Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Datadog comparison

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Read 209 Datadog reviews

25,621 Views
13,579 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Aternity AppInternals and Datadog operate in the application performance monitoring category. Datadog has the upper hand with its modern offerings and superior integration capabilities, providing more comprehensive features for diverse environments.

Features: Aternity AppInternals provides detailed transaction tracing, real-time analytics, and user-friendly agent management. Datadog supports extensive cloud integration, robust dashboards, and powerful alerting functionalities, which enhance monitoring capabilities across multiple services.

Room for Improvement: Aternity AppInternals could enhance its cloud service integrations, simplify the setup process, and expand its analytics capabilities. Datadog may focus on optimizing resource costs, enhancing user experience design, and improving support for less common programming frameworks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aternity AppInternals requires complex setup and maintenance compared to Datadog’s SaaS model, which simplifies deployment and scaling. Datadog is noted for its quick response times and thorough support, easing the deployment process significantly.

Pricing and ROI: Aternity AppInternals has lower initial costs but potentially higher maintenance expenses, while Datadog, despite higher upfront costs, provides better ROI through scalability and a rich feature set that justifies its price.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: March 2026).

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

209

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Log Management (4th), Container Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), AI Observability (1st)

Featured Reviews

PAUL JOSEPHS

Security & Performance Analytics Technical Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Points out the relevant problems in the enterprise and it's easy to understand

The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it…

Read full review

Dhroov Patel

Site Reliability Engineer at Grainger

Has improved incident response with better root cause visibility and supports flexible on-call scheduling

Datadog needs to introduce more hard limits to cost. If we see a huge log spike, administrators should have more control over what happens to save costs. If a service starts logging extensively, I want the ability to automatically direct that log into the cheapest log bucket. This should be the case with many offerings. If we're seeing too much APM, we need to be aware of it and able to stop it rather than having administrators reach out to specific teams. Datadog has become significantly slower over the last year. They could improve performance at the risk of slowing down feature work. More resources need to go into Fleet Automation because we face many problems with things such as the Ansible role to install Datadog in non-containerized hosts. We mainly want to see performance improvements, less time spent looking at costs, the ability to trust that costs will stay reasonable, and an easier way to manage our agents. It is such a powerful tool with much potential on the horizon, but cost control, performance, and agent management need improvement. The main issues are with the administrative side rather than the actual application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Transaction Tracing is the most useful. Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable."

"Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive"

"The capability of analysing each individual transaction captured to a very low level detail (method call/line of code)."

"If you want to save time for problem resolution, and to address problem on your environments you should try Riverbed OPNET."

"We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument."

"Mean time to isolate a problem has dropped by 50-75% in each region since we've deployed the Riverbed SteelCentral suite."

"I like it that one can match IPs with the application name."

"The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] pros

"APM is great and has provided low-effort out-of-the-box observability for various services."

"The full stack of integrations made it easier to monitor the different technologies and platform providers, including Software as a Service providers, that otherwise would need a lot of work and customization to be able to see what is happening."

"With Datadog, we managed to get everyone on board into a single place and a single tool, providing teams with one spot where they can check everything related to monitoring, and enabling management and leadership to have an overview of all tools working together."

"I have found error reporting and log centralization the most valuable features. Overall, Datadog provides a full package solution."

"Sometimes it's more user friendly for development teams. There are some parts of Datadog that are more understandable for development teams. For example, the APM in Datadog works more manually and works like the tools in New Relic or Grafana, or Elastic. It is easier to understand for software development teams."

"The service catalog helped improve our organization by giving a good view of the flow for our microservices applications."

"Because of our client focus, it is easy for us to sell. This is because it is easy to use and easy to set up."

"The most useful feature is the APM."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update."

"It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

"It wasn't a critical issue, but it was hot enough to where it would have been nice to get some guidance from Riverbed, but they went ahead and let us down, but that was only one occasion."

"We had issues with the end-to-end view of unique customer: reviewing end-to-end customer problems to see where a problem is about customer, code, DB or network."

"There are some functional bugs when using TTW and making report queries (to generate graphs)."

"We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods."

"The recording mechanism for synthetic transactions could be improved as well."

"They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] cons

"In some ways, the tool has a pretty steep learning curve. Discovering the various capabilities available, then learning how to utilize them for particular use cases can be challenging."

"Sometimes, for their newer features, they charge as if it's fully fleshed out, even though it is a newer feature and it may have less stuff than their other items."

"The current way accounts are billed could be vastly improved - especially when involving multiple organizations across multiple accounts in combination with reserved commitments."

"We want to reduce having to go to different screens to obtain all the information."

"We need to learn more about the session reply feature inside of DD."

"One key improvement we would like to see in a future Datadog release is the inclusion of certain metrics that are currently unavailable. Specifically, the ability to monitor CPU and memory utilization of AWS-managed Airflow workers, schedulers, and web servers would be highly beneficial for our organization."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is really expensive."

"There is occasional UI slowness and bugs."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

"The pricing came up a bit compared to their competitors. It is not that the price has risen, but that the competitors have gone down. They keep adding more features that I would have expected to be baked in at a more nominal price. I have been increasingly dissatisfied with the pricing, but not enough to jump ship."

"They prefer monthly subscriptions."

"It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost."

"Datadog does not provide any free plans to use the solution. When I start with a proof of concept it would be sensible to have a free plan to test the tool and check whether it fits the requirements of the project. Before the production stage, it is always good to have a free plan with some limited features, number of requests, or logs."

"Pricing seemed easy until the bill came in and some things were not accounted for."

"The tool is open-source."

"The price is better than some competing products."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable for what they give you. You get the first five hosts free, which is fun to play around with. Then it's about four dollars a month per host, which is very affordable for what you get out of it. We have a lot of hosts that we put a lot of custom metrics into, and every host gives you an allowance for the number of custom metrics."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	99

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Dynatrace vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

IDERA Precise vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 2% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download Aternity AppInternals [EOL] product report

Download Datadog product report

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert

No data available

Overview

Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

Riverbed

Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.

Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.

What are Datadog's Key Features?

Sharable Dashboards: Facilitate collaboration with customizable, intuitive dashboards.
Extensive Integrations: Seamlessly connects with tools like Slack and AWS to support workflows.
APM and RUM: Provides deep insights into application performance and user interactions.
Real-Time Tools: Enables agile responses to system issues with real-time monitoring.
Unified Tagging and Visualization: Eases management of complex systems with simplified visualization.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Look For?

Efficient Troubleshooting: Centralized logging speeds up the identification and resolution of issues.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrations with popular tools enhance operational efficiency.
Improved Observability: Comprehensive monitoring improves system reliability and performance.
Resource Optimization: Efficient microservices and container management leads to better cloud resource utilization.
Responsive Alerts: Customizable alerts ensure timely identification of critical issues.

In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability