Aurea CX Process vs No Magic MagicDraw comparison

Aurea and Dassault Systèmes are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Aurea is ranked #22, while Dassault Systèmes is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. Aurea holds a 2.0% mindshare in BPD, compared to Dassault Systèmes’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aurea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Dassault Systèmes users who would recommend it.

Aurea CX Process

Read 1 Aurea CX Process review

1,633 Views
719 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

No Magic MagicDraw

Read 19 No Magic MagicDraw reviews

2,563 Views
2,358 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Aurea CX Process

No Magic MagicDraw

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Process and No Magic MagicDraw based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi, Microsoft, Camunda and others in Business Process Design.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Design Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Process

Ranking in Business Process Design

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (43rd)

No Magic MagicDraw

Ranking in Business Process Design

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Aurea CX Process is 2.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw is 2.4%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
No Magic MagicDraw	2.4%
Aurea CX Process	2.0%
Other	95.6%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Hardik Chavda

Savvion (BPM) J2EE Developer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Facilitates development flexibility and easy customization

Flexibility of development. Developer can use various JavaScript APIs for development. Most (or all) of the components are plug and play. Customization is easily achievable most of the time As mentioned above, it is more flexible than other products available in the market. Performance. More…

Read full review

reviewer2080611

System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Ease of use and real-time collaboration empower effective teamwork and streamlined development

For CAMEO, it's not only the ease of use, it's versatility, its communicability, but Rhapsody is the worst tool I've ever used. It is very difficult, not user-friendly, and very expensive. It works only with its IBM counterparts. SPARX Enterprise Architecture is very easy to use, but it's limited. It gives you an idea of how your model is developing, so this feature helps maintain integrity or correctness of system models. It's really a good feature to have. You've got to have the simulation toolkit installed to be able to do that, and that works really well. The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that. I would prefer that it come with the simulation toolkit.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Flexibility of development; the developer can use various JavaScript APIs for development and most or all of the components are plug and play, so customization is easily achievable most of the time."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to quickly build multiple layers within the organizational and business process environments, as well as in the SysML product environments, and converting to files that can be accessed by clients who do not have a system and a teamwork server access."

"No Magic has the tools and capabilities to model a complete enterprise and all product lines."

"When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool. You can use it for business architecture design. You can use it for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise. However, it was initially designed and developed for model-based systems engineering. That's the systems engineering required to either produce an IP system or product. It takes away the mounds of paper and puts it into a model. It enables you to generate significant savings by modeling that new product or that system before you ever start developing a prototype."

"I would rate MagicDraw a nine out of ten because of the price. Enterprise Architect has a lot of bugs and MagicDraw is a lot more accurate and flexible. It's a level better."

"Offers good standards compliance and is user-friendly."

"The most valuable features with No Magic MagicDraw are its ease of use; you can put this in front of a 12-year-old and they would know what to do right away."

"We are getting away from the old ways of writing a lot of papers and requirements documents, architecture documents, technical solution documents, interface documents - those days are gone."

"The most valuable features are the visibility, standard compliance, and interface."

More No Magic MagicDraw pros

Cons

"Yes, the servers are not as efficient as required."

"I would like to see the ability to deploy live business process models and capture real-time data (without the need for another product tool) so you don't have to be dependent on other products for this functionality."

"It's very focused on specific modern languages and it doesn't do necessarily general systems software engineering with diagrams. They should expand the diagram types for the languages."

"The documentation for MagicDraw and the video tutorials compared to other competitors is an area for improvement."

"Larger models slow you down; committing, updating, merging of branches and comparing of models (diff) do not scale yet; issues will hopefully be solved with upcoming V19."

"For the next releases, I would like to have them import requirements from other sources. They could make it very easy to do that because there are a lot requirements management tools like DOORS, D-O-O-R-S, Dynamic Object Oriented Management. A lot of folks use DOORS to create a requirement. For those requirements you allocate them to a component in the architecture and a verification method for that requirement. It would be good if we could import those into MagicDraw as components so you don't have to manually do these things."

"The UI UX of the tool is not really user-friendly and needs to be completely reformed."

"There could be a trial version for students."

"The cost of upgrading the product should be lower."

More No Magic MagicDraw cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It is an expensive product compared to software for model-based system engineering."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's expensive."

"I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

"In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades."

"The price of No Magic MagicDraw could improve. The price of the solution is too expensive for smaller-sized companies. There should be a better pricing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

11%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for No Magic MagicDraw?

Maybe the price is a little bit high for a small company to acquire this tool. However, they offer trial versions and trial licenses for members of INCOSE.

See all answers

What needs improvement with No Magic MagicDraw?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for No Magic MagicDraw?

I deal with DOD lifecycle acquisition sorts of things as some of the main use cases currently, and I expect to continue using it for more than 25 years.

See all answers

Comparisons

ARIS BPA vs Aurea CX Process

Compared 15% of the time

CMW Tracker vs Aurea CX Process

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Aurea CX Process

Compared 9% of the time

IBM BPM vs Aurea CX Process

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs Aurea CX Process

Compared 2% of the time

More Aurea CX Process Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 18% of the time

Visio vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 13% of the time

Visual Paradigm vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 3% of the time

More No Magic MagicDraw Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

July 2026

Download Aurea CX Process product report

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw

July 2026

Download No Magic MagicDraw product report

Also Known As

CX Process Enterprise, Savvion BusinessManager, Savvion Process Modeler

MagicDraw

Overview

Aurea CX Process provides robust tools for automating and optimizing business workflows, enhancing efficiency and decision-making capabilities within organizations.

Designed for enterprises seeking to streamline operations, Aurea CX Process offers a powerful suite for managing complex workflows. Its capability to automate tasks and offer deep insights into processes allows businesses to respond swiftly to market dynamics and customer demands. Seamless integration further aids its versatility, making it a suitable choice across industries looking to improve process management.

What are the essential features?

Workflow Automation: Automates intricate business operations to increase efficiency.
Process Monitoring: Offers real-time tracking and analytics to refine processes.
Integration Support: Easily integrates with existing systems to enhance usability.
Customization Options: Allows tailored configurations to meet specific business objectives.

What benefits should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation reduces manual intervention, optimizing performance.
Improved Decision-Making: Access to detailed analytics informs strategic choices.
Quick Adaptation: Enhances ability to respond to changing business environments.
Cost Savings: Streamlined processes lead to reduced operational costs.

Implementation of Aurea CX Process varies across industries, with finance sectors employing it for compliance management while manufacturing focuses on production processes. Retailers benefit from optimized supply chain operations. Its customization and integration capabilities allow industries to tailor its use to their specific needs, ensuring relevance and impact.

Aurea

No Magic MagicDraw is a powerful modeling tool recognized for its flexibility and integration capabilities, especially suited for enterprise modeling and systems engineering. Featuring a user-friendly interface, it supports diverse modeling architectures with tools for testing and simulation.

Renowned for its compliance with OMG standards, No Magic MagicDraw excels in offering comprehensive modeling options that support model-based systems engineering. Its rich feature set enables digital model creation aimed at testing and simulation, backed by a strong suite of integration tools. The tool facilitates program management integration with systems engineering, making it suitable for complex enterprise projects. However, suggestions for improvement include a redesign for a more intuitive interface and enhanced documentation. Licensing costs are higher compared to competitors, and integration requests include compatibility with SAP and modern C++ standards.

What are the most important features of No Magic MagicDraw?

Flexibility: Adapts to different modeling needs and architectures with ease.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies access and usage for modeling tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Doors.
Standard Compliance: Aligns with OMG standards.
Traceability: Maintains visibility across project changes.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from No Magic MagicDraw?

Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent technical support.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates model-driven documentation and teamwork.
Strategic Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time in business transformation projects.

No Magic MagicDraw is widely deployed for tasks including business transformation, system architecture modeling, and supporting defense programs, proving invaluable in enterprise and system modeling. It aids in strategy integration, process design, and offers extensive features like simulations and lifecycle engineering.

Dassault Systèmes

Sample Customers

Air France-KLM, Proximus, Barratt Developments, Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage

Northrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., Sodifrance

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Bizagi, Microsoft, Camunda and others in Business Process Design. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.