AttackIQ vs XM Cyber comparison

AttackIQ and XM Cyber are both solutions in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category. AttackIQ is ranked #11, while XM Cyber is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. AttackIQ holds a 7.0% mindshare in CTEM, compared to XM Cyber’s 12.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AttackIQ users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of XM Cyber users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

XM Cyber and AttackIQ compete in the cybersecurity space, each providing unique methods to improve organizational security. XM Cyber has the upper hand in ease of use and pricing, whereas AttackIQ excels in providing a superior feature set, which justifies the additional investment.

Features: XM Cyber is recognized for its continuous attack simulation, automating the process of identifying security gaps and offering actionable remediation. It delivers insightful intelligence on security flaws. AttackIQ impresses with its extensive testing scenarios, enabling organizations to assess defenses against numerous threats. It provides comprehensive analytics and threat intelligence. AttackIQ's extensive testing framework offers a rich set of features, enhancing its value.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: XM Cyber is easy to deploy with an intuitive design, suitable for organizations with various technical levels. This design reduces the need for external support. AttackIQ also integrates seamlessly but needs more hands-on management. Both offer robust customer support, yet XM Cyber's simple interface makes it less dependent on additional assistance, while AttackIQ may require more initial configuration for advanced capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: XM Cyber offers an affordable initial setup, attracting budget-sensitive organizations looking for effective security solutions with evident returns through risk reduction. AttackIQ, though needing a more significant initial investment, provides extensive capabilities that justify its value over time for clients requiring detailed testing and resilience analysis. XM Cyber's cost-effectiveness contrasts with AttackIQ's premium pricing, which is balanced by its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed AttackIQ vs. XM Cyber Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AttackIQ vs. XM Cyber

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 7.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AttackIQ is 7.0%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of XM Cyber is 12.2%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zafran Security	7.5%
XM Cyber	12.2%
AttackIQ	7.0%
Other	73.3%

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

Featured Reviews

Reviewer6233

Works at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal

While Zafran Security is already a powerful tool, there are areas where it could be further improved to provide even greater value. One key area for enhancement is the searching capabilities within its vulnerabilities module. By incorporating the ability to create Boolean searches, users would gain the ability to apply more complex filters and customize their search criteria. This would greatly enhance the precision and efficiency with which security teams can identify and prioritize vulnerabilities. Having such tailored search capabilities would save time and resources by narrowing down vast lists of vulnerabilities to those that meet specific parameters relevant to our unique risk environment. Additionally, integrating more robust reporting and visualization tools would be advantageous. Enhanced dashboards that offer customizable visual representations of risk configurations and threat landscapes would facilitate better communication with stakeholders, making it easier to explain vulnerabilities and the rationale behind certain security measures. This would also aid in demonstrating the improvements and value derived from existing security investments to leadership and non-technical team members.

Read full review

reviewer2797743

Software Development Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Continuous attack simulations have improved real-world threat detection and response skills

The best features AttackIQ offers include being a cybersecurity platform specializing in breach attack simulation and AEF validation, as it tests the organization's defenses by simulating real-world attack behavior, which are aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework, providing a platform where I can run real-world attack scenarios and identify and mitigate them. AttackIQ is well-aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework and has strong continuous validation. The platform is built to run continuous and automation tests, which helps during point-in-time checks or reduces blind spots. AttackIQ positively impacts my organization as most of my colleagues and seniors have been using it to understand real-world attack scenarios and how to cope with those situations, benefiting the company, colleagues, and team. After using AttackIQ, it has helped the team and the company improve on false positives and reduce risk, as most people are now capable of identifying how to work on detection, improving fine-tuning and all those things. It has definitely benefited the organization in terms of faster risk identification and faster response times.

Read full review

Stephen Owen

Group CISO at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Has significantly improved risk visibility and optimized remediation efforts across dynamic environments

We tightly integrate with APIs, consuming feeds and open source data. We have integrated with XM Cyber, and we are elevating ourselves with AI and MCP tools as we view this as a forerunner to reducing the workload for our agents and IT staff. We're pushing all our security partners to provide AI and MCP tools. Our vision is for them to offer a chat interface where a junior IT or an experienced infrastructure engineer can ask for what needs to be patched next without using an interface. Their current interface is very usable and professional, ranking in the top tier of applications. Their reporting is good, offering custom reports, and their API integration is a new capability that serves us well. We have high expectations for the next generation, such as a chat interface to ask questions. However, everything has been very good. We push the boundaries with digital twins; I understand XM Cyber uses a similar concept of graph databases to map environments. I would like access to that and querying languages, enabling more informed business decisions. XM Cyber sees much of our estate, which is beneficial for making informed decisions, and we can harness those insights and data for business analytics. For instance, it could help us gain insights into change management—if a particular server impacts another and that server is supported by yet another server, we could glean significant insights for change management meetings.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"With Zafran Security, it integrates with your security controls, allowing you to take that risk score and reduce it based on the controls in place or increase the risk based on different factors, such as if the issue is internet reachable or if there's an exploit in the wild."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."

"After using AttackIQ, it has helped the team and the company improve on false positives and reduce risk, as most people are now capable of identifying how to work on detection, improving fine-tuning and all those things."

"XM Cyber permits us to identify if a zero-day vulnerability can affect our infrastructure; it helps me understand the company's total risk that we have in our infrastructure and workstation vulnerability, and it permits us to identify the real impact when we have a vulnerability."

"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."

"Six weeks into using XM Cyber, we saw a compelling return on investment—primarily in risk reduction, with a specific issue our other security tooling did not pick up but XM Cyber did, reducing IT remediation time and saving over 60,000 US dollars per year while significantly lowering our loss exposure amount."

"Since implementing XM Cyber, we have improved the way we are doing patching, focusing on the choke points in our patching cycle, and it improves the way we assess the risk."

"XM Cyber made it clear that browser vulnerabilities were the top priority because the platform was able to examine how vulnerabilities within our estate could be exploited and what the path would be from some bad actor in order to exploit those vulnerabilities."

"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."

Cons

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."

"They could improve support because when we need to create a super case and escalate to resolve with technical support, they resolve our ticket in approximately two weeks."

"We have high expectations for the next generation, such as a chat interface to ask questions."

"There are many interesting things about XM Cyber, but the part that can be improved is the mobile exposure and the IBM i specific equipment."

"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."

"They could improve support because when we need to create a super case and escalate to resolve with technical support, they resolve our ticket in approximately two weeks."

"We'd like to see a cheaper price."

"We have not saved any time or effort, but we can prove that the effort involved around vulnerability management has been better spent to greater effect, and we've been able to demonstrate that vulnerabilities that do represent a high risk have been remediated more rapidly and more effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We have to pay standard licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about XM Cyber?

The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for XM Cyber?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was that we have a large, complicated estate, and in the licens...

See all answers

What needs improvement with XM Cyber?

There are many interesting things about XM Cyber, but the part that can be improved is the mobile exposure and the IB...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 24% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 10% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 8% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Zafran Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Pentera vs AttackIQ

Compared 18% of the time

Picus Security vs AttackIQ

Compared 17% of the time

SafeBreach vs AttackIQ

Compared 14% of the time

Cymulate vs AttackIQ

Compared 13% of the time

SCYTHE vs AttackIQ

Compared 4% of the time

More AttackIQ Competitors

Pentera vs XM Cyber

Compared 13% of the time

Cymulate vs XM Cyber

Compared 13% of the time

Wiz vs XM Cyber

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable One Exposure Management Platform vs XM Cyber

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs XM Cyber

Compared 3% of the time

More XM Cyber Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Zafran Security

January 2026

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

January 2026

Download AttackIQ product report

Buyer's Guide

XM Cyber

January 2026

Download XM Cyber product report

Also Known As

No data available

DeepSurface

No data available

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

AttackIQ offers a seamless continuous security validation platform designed to enhance organizational resilience against cyber threats by using automated testing to improve security effectiveness.

This advanced platform empowers security teams to proactively assess and elevate their defense mechanisms. AttackIQ's capabilities allow organizations to repeatedly test and validate the effectiveness of their security controls and processes without disrupting operations. This approach presents an opportunity to obtain actionable insights into system vulnerabilities and fosters an adaptive security posture that is crucial in today's dynamic threat landscape.

What are the key features of AttackIQ?

Breach and Attack Simulation: Simulates real-world attacks to validate security controls.
Continuous Security Validation: Ensures security measures remain effective over time.
Automated Testing: Reduces the manual effort required for security assessments.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive insights into vulnerabilities and potential risks.
Threat Intelligence Integration: Aligns with the latest threat data to identify new attack vectors.

What benefits and ROI should you look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Posture: Continuously improves defenses based on real insights.
Operational Efficiency: Minimizes manual intervention through automation.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces expenditure on redundant security measures.
Improved Risk Management: Identifies and mitigates risks proactively.
Strategic Resource Allocation: Guides investment into areas needing improvement.

AttackIQ's implementation is notably effective in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government, where regulations demand stringent security compliance. The flexibility of AttackIQ allows it to adapt its testing for customized security needs in industry-specific environments, ensuring a tailored approach to bolstering cyber defenses.

AttackIQ

XM Cyber is a leading hybrid cloud security company that’s changing the way innovative organizations approach cyber risk. Our attack path management platform continuously uncovers hidden attack paths to your critical assets across cloud and on-prem environments, so you can cut them off at key junctures and eradicate risk with a fraction of the effort. This overcomes the big disconnect that security teams experience when they’re presented with endless alerts, yet can’t see which exposures impact risk the most, how they come together to be exploited by an attacker, or how to efficiently eliminate them. This approach is a complete game-changer, which is why some of the world’s largest, most complex organizations choose XM Cyber to help eradicate risk. Founded by top executives from the Israeli cyber intelligence community, XM Cyber has offices in North America, Europe, and Israel.

XM Cyber

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Hamburg Port Authority, Plymouth Rock Corporation

Buyer's Guide

AttackIQ vs. XM Cyber

January 2026

Free Report: AttackIQ vs. XM Cyber

Find out what your peers are saying about AttackIQ vs. XM Cyber and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AttackIQ vs. XM Cyber report.

See our list of best Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) vendors and best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.