and ROI: Arbor DDoS involves higher initial investment due to comprehensive security features, ensuring substantial ROI by risk reduction. Fastly provides a competitive pricing model, delivering excellent value in speed optimization and network efficiency, emphasizing operational enhancement over security ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Arbor DDoS vs. Fastly Report (Updated: June 2025).

Arbor DDoS vs. Fastly

Download the complete report

Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arbor DDoS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Fastly

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (7th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Arbor DDoS is 13.1%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fastly is 2.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

Hamada Elewa

System Engineer - Security Presales at Raya Integration

Users have experienced comprehensive protection against DDoS threats while enjoying seamless integration

The most valuable feature of Arbor DDoS is that it is based in most of the ISPs all over the world, and Egyptian ISPs are one of them. If a customer who is getting internet connectivity from one of the ISPs has an Arbor at the end, it will be integrated with the ISP Arbor. It's some sort of closing all the cycle with Arbor DDoS, from the ISP sides and from your side as a customer. Traffic analysis with Arbor DDoS is very good; it is brilliant. They act in a different way compared to others, and the vendor support is very good. The main benefits Arbor DDoS provides to users include stopping DDoS attacks, which is the biggest nightmare for all customers.

Read full review

Nick Wilsdon

CEO at Torque

An easily scalable and stable product that provides exceptional support

The product should provide improved bot detection and management. The product should also provide support for code management. Everybody working in CDN is currently looking for ways to better manage code deployment with various authorization levels and synchronization with our lower environments. Matching up what's happening in CDN with what's happening on the origin regarding testing would always be useful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Arbor DDoS's best feature is that we can put the certificates in, and it will look at layer seven and the encrypted traffic and do the required signaling."

"It has an easy-to-understand GUI...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution is easy to use."

"It provides packet capture and we can block or whitelist whichever IPs we need to. Whatever traffic we want to block - and we get IPs from internal teams and from national teams - we block at the Arbor level only, because if it gets to the firewall then firewall bandwidth will be taken."

"I recommend using Arbor DDoS for those wanting to keep their services online."

"The technical support of Arbor DDoS is good."

"I highly recommend Arbor DDoS to others."

"Arbor has the ability to learn and self-create the appropriate profile for each customer."

More Arbor DDoS pros

"The product helps our organization to access sites located in different regions quickly."

"Compute@Edge features are valuable to me."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"Its initial setup process is straightforward."

"Fastly uses configuration versioning, where you can deploy a new version in less than one minute."

"Rate limiting is a good feature that protects from volumetric attacks."

"Support is good; the product works as advertised. We have a Slack connection with them. So we can basically ask for help, live, engage, and ring when they respond. Very quickly."

Cons

"They should improve the reporting section and make it a little bit more detailed. I would like to have much better and more detailed reports."

"I think the diversity of protection is extremely limited. It must be expanded in future upgrades and versions."

"For troubleshooting problems, it's not so intuitive. It's not straightforward. This is the core of their kernel, so they need to improve it a little bit... In F5 I have full control of everything."

"It is an expensive product, so there is room for improvement in terms of pricing."

"They also have limited sizes of the boxes. Different sizes are needed because some customers are very small while others are very big, such as ISPs, so this categorization should be available."

"We need a SaaS model for the solution."

"The look and feel of the management console is a little old, excessively simple. If you compare it with other solutions, the look and feel of the console is like you're using technology from five or six years ago. It doesn't show all the technology that is actually behind it. It looks like an older solution, even though it is not."

"It could include a lot of enhancements related to AI and automation."

More Arbor DDoS cons

"It is missing a "staging" platform to deploy a test configuration with all of the real settings, which would allow us to properly test before putting it into production."

"The product should provide improved bot detection and management."

"Support is not that great."

"Stronger analytics would be helpful, like showing configurations that haven't served a certain amount of traffic in a while. With many properties, things can get lost track of - duplicates or unused configurations not properly decommissioned."

"Fastly's customer service area needs improvement."

"What I don't like about Fastly is that they charge a heavy price."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive product. I use this product for its different features."

"The licensing of a complete Arbor solution, including fire-walling and unified site management, can get expensive."

"There is room for improvement with the pricing. It is an expensive solution. The issue with the pricing is more the way it is built. Right now we're paying per router, and there's a limitation there. I would like to see bundle-pricing where there is an overall solution cost."

"Arbor DDoS is quite expensive, but all these solutions are expensive because they deal with confidential information."

"The price of this solution is a little high in the African market, it should be lower."

"As far as I know, they are the best in this sector, in DDoS protection. They know it, I know, because their service prices are too high. They provide cloud DDoS protection for ISPs, but that is also too expensive."

"I believe that the price of Arbor DDoS falls under the bracket of medium to high price."

"Pricing is slightly on the higher side."

More Arbor DDoS pricing and cost advice

"The solution is cheaper than other products in the market."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Fastly is less expensive than one of its competitors."

"The pricing has been very competitive."

"In my opinion, Fastly is priced competitively."

"You need to pay a premium price for the tool."

"I've generally found Fastly to be very competitive in pricing, especially around Compute@Edge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

What do you like most about Arbor DDoS?

The quality of the technical support provided by Arbor DDoS is premium.

What do you like most about Fastly?

Support is good; the product works as advertised. We have a Slack connection with them. So we can basically ask for help, live, engage, and ring when they respond. Very quickly.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fastly?

You need to pay a premium price for the tool.

What needs improvement with Fastly?

What I don't like about Fastly is that they charge a heavy price. The pricing is different per region. If you have a customer who is international and has deployments in different regions, it is ve...

Radware DDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

Cloudflare vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 16% of the time

Corero vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 8% of the time

A10 Thunder TPS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

More Arbor DDoS Competitors

Akamai vs Fastly

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudflare vs Fastly

Compared 19% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Fastly

Compared 8% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Fastly

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Fastly

Compared 6% of the time

More Fastly Competitors

Product Reports

Arbor DDoS

Download Arbor DDoS product report

Download Fastly product report

Also Known As

Arbor Networks SP, Arbor Networks TMS, Arbor Cloud for ENT

No data available

Overview

Arbor DDoS provides effective mitigation against DDoS attacks with a user-friendly interface, integrating cloud and on-premise solutions for real-time traffic control and reporting. It supports large traffic volumes without latency, making it ideal for protecting online infrastructure.

Known for its intuitive GUI and rapid response, Arbor DDoS defends against complex DDoS threats using AI-driven anomaly detection and traffic categorization. It offers packet capture, robust reporting, and deployment flexibility, helping users maintain network stability and performance. While improvements in auto-mitigation, interface modernization, and scalability are needed, its hybrid protection approach efficiently secures networks for service providers and enterprises.

What are the key features of Arbor DDoS?

User-friendly GUI: Simplifies DDoS attack monitoring and management.
Real-time traffic visualization: Allows continuous analysis of network traffic.
BGP support: Facilitates secure routing for network infrastructure.
AI-driven anomaly detection: Identifies unusual traffic patterns promptly.
Automated threat response: Executes fast mitigation strategies.
Hybrid protection: Combines cloud and on-premise defenses.

Which benefits and ROI should users consider?

Effective DDoS mitigation: Enhances network uptime and resilience.
Large traffic processing: Handles high volumes without latency.
Flexible deployment: Adapts to different operational environments.
Comprehensive reporting: Provides insights into network security status.
Scalability: Supports growth in network demand and complexity.

Internet Service Providers and managed service providers utilize Arbor DDoS to secure network infrastructure and service availability. It's implemented in government and finance sectors for safeguarding customer websites and managing server traffic thresholds. Organizations deploy Arbor DDoS both on-premise and via cloud for extensive network protection.

NETSCOUT

Fastly helps the world’s most popular digital businesses keep pace with their customer expectations by delivering fast, secure, and scalable online experiences. Businesses trust Fastly’s edge cloud platform to accelerate the pace of technical innovation, mitigate evolving threats, and scale on demand.

Sample Customers

Xtel Communications

Twitter, Airbnb, Alaska Airlines, Pinterest, Vimeo, The Guardian, The New York Times, Ticketmaster, The Drupal Association, Opera, about.com, imgur, Etsy, Foursquare, GitHub, New Relic, shopify, Shazam, Firebase

Arbor DDoS vs. Fastly