Arbor DDoS vs Uplynk comparison

NETSCOUT and Uplynk are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. NETSCOUT is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.3, while Uplynk is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. NETSCOUT holds a 9.8% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Uplynk’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

Arbor DDoS

Read 56 Arbor DDoS reviews

5,461 Views
5,133 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Uplynk

Read 6 Uplynk reviews

1,798 Views
593 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arbor DDoS

Uplynk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Arbor DDoS and Uplynk compete in security for network and streaming platforms. Arbor DDoS leads in DDoS mitigation capabilities, while Uplynk is strong in streaming optimization and application security.

Features: Arbor DDoS offers predefined filters to quickly stop attacks, machine learning for minimizing false positives, and extensive traffic visualization. Uplynk focuses on optimizing application performance, provides JWT tokens for secure authentication, and offers a streamlined streaming platform.

Room for Improvement: Arbor DDoS needs to enhance its auto-mitigation feature to avoid impacting legitimate traffic and improve its UI and reporting systems. Uplynk could benefit from better documentation, faster rule deployment times, and more flexible pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arbor DDoS offers flexible deployment in on-premise or hybrid cloud environments but is deemed complex. Uplynk provides straightforward integration within cloud environments, despite limited global endpoint reach. Both products have solid technical support, but Arbor occasionally encounters slower response times.

Pricing and ROI: Arbor DDoS is considered costly with a licensing model based on throughput but proves effective in maintaining uptime. Uplynk has improved pricing but remains substantial when fully featured, appealing to budget-conscious organizations with competitive options.

To learn more, read our detailed Arbor DDoS vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS vs. Uplynk

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arbor DDoS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Uplynk

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (9th), CDN (9th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Arbor DDoS is 9.8%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 1.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Arbor DDoS	9.8%
Uplynk	1.7%
Other	88.5%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

Sanjin Zuhric

Team Lead Network Engineer at Artco Group d.o.o Sarajevo

Reliable protection ensures robust network defense and simplifies DDoS management

I am not sure if we plan to use additional features because we have many vendors and platforms that we support. We use the main function and that is it. The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based. From our sales department, they discuss that prices are very high. A potential improvement could be establishing a contract with Cisco to sell via their channel. This could be beneficial because we work extensively with Cisco. If you are a Cisco partner, you can sell Arbor DDoS. That would be good for customers that are Cisco-based because many customers in Bosnia are Cisco-based customers. BH Telecom, our main customer, sells Arbor DDoS to other customers for protection. They buy Arbor and sell the product services to others via Internet links. They sell add-on DDoS protection via Arbor DDoS. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, Arbor DDoS is not present in many customers. Some customers try to sell it, but they sell other vendors such as F5. Arbor DDoS is mainly seen in telecom operators but not much in other customers.

Read full review

Joe Hernandez

Senior Software Engineer at OmniTier Inc

Improved mobile app development and user experience through optimization and security

The most valuable aspects include the optimization of application performance by optimizing API calls for a smoother user experience and faster load times. Furthermore, I restructured our code base to establish a more efficient development workflow. During my tenure, I integrated various security features for mobile applications, such as JWT tokens for secure authentication and data encryption using AES algorithms. I also focused on secure storage options, secure coding practices, and platform-specific security compliance, like Android's SafeNet and iOS Secure Enclave.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Arbor DDoS's best feature is that we can put the certificates in, and it will look at layer seven and the encrypted traffic and do the required signaling."

"Arbor has the ability to learn and self-create the appropriate profile for each customer."

"The quality of the technical support provided by Arbor DDoS is premium."

"The AI capabilities and anomaly detection using machine learning modules like isolation forests and auto-encoders are the most effective in mitigating DDoS attacks."

"The product allows us to check real-time progress, including latency and network activities."

"We also use it by serving our customers' cloud signaling services with on-premise APS devices."

"We can reduce the bandwidth to minimize the attack level. If we see more than 2.5 GBs we drop it directly."

"Predefined filters/techniques to easily stop the attacks and start mitigation."

More Arbor DDoS pros

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

Cons

"Arbor DDoS could improve out-of-the-box reporting, it could be better."

"It could include a lot of enhancements related to AI and automation."

"Support in Argentina is not so good. Although the team is good, they are not fast, and they lack the skills to manage dynamic attackers."

"The look and feel of the management console is a little old, excessively simple. If you compare it with other solutions, the look and feel of the console is like you're using technology from five or six years ago. It doesn't show all the technology that is actually behind it. It looks like an older solution, even though it is not."

"The solution could be more granular to include logs per second and enhanced pipeline monitoring for router licenses."

"It is an expensive product, so there is room for improvement in terms of pricing."

"A small improvement could be a better reporting system."

"The solution needs to enhance its features to compete with other tools."

More Arbor DDoS cons

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is based on a licensing model that is expensive when compared to other tools."

"The solution is a bit costly if you're a small organization, but I think it's worth the price that they are charging."

"Pricing is slightly on the higher side."

"Arbor is striking a good balance between pricing and what they deliver."

"You need to find a way to get a good offering from Arbor by negotiating a price. That is the challenge."

"Our customers always complain about the price of the product."

"Start with a small license. Measure your bandwidth requirements."

"Arbor DDoS is quite expensive, but all these solutions are expensive because they deal with confidential information."

More Arbor DDoS pricing and cost advice

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arbor DDoS?

The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based. From our sales department, they discuss that prices are very high.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more affordable and now offers reasonable pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. By writing comprehensive tests and leveraging Expo's capabilities, I ensured cons...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal software engineer, and one of my responsibilities was leading mobile app development. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Radware DDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 13% of the time

Corero vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

A10 Thunder TPS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

More Arbor DDoS Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Uplynk

Compared 8% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 8% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS

January 2026

Download Arbor DDoS product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

January 2026

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

Arbor Networks SP, Arbor Networks TMS, Arbor Cloud for ENT

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Arbor DDoS offers a comprehensive defense system against DDoS attacks, integrating a user-friendly GUI and advanced threat mitigation technologies for enhanced network protection.

Arbor DDoS is recognized for its ability to manage high-volume DDoS attacks efficiently, providing extensive protection through real-time traffic analysis and automated threat detection. It utilizes advanced techniques such as blackhole and BGP Flowspec for effective threat management. Arbor's cloud signaling allows users to handle and mitigate volumetric attacks while maintaining service availability. Though it provides robust security features, users note potential improvements in auto-mitigation, scalability, and AI integration. Challenges like an outdated graphical interface, hardware stability, and false positives need addressing to further enhance its usability and integration with third-party systems.

What are the key features of Arbor DDoS?

User-Friendly GUI: Provides an intuitive interface for ease of use.
Effective Mitigation: Combats high-volume DDoS attacks effectively.
Predefined Filters: Simplifies threat management with pre-configured settings.
Real-Time Traffic Analysis: Offers insights into traffic patterns and potential threats.
Automated Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats without manual intervention.
Able to Handle High-Volume Attacks: Ensures extensive protection even under large-scale attacks.
Packet Capture and Integration: Facilitates comprehensive security analysis.
Cloud Signaling: Enhances attack traffic management through hybrid deployments.

What benefits should users expect from Arbor DDoS?

Enhanced Protection: Safeguards networks from diverse DDoS threats.
Improved Service Availability: Maintains business operations without disruptions.
Timely Reporting: Delivers detailed attack reports for proactive prevention.
AI Capabilities: Leverages AI for smarter threat mitigation strategies.
Comprehensive Security: Combines on-premise and cloud deployments for optimal defense.

Internet service providers and telecom companies commonly adopt Arbor DDoS to protect their networks and infrastructure from DDoS attacks. It is also implemented in financial and government sectors to ensure web application security and maintain high availability. Arbor DDoS supports a hybrid approach, utilizing both on-premise and cloud solutions to manage traffic efficiently and sustain service quality during attacks.

NETSCOUT

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

Xtel Communications

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS vs. Uplynk

December 2025

Free Report: Arbor DDoS vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about Arbor DDoS vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arbor DDoS vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.