Ataccama ONE Platform vs SAP Data Quality Management comparison

Ataccama and SAP are both solutions in the Data Quality category. Ataccama is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0. Ataccama holds a 9.8% mindshare in DQ, compared to SAP’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ataccama users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Ataccama ONE Platform

Read 10 Ataccama ONE Platform reviews

2,497 Views
949 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Data Quality Management

Read 3 SAP Data Quality Management reviews

466 Views
443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ataccama ONE Platform

SAP Data Quality Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2025

SAP Data Quality Management and Ataccama ONE Platform compete in the data quality solutions category. Ataccama ONE Platform holds an edge due to its advanced data quality features, justifying its higher price point.

Features: SAP Data Quality Management is known for integration with SAP environments, seamless data management processes, data validation, and cleansing. Ataccama ONE Platform provides AI-driven capabilities with data cataloging, profiling, enrichment, and dynamic data quality rules for complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Data Quality Management involves extensive integration time within SAP ecosystems but benefits from strong customer support. Ataccama ONE Platform offers flexible deployment models, including cloud options, easing implementation with slightly less extensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Data Quality Management is more affordable, focusing on existing SAP landscapes, providing favorable ROI for SAP clients. Ataccama ONE Platform, with higher setup costs, offers attractive ROI due to its advanced features for organizations beyond basic integration needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Data Quality Management Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Data Quality Management

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform

Ranking in Data Quality

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Scrubbing Software (2nd), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (4th), Data Governance (11th)

SAP Data Quality Management

Ranking in Data Quality

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 9.8%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Data Quality Management is 3.8%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Quality

Featured Reviews

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Enhanced data quality with machine learning support in diverse environments

We used Ataccama ONE to read data from the mainframe for a data quality perspective. There's a significant lack in that area with tools being able to interface with mainframe. MetLife has a diverse environment, including DB2, Oracle, SQL Server, legacy, and vSAN files. Being able to work in these various environments and put them to a single data quality tool was very appealing. Additionally, Ataccama supported AI and machine learning, which was one of the features I liked. Furthermore, we were able to interface bidirectionally with Collibra for data governance, catching data quality issues before propagating through the system.

Read full review

Rene Dorantes

IT Manufacturing Intelligence Chief at Productos Laminados de Monterrey

Scalable, stable, and offers good technical support

SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use all methods to ensure that the data interface appears on the ME system and that SAP Data Quality Management records the QM results. It would be much easier if the ME system could be integrated directly with SAP Data Quality Management. What I'd like to see from SAP Data Quality Management in the future is the integration of machines on the shop floor or a feature that connects shop floor devices. I'd also like a custom dashboard in the solution, though I wonder if that's available in the new version. The old version my company uses doesn't have that. Another feature I want in the next release of SAP Data Quality Management is better communication between the ME and the SAP systems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

"Customer service was excellent, and I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."

"It is also easy to deploy."

"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."

"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."

"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."

"The data profile itself is excellent. You can understand the quality of the data in layman's terms."

"We work with API standards or norms for internal applications, so it's essential for SSE to have tests and pass those tests according to the criteria, which makes SAP Data Quality Management very important for our products."

"Scalability is good."

"Our primary use case is for us to inspect the results from the product and material, and for releasing or leaving the status of the product."

Cons

"The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought."

"Although DQA can fetch data from most of the commonly used data sources, it has limited modifiers to get data, meaning that the number of technologies from which the data can be acquired is limited. For example, DQA does not support fetching data from Twitter or Facebook. Many competitors have this feature."

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."

"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."

"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."

"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

"They could focus more on marketing the product. The current marketing strategy is not working."

"Data movement is a pain."

"I would like for them to develop a feature to able to record all of our inspections; so all the data can go through SAP. It's not user-friendly or easy to get further analysis, so we mostly skip this step."

"There are some limitations. They are not covering complete scenarios for all the modules."

"SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use all methods to ensure that the data interface appears on the ME system and that SAP Data Quality Management records the QM results. It would be much easier if the ME system could be integrated directly with SAP Data Quality Management."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."

"There is no need to buy a license. You can just download it and use it for free."

"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?

The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?

The interfacing to tools such as Collibra was somewhat cumbersome and required more thought. While it was possible to configure these interfaces, they required some coding. It would be beneficial i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ataccama ONE Platform?

Some of the use cases for Ataccama ONE included data quality, identifying and mapping to Collibra, which was their data governance tool. It was critical for them to interface directly with that too...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Data Quality Management?

This tool itself is new. SAP Data Quality Management was brought in by SAP recently, maybe a year or two years back. We just started implementing and we still have not heard exact feedback from the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Data Quality Management?

Currently, one of our clients is seeking SAP Data Quality Management solutions, so we are exploring options in that area. The product is not mature yet, so they need to work to improve it. We are a...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SAP Data Quality Management?

For smaller organizations, I don't think this much is required. If it is a bigger size client from a business point of view, I definitely recommend this tool. They can use it if they are already us...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Collibra Governance vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 13% of the time

Talend Data Quality vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Profisee vs Ataccama ONE Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Ataccama ONE Platform Competitors

SAP Information Steward vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 31% of the time

SAP Data Services vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 24% of the time

Informatica Cloud Data Quality vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 16% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 15% of the time

Datactics Data Quality Manager vs SAP Data Quality Management

Compared 15% of the time

More SAP Data Quality Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform

August 2025

Download Ataccama ONE Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Quality

July 2025

Download SAP Data Quality Management product report

Also Known As

Ataccama DQ Analyzer

SAP BusinessObjects Data Quality Management, BusinessObjects Data Quality Management

Overview

Ataccama ONE Platform provides a comprehensive solution for profiling, cleansing, and integrating data with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing data quality and governance.

Ataccama ONE Platform enhances data profiling and cleansing with easy configuration and robust integration, such as with Collibra. Users value its drag-and-drop capabilities, supporting mainframe, AI, and machine learning. The platform improves data security through profiling and masking while offering extensive integration options. Some areas needing improvement include large database handling and batch management. Additional support for social media data sources, better documentation, and clearer language would be beneficial. Enhanced interfaces, particularly with Collibra, and refined notification systems are desired. This platform suits users seeking improvements in data quality, governance classification, and data migration, connecting with sources like Microsoft SQL, Oracle, and Teradata.

What are the key features of Ataccama ONE Platform?

Data Profiling and Cleansing: Enhances data quality with easy configuration.
Flexible Integration: Seamless integration with platforms like Collibra.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Provides ease in workflow management.
Support for AI and Machine Learning: Offers advanced analytical capabilities.
Data Security: Ensures protection with profiling and masking features.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Data Quality: Enhances data accuracy and reliability.
Enhanced Governance: Facilitates better metadata classification and compliance.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines data integration and transformation processes.
Advanced Analytics: Leverages AI for insightful data analysis.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Ataccama ONE Platform facilitates data quality management and ensures compliance by connecting with data sources such as Microsoft SQL and Oracle. These industries utilize it for data migration tasks, ensuring data integrity through mapping and transformation processes.

Ataccama

SAP BusinessObjects Data Quality Management, version for SAP solutions (DQM for SAP), enables you to embed support for data quality directly into SAP ERP,CRM and MDG applications. Start by entering a new customer, supplier, or partner record using the SAP ERP, SAP CRM , SAP MDG applications. Then this version of SAP BusinessObjects Data Quality Management software corrects components of the address, validates the address based on referential data sources, and formats the address according to the norms of the applicable country. This solution helps in avoiding the duplicate entities entering into your SAP ERP, CRM and MDG applications(supports different MDG data models for address validation and duplicate checks) and also helps in searching and improving your existing data.

SAP

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library

AOK Bundesverband, Surgutneftegas Open Joint Stock Company, Molson Coors Brewing Company, City of Buenos Aires, ASR Group, Citrix, EarlySense, Usha International Limited, Automotive Resources International, Wªrth Group, Takisada-Osaka Co. Ltd., Coelba, R

Buyer's Guide

Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Data Quality Management

July 2025

Free Report: Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Data Quality Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Data Quality Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ataccama ONE Platform vs. SAP Data Quality Management report.

See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.