Pentera vs Picus Security comparison

Read 6 Picus Security reviews

2,437 Views
2,218 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pentera

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Picus Security and Pentera are competing products in cybersecurity solutions. Pentera has an upper hand with its advanced feature set, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Picus Security enhances security through continuous validation, allowing simulation of attacks to assess vulnerabilities and recommend improvements. It provides security control validation, making sure operational controls can mitigate attacks, and integrates with various security tools. Pentera offers automated penetration testing and real-time impact analysis. It enables continuous vulnerability assessment with automated processes and features attack surface mapping to bolster cybersecurity strategies.

Room for Improvement: Picus Security could expand its feature set to meet more comprehensive security needs and improve its automation capabilities. It can also enhance the depth of its vulnerability assessments and real-time impact analyses. For Pentera, simplifying the deployment process and reducing complexity would be beneficial. It could offer better customization options and improve user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Picus Security is known for a straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, facilitating efficient security operations. Pentera provides support to guide complex implementations, but its advanced features require additional setup steps. Despite this complexity, its customer service helps users during implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Picus Security's pricing is competitive, ensuring good ROI by enhancing security protocols cost-effectively. Pentera, although more expensive, offers significant ROI with advanced testing features delivering comprehensive insights and proactive threat management, appealing to those who prioritize sophisticated cybersecurity measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Pentera vs. Picus Security Report (Updated: April 2026).

Pentera vs. Picus Security

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pentera

Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Penetration Testing Services (4th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (2nd)

Picus Security

Ranking in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) category, the mindshare of Pentera is 20.7%, down from 30.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Picus Security is 11.6%, down from 18.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Pentera	20.7%
Picus Security	11.6%
Other	67.7%

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

Featured Reviews

Sabbir Ahmed

Director at Infosonik Systems Ltd

Comprehensive attack surface coverage and real-world threat emulation strengthen security while licensing models need improvement

Comprehensive Attack Surface includes several features. Omni Attack Surface discovers, assesses, and exploits vulnerabilities across both internal networks and external assets, including cloud environments from a single platform. External Attack Surface Management (EASM) and Internal Network Validation test internal security controls and identify weaknesses within the internal network. Automated Penetration Testing features are provided through the Pentera Surface module. Surface provides automated validation and penetration testing features with a proactive, continuous, and highly realistic approach to cybersecurity validation, helping organizations understand and reduce their true cyber exposure. They have AI-based reporting that leverages AI to identify patterns of exploitability over time, aggregate results across sites, and highlight recurring weaknesses. They offer two types of reports: an elaborate technical report for CTOs and an Executive Summary for management. When customers see the reports after completing the POC, they are impressed by how detailed the technical report is, while management can understand what actions need to be taken to protect their network and infrastructure. Recent Gartner reports indicate that traditional VAPT companies perform vulnerability testing at specific times, which creates security gaps. Pentera provides continuous validation, running 24/7 in the infrastructure. This means when any vulnerability appears due to firmware upgrades, OS updates, or software changes, it can be automatically identified in real-time.

Read full review

erdemerdag

Cybersecurity Operations Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Breach and attack simulation software that provides network, endpoint, and email vectors

According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent. The best case scenario is to add an agent solution where an agent would have the ability to actually detect which programs aren't working. For the attack software, you put a peer on the cloud site, and you have another peer internal network. There is IPS, firewall, WAF, and DBS amongst these peers. The cloud's peer is trying to send the attack file to the internal network. Maybe the firewall is blocking it, maybe the IP, maybe the WAF, but you cannot see the details. You can say, "Yes, my security product is blocking that attack scenario," or, "I cannot block this attack."

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."

"The product is easy to use."

"Surface provides automated validation and penetration testing features with a proactive, continuous, and highly realistic approach to cybersecurity validation, helping organizations understand and reduce their true cyber exposure."

"Pentera has many authentic features."

"The platform's most valuable features are credential management and vulnerability management."

"Pentera has many authentic features."

"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."

"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."

More Pentera pros

"It provides good reports and offers signature-based solutions."

"You have the liberty of physically executing a specific set of rules in your environment."

"The list of vulnerabilities that get detected is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration capabilities with the other security tools."

"The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs."

"Picus Security has improved and is still improving the security level of my organization."

"One of the most valuable features would be the detection capability, specifically the ability to detect alarms and logs collected from SIEM tools."

"It's very useful software because the customer mostly configures their IPS and manages their firewalls, WAF, and the DBS according to the latest update, latest news, or according to the situation."

Cons

"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."

"The licensing and IP management need improvement. When the IP is imported into a system, we cannot withdraw or revoke the license."

"The price could be improved."

"They need to offer support for a new graphic card."

"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."

"The automated penetration testing features must be improved."

"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."

"The licensing and IP management need improvement."

More Pentera cons

"Let's say if a customer's environment has 10 security devices and they need to know that there is an attack that has bypassed their devices, they cannot go and inspect every device and every rule in their security devices."

"To improve, Picus Security could consider establishing a data center in India to address trust issues and increase interest from Indian customers."

"There are a lot of other products which are performing better; as far as Picus is concerned, we have been aggressively trying to reach out to customers to try to sell it, but have not been successful."

"There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support."

"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."

"The reporting and data analysis could be improved. Specifically, the analysis of the results."

"According to the attack vectors, you cannot specify which product is failing or which product is working well because there's no agent."

"The amount of integrations that the product can handle is an area of concern, making it one of the aspects where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not that expensive, but it could be more cost-effective."

"The product's cost is reasonable. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"We have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Pentera."

"The tool is relatively cheap."

"There is a yearly license according to the number of vectors. The pricing is moderate."

"They have certain price ranges for their products, depending upon the use cases, and the number of applications the customer wants to try."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Pentera?

The licensing model has changed from earlier versions. Previously, there was a 500 IP cap, and customers needed to buy a minimum of 500 IP and consider 500 domains. In Bangladesh, many large organi...

What is your primary use case for Pentera?

Common use cases include several features. The POC is completed before any customer goes for procurement. Once the POC is done, customers appreciate features such as comprehensive attack surface co...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pentera?

The annual cost for all features is approximately 120,000 US dollars per year.

What do you like most about Picus Security?

The most valuable feature of Picus Security is its threat intelligence, providing suggestions to block and prevent attacks by identifying malicious files and providing threat IDs.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Picus Security?

The pricing of Picus Security is average, and it offers a good value for money.

What needs improvement with Picus Security?

There is room for improvement in the response rate provided by customer support. Picus Security could improve the response time.

The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai vs Pentera

Comparisons

Compared 20% of the time

Cymulate vs Pentera

Compared 12% of the time

XM Cyber vs Pentera

Compared 5% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Pentera

Compared 5% of the time

SafeBreach vs Pentera

Compared 5% of the time

More Pentera Competitors

Cymulate vs Picus Security

Compared 20% of the time

AttackIQ vs Picus Security

Compared 17% of the time

SafeBreach vs Picus Security

Compared 13% of the time

XM Cyber vs Picus Security

Compared 6% of the time

The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai vs Picus Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Picus Security Competitors

Product Reports

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)

Download Pentera product report

Download Picus Security product report

Overview

Pentera offers organizations automated vulnerability assessment and penetration testing capabilities, continuously scanning networks and managing credentials for enhanced security.

Pentera delivers automated vulnerability and penetration testing tools, providing continuous security scanning and comprehensive attack surface analysis. Its AI-based reporting identifies vulnerabilities with detailed executive reports to guide vulnerability management and remediation. Organizations gain from proactive cybersecurity strategies with features such as External Attack Surface Management and Internal Network Validation. Real-time updates ensure constant protection.

What are Pentera's Key Features?

Automated Vulnerability Assessment: Identifies system weaknesses and potential risks.
Continuous Scanning: Ensures ongoing network protection against threats.
Credential Management: Strengthens password security and management.
AI-Based Reporting: Offers detailed technical and executive insights.
External Attack Surface Management: Identifies and mitigates threats from external vectors.
Internal Network Validation: Validates internal defense mechanisms against vulnerabilities.

What Benefits Should Users Look For in Reviews?

Enhanced Network Protection: Proactive approach to maintaining security integrity.
Detailed Risk Identification: Comprehensive identification of vulnerabilities.
Compliance Assurance: Streamlines regulatory compliance with continuous testing.
Real-time Security Updates: Consistent network scanning against emerging threats.

Pentera is widely used in sectors like banking, telecommunications, and government, performing security validation and compliance tests. Its real-world attack emulation and risk-based prioritization ensure secure networks without operational disruption. The solution aligns with the Mitre ATT&CK framework, supporting agentless deployment.

Pentera

Picus Security provides automated attack simulation and MITRE framework mapping to enhance security validations and detection. It improves integration with existing security tools and updates protocols without affecting production servers.

Picus Security is tailored for continuous validation of security controls across hybrid environments. By simulating MITRE ATT&CK techniques, it identifies detection gaps and advises on remediation. The platform supports managing firewall security and updating protocols, ensuring protection over network, endpoint, and email vectors. It offers comprehensive support for on-premise and cloud-based breach scenarios and provides real-time security updates.

What are the key features of Picus Security?

Automated Attack Simulation: Provides continuous assessment of security postures.
MITRE Framework Mapping: Enhances control effectiveness and detection accuracy.
Threat Intelligence: Offers tools to block and manage advanced threats.
Security Validation: Matures security validation strategies across environments.
Customizable Attacks: Allows tailored attack executions based on user needs.

What benefits can users expect from Picus Security?

Enhanced Security Metrics: Evidence-driven metrics for better security management.
Compliance Aid: Helps in meeting industry-specific compliance requirements.
Improved Detection: Provides robust detection capabilities for security breaches.
Operational Continuity: Updates protocols without disrupting production servers.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps security measures current and proactive.

Companies in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology leverage Picus Security for continuous security validation. By testing lateral movements, credential dumping scenarios, and firewall efficiencies, organizations ensure infrastructure resilience and maintain comprehensive detection coverage.

Sample Customers

Blackstone Group Caterpillar Apria Healthcare Taylor Vinters Sandler Capital Management Drawbridge BNP Paribas British Red Cross

Akbank, Exclusive Networks, Garanti, ING Bank, QNB Finansbank, Turkcell, Vodafone, Yapı Kredi

Pentera vs. Picus Security