Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AttackIQ vs Picus Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AttackIQ
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (49th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (18th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (8th)
Picus Security
Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of AttackIQ is 8.8%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Picus Security is 12.8%, down from 18.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Picus Security12.8%
AttackIQ8.8%
Other78.4%
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2797743 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Development Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Continuous attack simulations have improved real-world threat detection and response skills
The best features AttackIQ offers include being a cybersecurity platform specializing in breach attack simulation and AEF validation, as it tests the organization's defenses by simulating real-world attack behavior, which are aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework, providing a platform where I can run real-world attack scenarios and identify and mitigate them. AttackIQ is well-aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework and has strong continuous validation. The platform is built to run continuous and automation tests, which helps during point-in-time checks or reduces blind spots. AttackIQ positively impacts my organization as most of my colleagues and seniors have been using it to understand real-world attack scenarios and how to cope with those situations, benefiting the company, colleagues, and team. After using AttackIQ, it has helped the team and the company improve on false positives and reduce risk, as most people are now capable of identifying how to work on detection, improving fine-tuning and all those things. It has definitely benefited the organization in terms of faster risk identification and faster response times.
Ronald Paz - PeerSpot reviewer
Consulting Systems Engineer at Boomslang Tech
Continuous validation has improved detection coverage and now provides evidence-based security decisions
The best feature Picus Security offers in my experience is automated attack simulation plus MITRE mapping. It provides real evidence of control effectiveness, standardized validation using the MITRE ATT&CK framework, and enables risk-based prioritizations. For example, before Picus Security, we thought EDR was working, but after working with Picus Security, EDR detects 72% of credential access techniques. The automation and use of the MITRE ATT&CK framework have helped me significantly in my day-to-day work. For example, as I mentioned before, we thought EDR was working, but after the test with Picus Security, we detected that EDR detects 72% of credential access techniques. This changed decision-making from our opinion to metrics-driven security. The impact on the organization from using Picus Security was important because it increased visibility of security gaps, reduced a false sense of security, improved SOC detection accuracy, and supported audit and compliance in frameworks such as ISO 27001, NIST, and CIS Controls. In my project specifically, the positive impact of Picus Security was to improve our organization's security validation maturity from a reactive posture to a continuous evidence-driven validation model. We improved detection capability, reduced security gaps, and experienced faster validation of security controls. Specific outcomes or metrics showing these improvements include detection coverage based on MITRE ATT&CK. The metric is simulated techniques successfully detected. Before Picus Security, it was 57% to 75%. After tuning with Picus Security, it was 80% to 95%. Additionally, for prevention effectiveness, represented by control efficacy, the metric is the percentage of attacks blocked before execution. Before it was 40% to 55%. After tuning with Picus Security, it reached 70% to 90%.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"After using AttackIQ, it has helped the team and the company improve on false positives and reduce risk, as most people are now capable of identifying how to work on detection, improving fine-tuning and all those things."
"Overall, I've had a good experience with the product. It's worked well for me."
"The impact on the organization from using Picus Security was important because it increased visibility of security gaps, reduced a false sense of security, improved SOC detection accuracy, and supported audit and compliance in frameworks such as ISO 27001, NIST, and CIS Controls."
"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."
"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."
"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."
"It provides good reports and offers signature-based solutions."
"The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs."
 

Cons

"The initial setup was quite difficult and took a long time."
"To improve, Picus Security could consider establishing a data center in India to address trust issues and increase interest from Indian customers."
"From a real-world perspective, Picus Security could be improved with more native integration with LATAM-used tools, improved report customization for executive-level dashboards, and enhanced automation in remediation workflows, ideally with SOAR-like capabilities."
"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."
"There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support."
"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."
"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."
"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"There is a yearly license according to the number of vectors. The pricing is moderate."
"They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AttackIQ?
AttackIQ can be improved by implementing more of a security training platform focused on real-world scenarios, simulating real-world attack behavior aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK and NIST frame...
What is your primary use case for AttackIQ?
My main use case for AttackIQ is conducting breach and attack simulation or any kind of new ransomware simulation, basically for executing particular real-world attack scenarios. Regarding my main ...
What advice do you have for others considering AttackIQ?
In my current organization, we are not using AttackIQ; in my previous organization, I have used AttackIQ, and it was more of hands-on training rather than being deployed as a typical tool for impro...
What do you like most about Picus Security?
The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Picus Security?
The pricing of Picus Security is average, and it offers a good value for money.
What needs improvement with Picus Security?
There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support. Picus Security could improve the response time.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

DeepSurface
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Akbank, Exclusive Networks, Garanti, ING Bank, QNB Finansbank, Turkcell, Vodafone, Yapı Kredi
Find out what your peers are saying about AttackIQ vs. Picus Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.