Astro by Astronomer vs AutoSys Workload Automation comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Astronomer and Broadcom are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Astronomer is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6. Astronomer holds a 1.3% mindshare in WA, compared to Broadcom’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Astronomer users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

AutoSys Workload Automation and Astro by Astronomer compete in workload automation. Astro by Astronomer appears to have the advantage due to its modern approach and ease of deployment.

Features: AutoSys Workload Automation provides comprehensive scheduling capabilities, support for complex workflows, and is suitable for enterprise-level settings. Astro by Astronomer offers seamless integration with cloud-native environments, a user-friendly design, and advanced data pipeline management suited for cloud-first organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AutoSys presents a robust deployment structure that requires specialized knowledge. Its technical support is well-regarded. Astro by Astronomer provides a streamlined deployment process, emphasizing ease of use and quick onboarding with responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: AutoSys involves higher initial setup costs with substantial long-term ROI, ideal for large-scale operations. Astro by Astronomer offers competitive pricing with immediate value and lower upfront investment, making it more accessible for cost-effective scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Astro by Astronomer vs. AutoSys Workload Automation Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Astro by Astronomer vs. AutoSys Workload Automation

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JAMS Scheduler

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of JAMS Scheduler is 3.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Astro by Astronomer is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 6.4%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
JAMS Scheduler	3.4%
AutoSys Workload Automation	6.4%
Astro by Astronomer	1.3%
Other	88.9%

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Latha Viswanathan

Principal Data Base And Infrastructure Engineer at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

Automation has replaced nightly monitoring and delivers reliable, unified job scheduling

We have really enjoyed working with JAMS in terms of notifications, alerts, and streamlining. There used to be a process with Automate, which is another product from Fortra, but even before that, the other division of the company that we were merging with had a tool that was built in-house called a file handler or file distributor. It was an in-house developed tool, but it was not as streamlined or as efficient as JAMS is. We literally had to have a dedicated nighttime person monitoring. Although we are 24/7, the divisions of the company that we were using JAMS for have been small scale. While we have automated it, we have streamlined it in such a way that notifications go out and alerts go out, but if there is anything, then we get paged and alerted, and if anything needs to happen at midnight, we can wake up. On the other hand, with the tool I mentioned, the file handler and distributor, we used to have a dedicated nighttime person that had to be sitting and monitoring it to see when a file arrived, whether it met the conditions, and then execute the next particular job. By using JAMS, we have gained a lot more efficiencies in terms of all of those to streamline it, and there is no necessary need for having an overnight engineer just keeping an eye on all of this.

Read full review

Fsiddiquee Sudeki

Data Platform Engineer at Babbel

Unified orchestration has reduced costs and improves governance for complex data workflows

I would say it would be much more helpful if Astro by Astronomer can provide an MCP to use and integrate with Astro by Astronomer and their AI agent Auto, so that we can use our tools like Claude, Code, or Cursor to have a central location where we integrate that MCP in Databricks via the AI gateway, and then we can have a place where we can connect to Astro by Astronomer, Databricks, other tools such as Jira and DataDog, and then have a much more comprehensive analysis and overview and monitoring of the entire data ecosystem. Having an MCP integration would tremendously help us to have a more comprehensive data platform that is more AI-ready. That is one of the features that I can think of. Another thought would be having an integration with Kubernetes instead of just scheduling everything on Astro by Astronomer workers. That would be helpful. One thing I can think of is that the Astro by Astronomer local developer environment can be improved further, but perhaps that is a very niche use case that I have in mind, and it may not be useful for others. There is room for improvement around having an improved UI and also integration with other tools. On governance, I would say we can have a more granular level of governance even inside workspaces. Having much more granular control over people belonging to the same team in Astro by Astronomer could have different access to different DAGs, depending upon our tagging strategy. That is one of the areas I can suggest in terms of improvement. The AI capabilities can be improved further. I would compare the current AI capabilities to newer models provided by Claude such as Opus or Codex.

Read full review

Pavan Katta

Assistant VP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Experience significant automation with robust integration and user-friendly interfaces

There are areas of AutoSys Workload Automation that have room for improvement. They are implementing good enhancements in the R24 release. The web UI needs some improvement. Cloud integrations are limited to 25 or 30 configurable plugins and integrations to the cloud. They can improve in that area. They have separate tools, not AutoSys Workload Automation, such as Atomic and other SaaS-based solutions that can run inside the cloud. AutoSys Workload Automation can be configured in the cloud, but it requires a substantial number of VMs depending on the load. For on-premises deployment, it is a very good solution. They need to increase their footprint in the cloud and improve the web UI. They are making excellent progress in the R24 release.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I didn't know about JAMS because I don't have a person with any challenges with the purchase administration. The feature or the user interface is user-friendly because of the readable icons or very descriptive icons. Though I'm a beginning user of JAMS, I had no issues using it."

"The scheduling and execution of jobs are the most valuable features. The scheduling is important because if there is a task we want to execute at 4:00 AM, there's no way we will have someone who can manually run the job. In addition, we execute 100 to 200 jobs per day, and manual intervention is not an option."

"We looked at other companies, like VisualCron, that were cheaper, but one of the main sticking points was the fact that they wouldn't have provided a central location for us to monitor across all servers. That was one of the biggest selling points of JAMS."

"Previously, we manually managed file transfers by writing our scripts. The automated MFT feature is great for me and the company. It helps us know where the files are going and enables us to track errors if anything fails. It also makes the connection seamless for third-party vendors."

"The alerting in it is really targeted... you can set specific alerting so that if jobs in a given folder fail, certain people are alerted. You can also set security at the folder level, so that only people in those areas can go set them. That means that the alerting and security can be set at a very granular level."

"JAMS has improved our productivity immensely because everything flows. I don't think we could operate at our current staffing levels without it."

"The planning capabilities are most valuable."

"The interface is good, and it's very easy to define and create jobs. If a job is not running or there is an error, the solution will send an email. That's all very good and very useful."

More JAMS Scheduler pros

"Astro by Astronomer has positively impacted our organization by reducing our toil and reducing the time by around twenty-five percent of what we had; before moving to Astro by Astronomer, we had to manage Airflow and manage the Kubernetes cluster as well when we were running the Kubernetes cluster locally, which saved almost one working person per month in total."

"From a business perspective, we have achieved faster deployments, reduced manual effort, improved reliability, and faster troubleshooting."

"The return on investment has been remarkable, with savings exceeding seventy-five percent compared to previous manual cron job management."

"My experience with customer support has been quite pleasant, as we always get a response."

"Astro by Astronomer has impacted my organization positively because all the automation that was done manually before is now automated and gives us more time to analyze and concentrate on important business matters."

"The best features that Astro by Astronomer offers are fairly fast deployment, convenient integration with Airflow, and it is quite easy to scale."

"When I say it simplified development and user experience, I mean that it definitely made onboarding easier and reduced time significantly."

"It is mainly an improved version of Apache Airflow, and it has improved everything from the open source Airflow."

More Astro by Astronomer pros

"Top-notch scheduling features and functionality Reliability, performance and stability Advanced GUI to manage the batch, flexibility to schedule jobs on various business needs"

"It has helped to simplify cross-dependency between MVS and Open systems jobs."

"It streamlines processing really well, so we're able to cut down on our processing times."

"Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."

"Automation of patch process."

"This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."

"Visibility into the workflow and ease of use to be able to schedule have improved our organization."

"It gives us flexibility when doing releases. We can make changes for one day in a PDS member, since we stage our jobs by date, and the next day the normal job definitions are run."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

Cons

"For scalability, I would rate it as seven because when we have a huge volume, sometimes the tool is not so responsive."

"The only thing that they could improve on is the fact that they don't have a browser version of JAMS. They've got all the bits and pieces there if you want to build your own web version of it. It does come with a web client, but it's pretty clunky. They could improve on that."

"I would like to see the ability to interface with Microsoft group-managed service accounts, but they're still in the research phase. They need to ensure everything's legit and safe. The report designer and dashboards could also be improved. We're running 7.3, so I don't know if they have updated the reporting in 7.5, but I think the reports and dashboards could be better."

"I would like a simple web interface that I could give to my team to go in and kill jobs or see why jobs died so that we don't have to drill down deeper into the application and know everything about it. It would be good to have a really clean web engine that would say here are the jobs running. We can then click to see the time running and whether any of them fails and other similar things. I know they have one, but it's not very simplistic."

"The error messages from JAMS often need clarification, hindering our ability to resolve issues swiftly."

"The tabs in the JAMS file transfer could be clearer. It would help us demonstrate to our client that JAMS not only automates jobs but also does fast transfers, and it's an alternative that supports and filters different kinds of platforms. Filtering file transfers will be highly beneficial to them."

"Sometimes the UI is not the most responsive I've ever used. But because it does its job, I don't complain."

"They recently switched to subscription-based pricing, which increased."

More JAMS Scheduler cons

"After using Astro by Astronomer for four years, I can say it has evolved significantly, which is positive; however, improving the debugging experience for complex workflows remains a pain point."

"There is room for improvement around having an improved UI and also integration with other tools."

"If I had to pick one thing that could be improved, it would be the speed when working in clouds."

"Overall, my experience with Astro by Astronomer was very positive, but there are a few areas where it could improve."

"If I had to think of one area where I see potential for improvement, it would be integration with infrastructure virtualized services like vCenter, Hyper-V, and storage systems like Hitachi and IBM FlashSystem."

"Astro by Astronomer could improve by reducing costs or decreasing infrastructure management and having less dependency on Kubernetes so that the infrastructure is simpler."

"I think there is an aspect of the tool that has caused me some difficulty, which is the scheduler, and I think it could be more intuitive or efficient."

"One area for improvement is the recent change in the UI with task groups introduced in version two point three and above."

More Astro by Astronomer cons

"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."

"Since Broadcom acquired it, the prices have increased. Many companies feel the same way and are looking for alternate solutions to replace AutoSys Workload Automation."

"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."

"It would be helpful to be able to monitor and manage workload windows so we could minimize downstream applications. This would allow us easier access to the applications."

"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve in the Linux environment. The previous versions of the AutoSys Workload Automation let you take the profile of the user that you were using to run the tasks that you're going to automate, but in the latest versions, you can't do that, you need to make more definitions and it's a little bit difficult. It was easier in the previous versions."

"We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product. We would like to see cloud integration. We are very pleased with this solution, but we are moving our application to the cloud, and we found out that it doesn't support any cloud features. So, we are trying to find a replacement."

"Documentation and cross-application externals could be improved."

"The graphical interface can be improved."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"JAMS is priced competitively compared to similar solutions and offers flexible licensing options to cater to user needs."

"Our licensing is pretty cheap because we have a state solution. So, we pay only $1,000 a year."

"The pricing of JAMS has not been an issue for us, as it has allowed us to save time."

"The licensing model for JAMS is straightforward and based on the number of agents, not the number of jobs you run. It's cheap and fairly simple."

"All licensing models are a little overpriced, but JAMS offers a good value, especially given their support response times and ability to handle unforeseen issues like the SFTP transfers. I hope to find more use cases to get a better bang for our buck."

"Definitely check how many single processes you want to run and count them as jobs. That is how you would work out your pricing on JAMS. For example, if you're running a number of commands and you can put them all into one script and run that script, you can count that as one job."

"The product is reasonably priced, and we don't have any add-ons."

"This is a good product at a fair price."

More JAMS Scheduler pricing and cost advice

Information not available

"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."

"Validate how many agents you need beforehand."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"We paid to use the solution monthly."

"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."

"It is overpriced."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Educational Organization

13%

University

Financial Services Firm

33%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	79

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?

I was not really involved in the pricing, setup cost, and licensing at that level. I am more involved in the technica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JAMS?

In terms of improvements, I believe JAMS can enhance its user interface for better user experiences. I would like to ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JAMS?

My primary use case for JAMS is enterprise workload automation and batch job orchestration. I use it to schedule and ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Astro by Astronomer?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been very good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Astro by Astronomer?

Astro by Astronomer can be improved; they are doing a lot of progress on observability. How to see how all the pipeli...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Astro by Astronomer?

My main use case for Astro by Astronomer is to manage our data pipelines, to run DBT processes, and to run all data f...

See all answers

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful b...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

It is reasonably priced compared to the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation?

There are areas of AutoSys Workload Automation that have room for improvement. They are implementing good enhancement...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 10% of the time

Stonebranch vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 7% of the time

VisualCron vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 6% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 6% of the time

Automic Automation vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 6% of the time

More JAMS Scheduler Competitors

Amazon Managed Workflows for Apache Airflow vs Astro by Astronomer

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Astro by Astronomer

Compared 11% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs Astro by Astronomer

Compared 9% of the time

Control-M vs Astro by Astronomer

Compared 8% of the time

ASG-TMON Performance Analyzer vs Astro by Astronomer

Compared 5% of the time

More Astro by Astronomer Competitors

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 20% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 9% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 3% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JAMS Scheduler

September 2026

Download JAMS Scheduler product report

Buyer's Guide

Astro by Astronomer

September 2026

Download Astro by Astronomer product report

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

September 2026

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Also Known As

No data available

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

Interactive Demo

JAMS Software

Demo not available

Astronomer

Demo not available

Broadcom

Overview

JAMS is an automation orchestration and job scheduling solution that runs, monitors, and manages critical IT processes from a single console, from simple batch jobs to complex, cross-platform workflows. JAMS automates jobs across Windows, Linux, UNIX, IBM i, z/OS, and OpenVMS, with native integrations for the databases, BI tools, and ERP systems already running your business, including SQL Server and SAP. Jobs run on any schedule or trigger off other events, and dependency management keeps multi-step workflows in the right order.

Every job is centrally monitored, with notifications on success or failure and an audit trail of every execution. Built-in conversion tools migrate existing jobs from Windows Task Scheduler, SQL Agent, or Cron without rebuilding them, and JAMS replaces homegrown, single-platform scripts with one centrally managed system.

JAMS includes two AI capabilities at no additional cost. JAX is an AI agent built into the JAMS Web Client. Ask it a question in plain language, and it finds a job, troubleshoots a failure, or looks up how to do something, grounded in JAMS documentation, not general AI guesswork. It acts only when asked, and every change waits for your approval. JAMS MCP brings JAMS into the AI coding tools teams already use, including Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Claude Desktop.

Both run inside the customer's network with the signed-in user's permissions and no elevated AI account, and every action, AI-driven or not, lands in the same audit trail as everything else in JAMS.

For teams managing thousands of jobs across SQL Server, ADF, Airflow, SAP, JDE, and Banner, this cuts tribal knowledge and middle-of-the-night troubleshooting. Knowledge that once lived in one person's head becomes something any team member can ask about directly.

The AI lives in the product, not in the support queue. Support is staffed by humans JAMS will never outsource, based in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. New tickets go to long-tenured engineers, and every JAMS customer has the CEO's cell phone number.

JAMS' mission is to reduce the operational burden of critical automation, so teams spend more time on the work automation was meant to free them for.

JAMS Software

Astro by Astronomer is a cutting-edge data orchestration platform designed to simplify and streamline data workflows. It enhances productivity by transforming complex tasks into manageable processes, offering robust solutions for modern data engineering challenges.

Astro by Astronomer empowers users with a comprehensive suite for managing and orchestrating data pipelines. It stands out for its scalable infrastructure and seamless integrations, enabling organizations to efficiently process and analyze data with ease. With robust task automation, it minimizes manual intervention and boosts efficiency. Its intuitive architecture supports agile development, facilitating rapid deployment and time-to-market advantages.

What are the essential features of Astro by Astronomer?

Scalable Architecture: Enables seamless scaling to accommodate growing data needs.
Integrations: Offers wide-ranging compatibility for diverse data sources.
Automation: Streamlines processes to reduce manual work and errors.
Monitoring Tools: Provides real-time insights for effective data management.
Modular Design: Allows customization and flexibility in deployment.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Time Savings: Reduced processing times lead to faster project completion.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource usage to lower operational costs.
Improved Accuracy: Automated tasks minimize human errors, enhancing data quality.
Scalability: Supports growth and adapts to increasing data requirements.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team synergy through streamlined workflows.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Astro by Astronomer has been pivotal in ensuring data accuracy and compliance. Financial firms rely on its automation capabilities for real-time analytics, while healthcare organizations utilize it for seamless data integration, enhancing patient care and research outcomes.

Astronomer

AutoSys Workload Automation delivers comprehensive scheduling capabilities and integration features, offering users scalability and efficiency in automation across platforms. Its enhanced user-friendliness and security make it a reliable choice for job scheduling and workload management.

AutoSys Workload Automation is well-regarded for its stability and intuitive graphical interface which facilitates efficient job scheduling across platforms. Users find its security features effective in ensuring controlled access, and appreciate its ability to handle high volumes of jobs while providing seamless orchestration and monitoring. However, the interface could benefit from modernization. Enhancements are suggested for reporting features and job flow clarity. Its integration with mobility and cloud platforms requires improvement as current support remains limited. Improving monitoring capabilities, managing cross-application dependencies, and simplifying upgrades are essential. Additionally, addressing the costly licensing model and enhancing high-level system process views are significant for maintaining competitiveness in automation.

What are AutoSys's key features?

Scheduling Capabilities: Provides robust and flexible scheduling options across platforms.
Integration Features: Allows seamless automation with diverse systems.
Security Measures: Ensures controlled and secure access to resources.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers an intuitive GUI for simplified use.
High Job Volume Support: Efficiently manages a large number of jobs with ease.

What benefits can users expect?

Reduced Manual Efforts: Automates processes minimizing the need for manual intervention.
Enhanced Visibility: Improves oversight and monitoring of tasks.
Effective Troubleshooting: Streamlines troubleshooting with well-organized workflows.
Scalability: Scales across diverse environments to meet enterprise demands.
Improved Efficiency: Increases operational efficiency with optimized automation.

AutoSys Workload Automation is extensively used in industries like banking, insurance, and retail for job scheduling, batch management, and server workload automation. It supports data processing for enterprise tasks, monitors tasks, and manages cross-platform dependencies, proving to be a reliable tool for complex job orchestration in these sectors.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital

Information Not Available

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

Buyer's Guide

Astro by Astronomer vs. AutoSys Workload Automation

September 2026

Free Report: Astro by Astronomer vs. AutoSys Workload Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about Astro by Astronomer vs. AutoSys Workload Automation and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Astro by Astronomer vs. AutoSys Workload Automation report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.