Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Datadog comparison

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Read 211 Datadog reviews

24,375 Views
13,406 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Aternity AppInternals and Datadog operate in the application performance monitoring category. Datadog has the upper hand with its modern offerings and superior integration capabilities, providing more comprehensive features for diverse environments.

Features: Aternity AppInternals provides detailed transaction tracing, real-time analytics, and user-friendly agent management. Datadog supports extensive cloud integration, robust dashboards, and powerful alerting functionalities, which enhance monitoring capabilities across multiple services.

Room for Improvement: Aternity AppInternals could enhance its cloud service integrations, simplify the setup process, and expand its analytics capabilities. Datadog may focus on optimizing resource costs, enhancing user experience design, and improving support for less common programming frameworks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aternity AppInternals requires complex setup and maintenance compared to Datadog’s SaaS model, which simplifies deployment and scaling. Datadog is noted for its quick response times and thorough support, easing the deployment process significantly.

Pricing and ROI: Aternity AppInternals has lower initial costs but potentially higher maintenance expenses, while Datadog, despite higher upfront costs, provides better ROI through scalability and a rich feature set that justifies its price.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: February 2026).

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

211

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Log Management (3rd), Container Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), AI Observability (1st)

Featured Reviews

PAUL JOSEPHS

Security & Performance Analytics Technical Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Points out the relevant problems in the enterprise and it's easy to understand

The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it…

Read full review

Dhroov Patel

Site Reliability Engineer at Grainger

Has improved incident response with better root cause visibility and supports flexible on-call scheduling

Datadog needs to introduce more hard limits to cost. If we see a huge log spike, administrators should have more control over what happens to save costs. If a service starts logging extensively, I want the ability to automatically direct that log into the cheapest log bucket. This should be the case with many offerings. If we're seeing too much APM, we need to be aware of it and able to stop it rather than having administrators reach out to specific teams. Datadog has become significantly slower over the last year. They could improve performance at the risk of slowing down feature work. More resources need to go into Fleet Automation because we face many problems with things such as the Ansible role to install Datadog in non-containerized hosts. We mainly want to see performance improvements, less time spent looking at costs, the ability to trust that costs will stay reasonable, and an easier way to manage our agents. It is such a powerful tool with much potential on the horizon, but cost control, performance, and agent management need improvement. The main issues are with the administrative side rather than the actual application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive"

"As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues."

"I like it that one can match IPs with the application name."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise."

"The capability of analysing each individual transaction captured to a very low level detail (method call/line of code)."

"Transaction Tracing is the most useful. Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable."

"Browsermetrix, which is real-user monitoring via JS injection and linked back to TTW via cookie. It allows us to see the experience of every user hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc."

"We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] pros

"Synthetic testing is by far the most valuable feature in our organization."

"Datadog has positively impacted my organization by shortening our time to resolve incidents because it's a central place for getting all the data that we need for troubleshooting."

"It is a good one stop location where we keep all our data for our infrastructure, and it's also easier to navigate between different things."

"The intuitive user interface has been one of the most valuable features for us."

"Even if something goes wrong and the Datadog tenant becomes completely compromised or if all our monitors were to get erased for whatever reason, we can always restore all our monitoring setup through Terraform, which provides peace of mind."

"Datadog has positively impacted my organization by making finding and resolving issues a lot easier and efficient."

"With Datadog, we managed to get everyone on board into a single place and a single tool, providing teams with one spot where they can check everything related to monitoring, and enabling management and leadership to have an overview of all tools working together."

"Because of our client focus, it is easy for us to sell. This is because it is easy to use and easy to set up."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update."

"The technical support is not very good and should be improved."

"I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it is now."

"The admin dashboard could be easier as it takes a little bit of time to get used to it."

"They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker."

"We have put in a request as an enhancement that we would like to search for items. If we're searching for a URL and we want to know was it a get or was it a post."

"The recording mechanism for synthetic transactions could be improved as well."

"It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] cons

"I find the setup cost to be too expensive. The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100. I am evaluating the usage of this solution, however, it is too expensive."

"The hardest thing we experience is just training people on what to search for when identifying a problem in Datadog, and having some additional training that might be easily accessible would probably be a benefit."

"We would love to see a % consumed and alert us if we are over budget before getting an overage charge 20 days into the month."

"I would like testing for data in the future."

"Datadog can be improved by addressing billing and spend calculation methods, as it would be better if these were more straightforward."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is really expensive."

"Datadog could be improved if it could detect other software in a container or server."

"It would also be nice if we had more insight into our own usage of Datadog (agents and custom metrics). They provide a usage page which does help, but it is not in real-time."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

"My advice is to really keep an eye on your overage costs, as they can spiral really fast."

"The price of Datadog is reasonable. Other solutions are more expensive, such as AppDynamics."

"This solution is budget friendly."

"The pricing and licensing through AWS Marketplace has been good. It would be nice if it was cheaper, but their pricing is reasonable for what it is. Sometimes, for their newer features, they charge as if it's fully fleshed out, even though it is a newer feature and it may have less stuff than their other items."

"The cost is high and this can be justified if the scale of the environment is big."

"It has a module-based pricing model."

"Pricing seems reasonable. It depends on the size of your organization, the size of your infrastructure, and what portion of your overall business costs go toward infrastructure."

"They prefer monthly subscriptions."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	99

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

IDERA Precise vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download Aternity AppInternals [EOL] product report

Download Datadog product report

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert

No data available

Overview

Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

Riverbed

Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.

Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.

What are Datadog's Key Features?

Sharable Dashboards: Facilitate collaboration with customizable, intuitive dashboards.
Extensive Integrations: Seamlessly connects with tools like Slack and AWS to support workflows.
APM and RUM: Provides deep insights into application performance and user interactions.
Real-Time Tools: Enables agile responses to system issues with real-time monitoring.
Unified Tagging and Visualization: Eases management of complex systems with simplified visualization.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Look For?

Efficient Troubleshooting: Centralized logging speeds up the identification and resolution of issues.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrations with popular tools enhance operational efficiency.
Improved Observability: Comprehensive monitoring improves system reliability and performance.
Resource Optimization: Efficient microservices and container management leads to better cloud resource utilization.
Responsive Alerts: Customizable alerts ensure timely identification of critical issues.

In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability