Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Datadog comparison

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Read 188 Datadog reviews

24,218 Views
16,008 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Aternity AppInternals and Datadog are application performance monitoring tools, with Datadog leading due to a richer feature set.

Features: Aternity AppInternals provides detailed transaction tracing, in-depth performance analytics, and minimal overhead on application servers. Datadog offers extensive integrations, real-time monitoring, and customizable dashboards.

Room for Improvement: Aternity AppInternals can enhance its end-of-life relevance, update features, and expand infrastructure support. Datadog can optimize pricing models, enhance synthetics reliability, and provide better cross-tool integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aternity AppInternals is easy to implement with reliable support focusing on application insights. Datadog boasts flexible deployment and strong customer service, aided by extensive documentation and community support.

Pricing and ROI: Aternity AppInternals is cost-effective but impacted by its end-of-life status. Datadog, with tiered pricing, offers more features and updates, aligning costs with comprehensive capabilities for strategic benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: March 2025).

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download the complete report

Helped 845,485 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

188

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Log Management (3rd), Container Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (7th)

Featured Reviews

it_user408081

Senior Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use it to see the experience of users hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc.

* Transaction Trace Warehouse (TTW) which records all transactions all the time, and lets us see performance down to the line of code. * Browsermetrix, which is real-user monitoring via JS injection and linked back to TTW via cookie. It allows us to see the experience of every user hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc.

Read full review

Kevin Palmer

DevOps/Security Principal at Raken

Useful log aggregation and management with helpful metrics aggregation

Datadog provides us value in three major ways: First, Datadog provides best-in-class functionality in many, if not all, of the products to which we subscribe (infrastructure, APM, log management, serverless, synthetics, real user monitoring, DB monitoring). In my experience with other tools that provide similar functionality, Datadog provides the largest feature set with the most flexibility and the best performance. Second, Datadog allows us to access all of those services in one place. Having to learn and manage only one tool for all of those purposes is a major benefit. Third, Datadog provides significant connectivity between those services so that we can view, summarize, organize, translate and correlate our data with maximum effect. Not needing to manually integrate them to draw lines between those pieces of information is a huge time savings for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise."

"Transaction Tracing is the most useful. Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable."

"The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly."

"Synthetic transactions, WMI and SNMP query capability."

"The capability of analysing each individual transaction captured to a very low level detail (method call/line of code)."

"We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument."

"I like it that one can match IPs with the application name."

"Browsermetrix, which is real-user monitoring via JS injection and linked back to TTW via cookie. It allows us to see the experience of every user hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] pros

"It has turned into an operational dashboard. If you felt something is going wrong, you can immediately open up Datadog. It has been our go to application because we know the answer will be there."

"Real user monitoring gives us invaluable insights into actual user experiences, helping us prioritize improvements where they matter most."

"The intuitive user interface has been one of the most valuable features for us."

"The logging in general is one of my favorite features."

"It has scaled great. I haven't run into any problems anywhere that I've used it. They have handled everything that we have needed them to."

"For us to have visibility into our app stack and the hardware we run has been highly beneficial."

"Since we integrated Datadog, we have had increased confidence in the quality of our service, and we had an easier time increasing our delivery velocity."

"The tools are powerful and intuitive to set up."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods."

"It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

"The recording mechanism for synthetic transactions could be improved as well."

"The technical support is not very good and should be improved."

"They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker."

"We have put in a request as an enhancement that we would like to search for items. If we're searching for a URL and we want to know was it a get or was it a post."

"Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update."

"Support for PHP, DB and other applications need to be supported."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] cons

"It's not that straightforward when creating an alert. The syntax is a little confusing."

"I would like to see the integration between PagerDuty and Datadog improved. The tags in Datadog don't match those in PagerDuty, and we have to make it work."

"Datadog is expensive."

"One area where the product could be improved is Application Performance Monitoring (APM)."

"The monitors can be improved."

"It would be great if usage metrics were automatically created and we could create custom metrics, instead we ended up building some of our own stuff to track and alert on our own usage."

"I spent longer than I should have figuring out how to correlate logs to traces, mostly related to environmental variables."

"The product could be improved by providing remote control to agents, enabling them to execute automation and collections without requiring another automation tool or integration."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The solution's pricing depends on project volume."

"The solution is fairly priced but history and log storage can get costly depending on your needs."

"The cost is high and this can be justified if the scale of the environment is big."

"Pricing and licensing are reasonable for what they give you. You get the first five hosts free, which is fun to play around with. Then it's about four dollars a month per host, which is very affordable for what you get out of it. We have a lot of hosts that we put a lot of custom metrics into, and every host gives you an allowance for the number of custom metrics."

"It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost."

"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."

"Our licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis."

"Pricing is somewhat affordable compared to other solutions but in order to really lower the costs of other products you need to plan very carefully your resources usage, otherwise, it can get expensive real quick."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

37%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 12% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Datadog

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download Aternity AppInternals [EOL] product report

Download Datadog product report

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert

No data available

Overview

Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

Riverbed

Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.

Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.

What are the key features of Datadog?

Graphs and Dashboards: Visualizes servers and infrastructure with customizable views.
Metrics: Offers deep insights into system performance and user behavior.
Log Management: Provides powerful analytics for logs and seamless log aggregation.
Unified Tagging: Facilitates organization and retrieval of metrics and logs.
APM and RUM: Enables application performance monitoring and real user monitoring for comprehensive insights.
Synthetic Testing: Allows the simulation of user interactions to test application performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

System Reliability: Helps ensure uptime and performance across cloud environments.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Assists in identifying and resolving issues before they impact users.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and log management tasks.
Flexible Integrations: Adapts to various cloud services and infrastructure setups.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications to address problems swiftly.

Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability