Arista Networks Platform vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch comparison

Arista and Nokia are both solutions in the Ethernet Switches category. Arista is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while Nokia is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3. Arista holds a 3.1% mindshare in ES, compared to Nokia’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nokia users who would recommend it.

Arista Networks Platform

Read 27 Arista Networks Platform reviews

4,728 Views
3,972 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Read 7 Nokia Ethernet Service Switch reviews

827 Views
827 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arista Networks Platform

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Arista Networks Platform and Nokia Ethernet Service Switch are competitors in the networking hardware market. Arista Networks Platform is noted for its ease of deployment and customer service, while Nokia Ethernet Service Switch stands out with a robust feature set and value.

Features: Arista Networks Platform is recognized for automation capabilities, seamless third-party integration, and support for EVPN and VXLAN. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch includes comprehensive security features, extensive traffic management solutions, and advanced data aggregation for enhanced device utilization.

Room for Improvement: Arista Networks Platform could enhance its security features, offer more extensive traffic management solutions, and improve its complex legacy support integration. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch might benefit from streamlining its deployment process, enhancing customer interface, and offering more competitive pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arista Networks Platform provides a straightforward deployment with excellent customer support for seamless implementation. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch requires a more complex process for deployment but is supported by a dedicated team that ensures efficient issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Arista Networks Platform offers competitive pricing with favorable ROI due to lower setup costs and operational efficiencies. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch, although more expensive initially, offers extended value through advanced features that justify the higher price.

To learn more, read our detailed Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arista Networks Platform

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Center Networking (3rd)

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Ethernet Switches category, the mindshare of Arista Networks Platform is 3.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nokia Ethernet Service Switch is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Ethernet Switches

Featured Reviews

MarekSzafrański

Senior Core Network Engineer at Eurofins

Affordable for enterprise-sized companies

Speaking about whether the product enhanced our company's data center scalability, I would say that it was a solution that was used in a banking company, where it served as a replacement for Cisco. Though Arista Networks Platform is similar to Cisco IOS CLI, I feel that the former product offers better prices compared to the latter tool. Arista Networks Platform office is more efficient at a lower cost. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. The tool is stable and cheaper than Cisco. I would say that Arista Networks Platform is 100 percent compatible with the existing infrastructure in my company. The impact of the tool's network telemetry on our company's troubleshooting practices was just good for the scope for which I need the product. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Montassar Turki

Tech Lead - R&D at Numeryx

Empowering networks with enhanced scalability and reliability

It provides excellent scalability capabilities, as well as the flexibility to work with different cost structures. It supports a large number of switches very well and meets the specific requirements. In our enterprise, we currently have two hundred servers, and this technology accommodates our growing user base, which may reach millions of users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform is easy to scale."

"Arista Networks Platform offers straightforward deployment, and has good features. Support for the platform is also good."

"I like the spine as a leaf model and low latency. The hardware is robust and meets expected latency in all environments, mainly if you belong to the media or trading industry. For multicast-based solutions, Arista is number one."

"Arista Networks Platform has a feature that helps with monitoring and management."

"If someone uses Arista Networks Platform, I believe they are secured."

"Arista Networks Platform is comfortable, easy to deploy, and easy to manage, with non-blocking technology. Additionally, it has a useful CloudVision platform and automation capabilities."

"The solution has good load latency. They're the market leader in this aspect right now."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

More Arista Networks Platform pros

"The most valuable features are user functionality and interoperability."

"On several occasions we encountered major issues with the solution and have found the Nokia technical support to be quite supportive."

"The performance and reliability are the solution's most valuable features."

"The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability."

"Despite initial hindrances, once understood, these differences help in forming a good career foundation."

"The most valuable feature is the product's availability."

Cons

"Currently, Arista is too costly for its customers."

"They should have a more stable code."

"A smoother transition between ISPs during failover would improve the user experience by reducing unnecessary notifications and interruptions."

"Something that you will often hear about Arista products is that the price is a bit too high and, like with Cisco, we sometimes have problems with our customers because of its pricing."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"Arista Networks is currently less popular as they were initially more focused on data centers than campus networks. They should expand further into campus networks."

"They need to enhance their code and their EOS. They need to improve some security features, and there are quite a number of bugs in their system. So, they need to work on that piece. In the next release, we need to have a modular feature. Instead of providing an integrated solution, they should go for something modular. They need to come up with modular highly scalable models. Even at the chassis layer, I want to see some improvement."

"The CVP management platform needs to be improved."

More Arista Networks Platform cons

"I would like to see more collaboration with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) vendors, such as Itron."

"The segment routing could be improved, and they could also transfer a lot of legacy to the cloud domain."

"I would suggest improvements regarding enhancing support response times and implementing user interface modifications for quicker and more user-friendly interactions."

"The documentation needs improvement for better accessibility, as there isn't proper documentation currently available."

"The solution needs more monitoring tools."

"I would prefer that all the licenses be open for our use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is pretty pricey for a networking platform. It is on par with Cisco."

"There is an annual license required to use the Arista Networks Platform."

"I remember that when our customers were offered the Arista Networks Platform, they used a checklist to compare the prices between Arista and Cisco for their requirements, and found that the prices were almost the same."

"Specific tools definitely require a license for the subscription. But we are not using these tools in our environment. In terms of licensing, you need to spend approximately $10,000 per month."

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten where ten is high price and one is low price."

"Arista is very expensive. Not everybody is in a position to spend $70,000 to $80,000 for one switch."

"The customer price for an Arista router is approximately $7,000 USD, while Cisco's is around $18,000."

"The price of the Arista Networks Platform could be less expensive for the hardware and license."

More Arista Networks Platform pricing and cost advice

"It is quite expensive compared to alternative technologies."

"The price of the solution is very competitive in comparison with that of the competition."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ethernet Switches solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Comms Service Provider

11%

Performing Arts

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Arista Networks Platform?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista Networks Platform?

Arista products are perceived as costly, especially compared to competitors like Cisco.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arista Networks Platform?

Currently, Arista is too costly for its customers. Feature-wise, it addresses most customer requirements. However, we sometimes face challenges when integrating with proprietary protocols and solut...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

We can understand the customer network better and propose products accordingly as areas for improvement. Engaging with customers directly would improve how that could be done easily. Many times the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

I am a system integrator working for different customers. My clients use this product for their network, either for network upgrade or new rollout.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco Nexus vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Broadcom StrataDNX vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Arista Networks Platform Competitors

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 49% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 19% of the time

Huawei Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 8% of the time

Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 7% of the time

NVIDIA Mellanox vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 7% of the time

More Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arista Networks Platform

August 2025

Download Arista Networks Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Ethernet Switches

August 2025

Download Nokia Ethernet Service Switch product report

Also Known As

7000 Series

Nokia ESS, Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch, Nokia 7450 ESS

Overview

Arista Networks Platform is a stable and reliable solution for data center features, specifically for non-blocking switches used for spine-leaf connectivity with servers hooked to these switches. It also provides multi-layer switches for client networks, particularly in the banking sector.

Arista products are preferred for their stability, good hardware, ease of adoption and configuration, responsive and helpful support, and high throughput ratings. The solution has helped prevent screen loss and business outages in the media industry and is designed for next-generation data centers.

Arista

The Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch (ESS) family of Carrier Ethernet switch routers is designed to deliver advanced Carrier Ethernet services. It also provides the ideal platform for the metro Ethernet aggregation of fixed and mobile networks.

Nokia

Sample Customers

American Internet Services

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

July 2025

Free Report: Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Find out what your peers are saying about Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch report.

See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.

We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.